Comparison of the Agitation-Reducing Effects of Esmolol and Lidocaine in Pediatric Strabismus Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Study

J. Ji, Kyu Sik Kang, Y. Seo, H. Jung, H. Chun, Jeong Soo Choi
{"title":"Comparison of the Agitation-Reducing Effects of Esmolol and Lidocaine in Pediatric Strabismus Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Study","authors":"J. Ji, Kyu Sik Kang, Y. Seo, H. Jung, H. Chun, Jeong Soo Choi","doi":"10.15746/sms.23.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Agitation is a common symptom in children undergoing surgery, especially when surgeries are performed under sevoflurane and when patients undergo strabismus surgery. Because agitation can increase the risk of falls and lacerations on surgical sites and can delay discharge from the recovery room, adopting measures to reduce the incidence of agitation is essential. This study aimed to compare the agitation-reducing effects of lidocaine and esmolol administered individually or as a combination.Methods: We included 80 patients scheduled to undergo strabismus surgery. Thiopental and sevoflurane were administered to induce general anesthesia. Group EL received lidocaine (2 mg/kg) right after the end of surgery and esmolol (0.5 mg/kg) immediately after recovery from anesthesia after turning the anesthetic gas off; group L received lidocaine at 2 mg/kg right after the end of surgery and did not receive esmolol, group E did not receive lidocaine at the end of the surgery but received esmolol at 0.5 mg/kg right after recovery from anesthesia, and group C received neither esmolol nor lidocaine. Agitation severity was assessed using the objective pain score, Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale immediately after recovery from anesthesia and until discharge from the recovery room.Results: Groups L and EL showed significantly lower agitation than groups E and C right after recovery from anesthesia, right after arrival to the recovery room, and 10 minutes after arrival to the recovery room (P < 0.05). Groups L and EL showed no differences in the reduction of the severity of agitation (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Compared to the groups without lidocaine administration, groups L and EL, which received 2 mg/kg lidocaine, showed a higher level of reduction in agitation immediately after recovery from anesthesia and right after arrival to the recovery room (P < 0.05).","PeriodicalId":22016,"journal":{"name":"Soonchunhyang Medical Science","volume":" 94","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soonchunhyang Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15746/sms.23.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Agitation is a common symptom in children undergoing surgery, especially when surgeries are performed under sevoflurane and when patients undergo strabismus surgery. Because agitation can increase the risk of falls and lacerations on surgical sites and can delay discharge from the recovery room, adopting measures to reduce the incidence of agitation is essential. This study aimed to compare the agitation-reducing effects of lidocaine and esmolol administered individually or as a combination.Methods: We included 80 patients scheduled to undergo strabismus surgery. Thiopental and sevoflurane were administered to induce general anesthesia. Group EL received lidocaine (2 mg/kg) right after the end of surgery and esmolol (0.5 mg/kg) immediately after recovery from anesthesia after turning the anesthetic gas off; group L received lidocaine at 2 mg/kg right after the end of surgery and did not receive esmolol, group E did not receive lidocaine at the end of the surgery but received esmolol at 0.5 mg/kg right after recovery from anesthesia, and group C received neither esmolol nor lidocaine. Agitation severity was assessed using the objective pain score, Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale immediately after recovery from anesthesia and until discharge from the recovery room.Results: Groups L and EL showed significantly lower agitation than groups E and C right after recovery from anesthesia, right after arrival to the recovery room, and 10 minutes after arrival to the recovery room (P < 0.05). Groups L and EL showed no differences in the reduction of the severity of agitation (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Compared to the groups without lidocaine administration, groups L and EL, which received 2 mg/kg lidocaine, showed a higher level of reduction in agitation immediately after recovery from anesthesia and right after arrival to the recovery room (P < 0.05).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在小儿斜视手术中比较艾司洛尔和利多卡因的镇静效果:双盲随机临床研究
目的:躁动是儿童接受手术时的常见症状,尤其是在七氟醚下进行手术和接受斜视手术时。由于躁动会增加跌倒和手术部位撕裂的风险,并会延迟从恢复室出院的时间,因此采取措施降低躁动发生率至关重要。本研究旨在比较利多卡因和艾司洛尔单独或联合用药对减少躁动的作用:我们纳入了 80 名计划接受斜视手术的患者。采用硫喷妥类和七氟醚诱导全身麻醉。EL组在手术结束后立即服用利多卡因(2 毫克/千克),并在麻醉气体关闭后立即服用艾司洛尔(0.5 毫克/千克);L组在手术结束后立即服用利多卡因(2 毫克/千克),但未服用艾司洛尔;E组在手术结束后未服用利多卡因,但在麻醉恢复后立即服用艾司洛尔(0.5 毫克/千克);C组既未服用艾司洛尔,也未服用利多卡因。在麻醉恢复后立即使用客观疼痛评分和小儿麻醉后谵妄量表评估躁动的严重程度,直至从恢复室出院:结果:L组和EL组在麻醉恢复后、到达恢复室后以及到达恢复室10分钟后的躁动程度明显低于E组和C组(P < 0.05)。L 组和 EL 组在减轻躁动严重程度方面没有差异(P > 0.05):结论:与未服用利多卡因的组别相比,服用 2 毫克/千克利多卡因的 L 组和 EL 组在麻醉恢复后立即和刚到达恢复室后躁动程度的减轻程度更高(P < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Atrial Fibrillation after COVID-19 Vaccination in an Adolescent: A Case Report A Case of Extremely Premature Baby with Persistent Metabolic Acidosis, Hypoglycemia and Dyselectrolytemia Induced by Liposomal Amphotericin B Comparison of the Agitation-Reducing Effects of Esmolol and Lidocaine in Pediatric Strabismus Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Study The Coexistence of Fibromuscular Dysplasia of the Renal Artery and Graves’ Disease in an Adolescent: A Case Report Monitored Anesthesia Care Primarily Using Dexmedetomidine Provides Safe Sedation and Analgesic Effect in Uterine Artery Embolization: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1