Brazilian splitting experiment and finite element simulation analysis of the influence of bedding loading angle on shale fracture mode

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Natural Gas Industry B Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ngib.2023.11.007
Yingkun Zhang , Shangbin Chen , Xiaohang Zhai , Jamil Khan , Yuhang Zhang
{"title":"Brazilian splitting experiment and finite element simulation analysis of the influence of bedding loading angle on shale fracture mode","authors":"Yingkun Zhang ,&nbsp;Shangbin Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaohang Zhai ,&nbsp;Jamil Khan ,&nbsp;Yuhang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ngib.2023.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During the diagenetic processes of compaction and cementation, shale forms multiple beddings, significantly effecting the rock anisotropy. Therefore, it is important to study the effect of bedding on the mechanical properties of shale to guide fracturing engineering. To study the failure mode and fracture morphology of shale with bedding planes under different bedding dip angles, Brazilian disc splitting tests and finite element numerical simulations are performed for shale samples and the results are compared. (1) The bedding angle has a significant effect on the failure mode and tensile strength of shale, and the tensile strength tends to increase with increasing bedding angle. (2) The failure modes of shale under different bedding dip angles can be divided into three types: tensile failure along the bedding plane; comprehensive shear and tensile failure of the matrix and the bedding plane; and matrix tensile failure. (3) The direction of secondary cracks is mostly perpendicular to the bedding plane, and a smaller angle between the load application direction and the bedding direction results in a larger number of generated cracks with more complex shapes. (4) When the loading angle of the bedding is 30°, the tensile strength is low and the matrix and the bedding plane are comprehensively destroyed by shear and tension, resulting in a more complex joint mesh; conversely, when the bedding angle is greater than 60°, the tensile strength increases and the complexity of the seam mesh decreases. These findings can provide guidance for the selection of the bedding angle and the design of fracturing schemes in fracturing engineering.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37116,"journal":{"name":"Natural Gas Industry B","volume":"10 6","pages":"Pages 602-612"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352854023000803/pdfft?md5=e81fd6a6a92b296631dd1cd5d2f3dae8&pid=1-s2.0-S2352854023000803-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Gas Industry B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352854023000803","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the diagenetic processes of compaction and cementation, shale forms multiple beddings, significantly effecting the rock anisotropy. Therefore, it is important to study the effect of bedding on the mechanical properties of shale to guide fracturing engineering. To study the failure mode and fracture morphology of shale with bedding planes under different bedding dip angles, Brazilian disc splitting tests and finite element numerical simulations are performed for shale samples and the results are compared. (1) The bedding angle has a significant effect on the failure mode and tensile strength of shale, and the tensile strength tends to increase with increasing bedding angle. (2) The failure modes of shale under different bedding dip angles can be divided into three types: tensile failure along the bedding plane; comprehensive shear and tensile failure of the matrix and the bedding plane; and matrix tensile failure. (3) The direction of secondary cracks is mostly perpendicular to the bedding plane, and a smaller angle between the load application direction and the bedding direction results in a larger number of generated cracks with more complex shapes. (4) When the loading angle of the bedding is 30°, the tensile strength is low and the matrix and the bedding plane are comprehensively destroyed by shear and tension, resulting in a more complex joint mesh; conversely, when the bedding angle is greater than 60°, the tensile strength increases and the complexity of the seam mesh decreases. These findings can provide guidance for the selection of the bedding angle and the design of fracturing schemes in fracturing engineering.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西劈裂实验和有限元模拟分析垫层加载角对页岩断裂模式的影响
在压实和胶结的成岩过程中,页岩会形成多种层理,对岩石的各向异性产生重大影响。因此,研究层理对页岩力学性质的影响对指导压裂工程具有重要意义。为了研究不同层理倾角下具有层理平面的页岩的破坏模式和断裂形态,对页岩样品进行了巴西圆盘劈裂试验和有限元数值模拟,并对结果进行了比较。(1)层理倾角对页岩的破坏模式和抗拉强度有显著影响,抗拉强度随层理倾角的增大而增大。(2) 不同铺层倾角下页岩的破坏模式可分为三种:沿铺层平面的拉伸破坏;基体与铺层平面的综合剪切和拉伸破坏;基体拉伸破坏。(3)次生裂缝的方向大多垂直于铺层面,加载方向与铺层方向的夹角越小,产生的裂缝数量越多,形状越复杂。(4)当垫层的加载角为 30°时,抗拉强度较低,基体和垫层平面受到剪切和拉伸的全面破坏,导致接缝网状结构更加复杂;相反,当垫层的加载角大于 60°时,抗拉强度增加,接缝网状结构的复杂性降低。这些发现可为压裂工程中铺层角度的选择和压裂方案的设计提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Gas Industry B
Natural Gas Industry B Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
79 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Dynamic simulation optimization of the hydrogen liquefaction process Advances on research of H2S removal by deep eutectic solvents as green solvent Relationship between potentiometric surface and abnormally low pressure in the Yanchang Formation, Zhenjing area, Ordos Basin, China The hydrocarbon generation potential of the mudstone source rock in the Jurassic Shuixigou Group, the Turpan-Hami Basin, and indicative significance for oil and gas exploration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1