Conceptual anatomy of the female genitalia using text mining and implications for patient care

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Medical Humanities Pub Date : 2023-12-26 DOI:10.1136/medhum-2023-012747
Carmen Thong, Alexis Doyle
{"title":"Conceptual anatomy of the female genitalia using text mining and implications for patient care","authors":"Carmen Thong, Alexis Doyle","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2023-012747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the conceptual histories of words associated with female genital parts to explore how they may affect the lived experience of people with these parts and the quality of gynaecological care they receive. Specifically, we examine the implications of using the word ‘vagina’ to replace the word ‘vulva’, or indeed to indicate the entire female genitalia. This article does so through an analysis of existing scholarly work and through text mining methods such as word frequencies, most distinctive word collocates and word-embeddings drawn from literary and women’s magazine corpora. We find that words indicating specific female genital parts are very infrequently mentioned in our corpora, which shows that there is a troubling lack of exposure and education in our socio-cultural context when it comes to the female genital anatomy. When they are mentioned, their usage reflects historical and patriarchal associations that have been primarily attached to the word ‘vagina’. When it comes to the ‘vagina’ and ‘vulva’, the penis is the most prevalent association by far; whereas the most commonly occurring female genital parts are parts to do with reproduction—reinforcing a long-standing and disproportionate emphasis on the female genitalia’s reproductive function. Our research also reveals a concerning emphasis on non-evidence-based female hygiene products, thus perpetuating the damaging stereotype of the dirty vagina. These findings may explain many negative patient outcomes such as stigma attached to seeking out timely gynaecological care, lack of informed medical consent and non-evidence-based practices exacerbated by problematic cultural depictions of the female genitalia. They can also explain the neglect of female sexual agency, pleasure and well-being. Understanding historical and contemporary usages of words for the female genitalia has important implications for the quality of patient care today and is a critical component of gender and reproductive justice. Data are available on reasonable request. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Corpora used for text mining are not publicly available and under copyright. Additional word frequency, MDW collocation or word embedding results may be requested from Carmen Thong.","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012747","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the conceptual histories of words associated with female genital parts to explore how they may affect the lived experience of people with these parts and the quality of gynaecological care they receive. Specifically, we examine the implications of using the word ‘vagina’ to replace the word ‘vulva’, or indeed to indicate the entire female genitalia. This article does so through an analysis of existing scholarly work and through text mining methods such as word frequencies, most distinctive word collocates and word-embeddings drawn from literary and women’s magazine corpora. We find that words indicating specific female genital parts are very infrequently mentioned in our corpora, which shows that there is a troubling lack of exposure and education in our socio-cultural context when it comes to the female genital anatomy. When they are mentioned, their usage reflects historical and patriarchal associations that have been primarily attached to the word ‘vagina’. When it comes to the ‘vagina’ and ‘vulva’, the penis is the most prevalent association by far; whereas the most commonly occurring female genital parts are parts to do with reproduction—reinforcing a long-standing and disproportionate emphasis on the female genitalia’s reproductive function. Our research also reveals a concerning emphasis on non-evidence-based female hygiene products, thus perpetuating the damaging stereotype of the dirty vagina. These findings may explain many negative patient outcomes such as stigma attached to seeking out timely gynaecological care, lack of informed medical consent and non-evidence-based practices exacerbated by problematic cultural depictions of the female genitalia. They can also explain the neglect of female sexual agency, pleasure and well-being. Understanding historical and contemporary usages of words for the female genitalia has important implications for the quality of patient care today and is a critical component of gender and reproductive justice. Data are available on reasonable request. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Corpora used for text mining are not publicly available and under copyright. Additional word frequency, MDW collocation or word embedding results may be requested from Carmen Thong.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用文本挖掘对女性生殖器进行概念解剖及其对患者护理的影响
本文分析了与女性生殖器官有关的词汇的概念历史,以探讨这些词汇如何影响有这些生殖器官的人的生活体验以及她们所接受的妇科护理的质量。具体而言,我们研究了使用 "阴道 "一词取代 "外阴 "一词,或实际上表示整个女性生殖器的含义。本文通过对现有学术著作的分析,以及从文学和女性杂志语料库中提取的词频、最独特的词组和词缀等文本挖掘方法,对这一问题进行了研究。我们发现,在我们的语料库中,表示特定女性生殖器部位的词语很少被提及,这表明在我们的社会文化背景下,人们对女性生殖器解剖缺乏了解和教育,这一点令人担忧。当提及这些器官时,它们的用法反映了历史和父权制的联想,而这些联想主要附着在 "阴道 "一词上。说到 "阴道 "和 "外阴",阴茎是迄今为止最普遍的联想;而最常出现的女性生殖器部位则是与生殖有关的部位--这强化了长期以来对女性生殖器生殖功能不成比例的强调。我们的研究还发现,人们对无证据依据的女性卫生用品的重视程度令人担忧,从而延续了 "阴道肮脏 "这一有害的刻板印象。这些研究结果可以解释病人的许多负面结果,如及时寻求妇科治疗所带来的耻辱感、缺乏知情医疗同意和非基于证据的做法,而对女性生殖器的文化描述问题又加剧了这种情况。它们也可以解释为什么女性的性自主权、性快感和性幸福被忽视。了解女性生殖器的历史和当代用法对当今病人护理的质量具有重要影响,也是性别和生殖公正的重要组成部分。如有合理要求,可提供数据。数据可能来自第三方,不对外公开。用于文本挖掘的语料库不对外公开,且受版权保护。可向 Carmen Thong 索取更多词频、MDW 搭配或词语嵌入结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
期刊最新文献
Imagining alternative futures with augmentative and alternative communication: a manifesto. Why robot embodiment matters: questions of disability, race and intersectionality in the design of social robots. Correspondence on "Dating apps as health allies? Examining the opportunities and challenges of dating apps as partners in public health" by Garcia-Iglesias et al. Exploring the GP-patient relationship: a historical narration. Stories of chronic illness: exploring qualitative data through poetic transcriptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1