Examining Asylum Seekers’ “Other Vulnerabilities”: Intersectionality in Context

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY European Journal of Migration and Law Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1163/15718166-12340165
Christine Flamand, Francesca Raimondo, Sylvie Saroléa
{"title":"Examining Asylum Seekers’ “Other Vulnerabilities”: Intersectionality in Context","authors":"Christine Flamand, Francesca Raimondo, Sylvie Saroléa","doi":"10.1163/15718166-12340165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores how “other vulnerabilities” can be examined through an intersectional perspective. “Other vulnerabilities” are the ones either established in the current policy and legal framework at the international and national level or, in addition, those that have been identified throughout the <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">VULNER</span> research path, besides age, gender and human trafficking. These “other vulnerabilities” have been classified along three dimensions: <em>personal, situational</em> and <em>administrative</em> vulnerabilities. Against this backdrop, the present work claims how the notion of intersectionality should be used as a heuristic tool through which examine and better understand vulnerabilities. Since that intersecting vulnerabilities are the rule and not the exception, intersectionality is crucial in order to ensure a more comprehensive and tailored identification and assessment of vulnerability. Through an intersectional approach, vulnerability is not read and interpret along a presence/absence perspective, but as a condition composed of multiple layers that are susceptible to change in time and space.</p>","PeriodicalId":51819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Migration and Law","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Migration and Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores how “other vulnerabilities” can be examined through an intersectional perspective. “Other vulnerabilities” are the ones either established in the current policy and legal framework at the international and national level or, in addition, those that have been identified throughout the VULNER research path, besides age, gender and human trafficking. These “other vulnerabilities” have been classified along three dimensions: personal, situational and administrative vulnerabilities. Against this backdrop, the present work claims how the notion of intersectionality should be used as a heuristic tool through which examine and better understand vulnerabilities. Since that intersecting vulnerabilities are the rule and not the exception, intersectionality is crucial in order to ensure a more comprehensive and tailored identification and assessment of vulnerability. Through an intersectional approach, vulnerability is not read and interpret along a presence/absence perspective, but as a condition composed of multiple layers that are susceptible to change in time and space.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审查寻求庇护者的 "其他脆弱性":背景下的交叉性
本文探讨了如何通过交叉视角来研究 "其他脆弱性"。"其他脆弱性 "是指除年龄、性别和人口贩运之外,在国际和国家层面的现行政策和法律框架中确立的脆弱性,或在整个 VULNER 研究过程中发现的脆弱性。这些 "其他脆弱性 "按三个方面进行了分类:个人脆弱性、情境脆弱性和行政脆弱性。在此背景下,本研究报告提出了应如何将交叉性概念作为一种启发式工具,用于研究和更好地理解脆弱性。由于相互交织的脆弱性是普遍现象而非例外,交叉性对于确保更全面、更有针对性地识别和评估脆弱性至关重要。通过交叉性方法,脆弱性不是从存在/不存在的角度来解读和解释的,而是作为一种由多层次组成的条件,容易在时间和空间上发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Migration and Law is a quarterly journal on migration law and policy with specific emphasis on the European Union, the Council of Europe and migration activities within the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe. This journal differs from other migration journals by focusing on both the law and policy within the field of migration, as opposed to examining immigration and migration policies from a wholly sociological perspective. The Journal is the initiative of the Centre for Migration Law of the University of Nijmegen, in co-operation with the Brussels-based Migration Policy Group.
期刊最新文献
The ‘Border Security’ Concept in EU Law EU Boots on the Ground and Effective Judicial Protection against Frontex’s Operational Powers in Return: Lessons from Case T‑600/21 When Do Union Citizens and Their Families Have the Right to Equal Treatment on Grounds of Nationality in EU Law? The Fiction of Non-entry in European Migration Law: Its Implications on the Rights of Asylum Seekers and Irregular Migrants at European Borders Derogations in Exchange of Increased Responsibility: How Can This Fix the Broken Promise for More Solidarity in the EU?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1