When Do Union Citizens and Their Families Have the Right to Equal Treatment on Grounds of Nationality in EU Law?

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY European Journal of Migration and Law Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1163/15718166-12340180
Gareth Davies
{"title":"When Do Union Citizens and Their Families Have the Right to Equal Treatment on Grounds of Nationality in EU Law?","authors":"Gareth Davies","doi":"10.1163/15718166-12340180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Article 18 <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">TFEU</span> appears to prohibit nationality discrimination throughout the scope of EU law, but the Court of Justice uses various techniques to often deny equal treatment to people who are within that scope. It wants to create a layered regime of rights, which takes account of the degree of integration and participation of Union Citizens and their families, but this ambition is in tension with the apparently simple Article 18 rule. The solution, this article suggests, is to recognize that discrimination itself is a layered concept, allowing for justified distinctions, and so for different treatment of different groups. There is a surprising amount of support for this view in the case law. The article looks at the cases on equal treatment for Union Citizens and their families, including <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">TCN</span> family members, and tries to provide a coherent conceptual and legal frame which explains their results.</p>","PeriodicalId":51819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Migration and Law","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Migration and Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article 18 TFEU appears to prohibit nationality discrimination throughout the scope of EU law, but the Court of Justice uses various techniques to often deny equal treatment to people who are within that scope. It wants to create a layered regime of rights, which takes account of the degree of integration and participation of Union Citizens and their families, but this ambition is in tension with the apparently simple Article 18 rule. The solution, this article suggests, is to recognize that discrimination itself is a layered concept, allowing for justified distinctions, and so for different treatment of different groups. There is a surprising amount of support for this view in the case law. The article looks at the cases on equal treatment for Union Citizens and their families, including TCN family members, and tries to provide a coherent conceptual and legal frame which explains their results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在欧盟法律中,欧盟公民及其家人何时享有基于国籍的平等待遇权?
欧盟运作条约》第 18 条似乎在整个欧盟法律范围内禁止国籍歧视,但法院却使用各种手段,经常拒绝平等对待在该范围内的人。法院希望建立一个分层的权利体系,考虑到欧盟公民及其家人的融入和参与程度,但这一雄心壮志与看似简单的第 18 条规则存在矛盾。本文认为,解决办法是承认歧视本身是一个分层的概念,允许合理的区别对待,因此也允许对不同群体的不同待遇。这一观点在判例法中得到了令人惊讶的支持。本文探讨了关于平等对待联盟公民及其家庭成员(包括 TCN 家庭成员)的案例,并试图提供一个连贯的概念和法律框架来解释其结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Migration and Law is a quarterly journal on migration law and policy with specific emphasis on the European Union, the Council of Europe and migration activities within the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe. This journal differs from other migration journals by focusing on both the law and policy within the field of migration, as opposed to examining immigration and migration policies from a wholly sociological perspective. The Journal is the initiative of the Centre for Migration Law of the University of Nijmegen, in co-operation with the Brussels-based Migration Policy Group.
期刊最新文献
The ‘Border Security’ Concept in EU Law EU Boots on the Ground and Effective Judicial Protection against Frontex’s Operational Powers in Return: Lessons from Case T‑600/21 When Do Union Citizens and Their Families Have the Right to Equal Treatment on Grounds of Nationality in EU Law? The Fiction of Non-entry in European Migration Law: Its Implications on the Rights of Asylum Seekers and Irregular Migrants at European Borders Derogations in Exchange of Increased Responsibility: How Can This Fix the Broken Promise for More Solidarity in the EU?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1