PROVIDENT: Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Neighborhood-level Overdose Risk in Rhode Island.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001695
Bennett Allen, Robert C Schell, Victoria A Jent, Maxwell Krieger, Claire Pratty, Benjamin D Hallowell, William C Goedel, Melissa Basta, Jesse L Yedinak, Yu Li, Abigail R Cartus, Brandon D L Marshall, Magdalena Cerdá, Jennifer Ahern, Daniel B Neill
{"title":"PROVIDENT: Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Neighborhood-level Overdose Risk in Rhode Island.","authors":"Bennett Allen, Robert C Schell, Victoria A Jent, Maxwell Krieger, Claire Pratty, Benjamin D Hallowell, William C Goedel, Melissa Basta, Jesse L Yedinak, Yu Li, Abigail R Cartus, Brandon D L Marshall, Magdalena Cerdá, Jennifer Ahern, Daniel B Neill","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug overdose persists as a leading cause of death in the United States, but resources to address it remain limited. As a result, health authorities must consider where to allocate scarce resources within their jurisdictions. Machine learning offers a strategy to identify areas with increased future overdose risk to proactively allocate overdose prevention resources. This modeling study is embedded in a randomized trial to measure the effect of proactive resource allocation on statewide overdose rates in Rhode Island (RI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used statewide data from RI from 2016 to 2020 to develop an ensemble machine learning model predicting neighborhood-level fatal overdose risk. Our ensemble model integrated gradient boosting machine and super learner base models in a moving window framework to make predictions in 6-month intervals. Our performance target, developed a priori with the RI Department of Health, was to identify the 20% of RI neighborhoods containing at least 40% of statewide overdose deaths, including at least one neighborhood per municipality. The model was validated after trial launch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our model selected priority neighborhoods capturing 40.2% of statewide overdose deaths during the test periods and 44.1% of statewide overdose deaths during validation periods. Our ensemble outperformed the base models during the test periods and performed comparably to the best-performing base model during the validation periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated the capacity for machine learning models to predict neighborhood-level fatal overdose risk to a degree of accuracy suitable for practitioners. Jurisdictions may consider predictive modeling as a tool to guide allocation of scarce resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"232-240"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10842082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001695","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug overdose persists as a leading cause of death in the United States, but resources to address it remain limited. As a result, health authorities must consider where to allocate scarce resources within their jurisdictions. Machine learning offers a strategy to identify areas with increased future overdose risk to proactively allocate overdose prevention resources. This modeling study is embedded in a randomized trial to measure the effect of proactive resource allocation on statewide overdose rates in Rhode Island (RI).

Methods: We used statewide data from RI from 2016 to 2020 to develop an ensemble machine learning model predicting neighborhood-level fatal overdose risk. Our ensemble model integrated gradient boosting machine and super learner base models in a moving window framework to make predictions in 6-month intervals. Our performance target, developed a priori with the RI Department of Health, was to identify the 20% of RI neighborhoods containing at least 40% of statewide overdose deaths, including at least one neighborhood per municipality. The model was validated after trial launch.

Results: Our model selected priority neighborhoods capturing 40.2% of statewide overdose deaths during the test periods and 44.1% of statewide overdose deaths during validation periods. Our ensemble outperformed the base models during the test periods and performed comparably to the best-performing base model during the validation periods.

Conclusions: We demonstrated the capacity for machine learning models to predict neighborhood-level fatal overdose risk to a degree of accuracy suitable for practitioners. Jurisdictions may consider predictive modeling as a tool to guide allocation of scarce resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PROVIDENT:开发和验证机器学习模型,以预测罗得岛州邻里一级的用药过量风险。
背景:吸毒过量一直是美国人的主要死因,但解决这一问题的资源仍然有限。因此,卫生部门必须考虑如何在其管辖范围内分配稀缺资源。机器学习提供了一种策略,可以识别未来用药过量风险增加的地区,从而主动分配预防用药过量的资源。这项建模研究包含在一项随机试验中,旨在衡量主动资源分配对罗得岛州全州用药过量率的影响:我们利用罗德岛州 2016-2020 年的全州数据开发了一个集合机器学习模型,用于预测邻里层面的致命用药过量风险。我们的集合模型在移动窗口框架中集成了梯度提升机器和超级学习者基础模型,以 6 个月为间隔进行预测。我们与罗得岛州卫生部事先制定的性能目标是,识别出罗得岛州至少有 40% 吸毒过量死亡的 20% 社区,包括每个市镇至少一个社区。试运行后对模型进行了验证:我们的模型选择了优先街区,在测试期间捕获了全州 40.2% 的吸毒过量死亡案例,在验证期间捕获了全州 44.1% 的吸毒过量死亡案例。在测试期间,我们的集合表现优于基础模型,在验证期间,我们的集合表现与表现最好的基础模型相当:我们展示了机器学习模型预测邻里级致命用药过量风险的能力,其准确度适合从业人员使用。辖区可考虑将预测模型作为指导稀缺资源分配的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of Additive Gene-environment Interactions For Colorectal Cancer Risk. Doubly Marginalized: The Interplay of Racism and Disability in Outcomes for Minoritized People With Down Syndrome. Geospatial Data Aggregation Methods for Novel Geographies: Validating Congressional District Life Expectancy Estimates. Interactive Effects of Long-term Exposure to Air Pollutants on SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severity: A Northern Italian Population-based Cohort Study. Potential of a Second Screening Test for Alloimmunization in Pregnancies of Rhesus-positive Women: A Swedish Population-based Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1