The problem of authenticity in the repertoire of the “Folclor” orchestra: institutional policies of the Moldovan Broadcasting, and reflections in the Soviet press from the 1970s-1980s

Q4 Arts and Humanities Arta Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.52603/arta.2023.32-2.03
Vasile Chiseliţă
{"title":"The problem of authenticity in the repertoire of the “Folclor” orchestra: institutional policies of the Moldovan Broadcasting, and reflections in the Soviet press from the 1970s-1980s","authors":"Vasile Chiseliţă","doi":"10.52603/arta.2023.32-2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study addresses the diverse and controversial aspects regarding the concept, notion and principle of authenticity in neo-traditional music, known as “popular/folk music”, promoted by the popular studio orchestra “Folclor”, within the Republican Television and Radio Broadcasting Company (TRM), in the ideological context of the Soviet period, throughout 1970-1980s. The author tries to reveal the directorial role of the Artistic Council of the TRM, as an institutional body of control, censorship, evaluation, homologation and political accreditation of the popular creations as cultural expressions of the Moldavian SSR, in accordance with the cultural policies of the party-state. Calling on the analysis of some studies on the topic, the synthesis of typical wordings from the minutes and the evaluation of the critics, exposed in the press pages of the era, the main characteristics of the neo-traditional popular/folk authenticity are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":55785,"journal":{"name":"Arta","volume":"761 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52603/arta.2023.32-2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study addresses the diverse and controversial aspects regarding the concept, notion and principle of authenticity in neo-traditional music, known as “popular/folk music”, promoted by the popular studio orchestra “Folclor”, within the Republican Television and Radio Broadcasting Company (TRM), in the ideological context of the Soviet period, throughout 1970-1980s. The author tries to reveal the directorial role of the Artistic Council of the TRM, as an institutional body of control, censorship, evaluation, homologation and political accreditation of the popular creations as cultural expressions of the Moldavian SSR, in accordance with the cultural policies of the party-state. Calling on the analysis of some studies on the topic, the synthesis of typical wordings from the minutes and the evaluation of the critics, exposed in the press pages of the era, the main characteristics of the neo-traditional popular/folk authenticity are highlighted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Folclor "管弦乐团曲目的真实性问题:摩尔多瓦广播电台的体制政策以及 1970-1980 年代苏联新闻界的反映
本研究探讨了在 1970-1980 年代苏联时期的意识形态背景下,新传统音乐(即 "流行/民间音乐")中有关真实性概念、观念和原则的各种有争议的方面,这些音乐是由共和国广播电视公司(TRM)内的流行工作室乐团 "Folclor "推广的。作者试图揭示 TRM 艺术委员会的指导作用,即根据党和国家的文化政策,对作为摩尔达维亚苏维埃社会主义共和国文化表现形式的通俗创作进行控制、审查、评估、认可和政治认证的机构。通过对一些相关研究报告的分析、对会议记录中典型措辞的归纳以及对评论家的评 价(见当时的报纸版面),突出强调了新传统流行/民间真实性的主要特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arta
Arta Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cinematic dialogue “Quo vadis, populi?”: history and destinies Identity dilemmas in the context of media globalization Folk Dance in the Educational Process The Dramatic Model of the 19th Century French Novel Three XIX Century Wallachian Dances in Edward Jones’ Melody Collection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1