Beyond-accuracy: a review on diversity, serendipity, and fairness in recommender systems based on graph neural networks.

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Frontiers in Big Data Pub Date : 2023-12-19 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdata.2023.1251072
Tomislav Duricic, Dominik Kowald, Emanuel Lacic, Elisabeth Lex
{"title":"Beyond-accuracy: a review on diversity, serendipity, and fairness in recommender systems based on graph neural networks.","authors":"Tomislav Duricic, Dominik Kowald, Emanuel Lacic, Elisabeth Lex","doi":"10.3389/fdata.2023.1251072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>By providing personalized suggestions to users, recommender systems have become essential to numerous online platforms. Collaborative filtering, particularly graph-based approaches using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), have demonstrated great results in terms of recommendation accuracy. However, accuracy may not always be the most important criterion for evaluating recommender systems' performance, since beyond-accuracy aspects such as recommendation diversity, serendipity, and fairness can strongly influence user engagement and satisfaction. This review paper focuses on addressing these dimensions in GNN-based recommender systems, going beyond the conventional accuracy-centric perspective. We begin by reviewing recent developments in approaches that improve not only the accuracy-diversity trade-off but also promote serendipity, and fairness in GNN-based recommender systems. We discuss different stages of model development including data preprocessing, graph construction, embedding initialization, propagation layers, embedding fusion, score computation, and training methodologies. Furthermore, we present a look into the practical difficulties encountered in assuring diversity, serendipity, and fairness, while retaining high accuracy. Finally, we discuss potential future research directions for developing more robust GNN-based recommender systems that go beyond the unidimensional perspective of focusing solely on accuracy. This review aims to provide researchers and practitioners with an in-depth understanding of the multifaceted issues that arise when designing GNN-based recommender systems, setting our work apart by offering a comprehensive exploration of beyond-accuracy dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":52859,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Big Data","volume":"6 ","pages":"1251072"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10762851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2023.1251072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By providing personalized suggestions to users, recommender systems have become essential to numerous online platforms. Collaborative filtering, particularly graph-based approaches using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), have demonstrated great results in terms of recommendation accuracy. However, accuracy may not always be the most important criterion for evaluating recommender systems' performance, since beyond-accuracy aspects such as recommendation diversity, serendipity, and fairness can strongly influence user engagement and satisfaction. This review paper focuses on addressing these dimensions in GNN-based recommender systems, going beyond the conventional accuracy-centric perspective. We begin by reviewing recent developments in approaches that improve not only the accuracy-diversity trade-off but also promote serendipity, and fairness in GNN-based recommender systems. We discuss different stages of model development including data preprocessing, graph construction, embedding initialization, propagation layers, embedding fusion, score computation, and training methodologies. Furthermore, we present a look into the practical difficulties encountered in assuring diversity, serendipity, and fairness, while retaining high accuracy. Finally, we discuss potential future research directions for developing more robust GNN-based recommender systems that go beyond the unidimensional perspective of focusing solely on accuracy. This review aims to provide researchers and practitioners with an in-depth understanding of the multifaceted issues that arise when designing GNN-based recommender systems, setting our work apart by offering a comprehensive exploration of beyond-accuracy dimensions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越准确性:基于图神经网络的推荐系统中的多样性、偶然性和公平性综述。
通过向用户提供个性化建议,推荐系统已成为众多在线平台的重要组成部分。协作过滤,尤其是使用图神经网络(GNN)的基于图的方法,在推荐准确性方面取得了巨大的成果。然而,准确性并不总是评价推荐系统性能的最重要标准,因为推荐多样性、偶然性和公平性等准确性之外的方面也会对用户参与度和满意度产生重大影响。本综述论文将重点讨论在基于 GNN 的推荐系统中如何超越传统的以准确性为中心的视角,解决这些方面的问题。我们首先回顾了在基于 GNN 的推荐系统中,不仅能改善准确性-多样性权衡,还能促进偶然性和公平性的方法的最新进展。我们讨论了模型开发的不同阶段,包括数据预处理、图构建、嵌入初始化、传播层、嵌入融合、分数计算和训练方法。此外,我们还探讨了在确保多样性、偶然性和公平性的同时保持高准确性所遇到的实际困难。最后,我们讨论了开发基于 GNN 的更强大的推荐系统的潜在未来研究方向,这些研究方向超越了只关注准确性的单维视角。本综述旨在让研究人员和从业人员深入了解在设计基于 GNN 的推荐系统时出现的多方面问题,通过对准确性以外的维度进行全面探讨,使我们的工作与众不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cybermycelium: a reference architecture for domain-driven distributed big data systems. Cognitive warfare: a conceptual analysis of the NATO ACT cognitive warfare exploratory concept. An enhanced whale optimization algorithm for task scheduling in edge computing environments. Promoting fairness in link prediction with graph enhancement. Exploring code portability solutions for HEP with a particle tracking test code.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1