The Interpretation of Husserl’s Time-Consciousness in the Reconstruction of the Concept of Anthropic Time. Part Two

V. B. Khanzhy, D. Lyashenko
{"title":"The Interpretation of Husserl’s Time-Consciousness in the Reconstruction of the Concept of Anthropic Time. Part Two","authors":"V. B. Khanzhy, D. Lyashenko","doi":"10.15802/ampr.v0i24.295485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to comprehend the Husserlian model of constituting temporal modes through the ability of intentional \"retentional-protentional\" consciousness, as well as to clarify the possibility of interpreting its positions in the reconstruction of the concept of anthropic time. Theoretical basis. The theoretical framework of the research includes: 1) the interpretation of the phenomenological reflection of \"time-consciousness\" by E. Husserl in the context of solving the problem of phased-differentiation of this form of temporality; 2) the concept of anthropic time (V. Khanzhy). Originality. For the first time in the research literature, the possibilities of applying the ideas of Husserl to the reconstruction of the concept of anthropic time are considered through the interpretation of the phenomenological solution to the problem of temporality, proposed and specified in Husserl’s \"time-consciousness\" concept. Conclusions. According to Husserl, the structure of human time-consciousness is instantiated in three spheres of passivity: prerefleсtive cogito, embodiment, and intersubjectivity. Within the framework of the problem of phase differentiation of phenomenological time, an analysis of the potencies of consciousness in constituting the phases of time-consciousness, namely protentional and retentional potencies, has been proposed. In the context of the reconstruction of the concept of anthropic time, several aspects of Husserl’s model of time-consciousness have been interpreted, including the paradoxical reconciliation of two quasi-incompatible ideas: the idea of the vagueness of the boundaries between temporal modes and the thesis of the formal capacity of preserving temporal units within their respective temporal phases. The property of multilevel complexity in the system of human temporality accounts for the diversity in the relationship of unique temporal units based on formal and content-related criteria ('temporal matryoshka').","PeriodicalId":42650,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i24.295485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to comprehend the Husserlian model of constituting temporal modes through the ability of intentional "retentional-protentional" consciousness, as well as to clarify the possibility of interpreting its positions in the reconstruction of the concept of anthropic time. Theoretical basis. The theoretical framework of the research includes: 1) the interpretation of the phenomenological reflection of "time-consciousness" by E. Husserl in the context of solving the problem of phased-differentiation of this form of temporality; 2) the concept of anthropic time (V. Khanzhy). Originality. For the first time in the research literature, the possibilities of applying the ideas of Husserl to the reconstruction of the concept of anthropic time are considered through the interpretation of the phenomenological solution to the problem of temporality, proposed and specified in Husserl’s "time-consciousness" concept. Conclusions. According to Husserl, the structure of human time-consciousness is instantiated in three spheres of passivity: prerefleсtive cogito, embodiment, and intersubjectivity. Within the framework of the problem of phase differentiation of phenomenological time, an analysis of the potencies of consciousness in constituting the phases of time-consciousness, namely protentional and retentional potencies, has been proposed. In the context of the reconstruction of the concept of anthropic time, several aspects of Husserl’s model of time-consciousness have been interpreted, including the paradoxical reconciliation of two quasi-incompatible ideas: the idea of the vagueness of the boundaries between temporal modes and the thesis of the formal capacity of preserving temporal units within their respective temporal phases. The property of multilevel complexity in the system of human temporality accounts for the diversity in the relationship of unique temporal units based on formal and content-related criteria ('temporal matryoshka').
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在人类时间概念的重构中解读胡塞尔的时间意识。第二部分
文章的目的在于理解胡塞尔通过意向性 "留存-意向 "意识能力构成时间模式的模式,并阐明在重建人学时间概念时解释其立场的可能性。理论基础。研究的理论框架包括1) 胡塞尔(E. Husserl)对 "时间意识 "现象学反思的解释,以解决这种时间性形式的阶段性差异问题;2) 人类时间概念(V. Khanzhy)。独创性。在研究文献中首次通过对胡塞尔的 "时间意识 "概念中提出和规定的时间性问题的现象学解决方案的解释,考虑了将胡塞尔的思想应用于重建人类时间概念的可能性。结论。胡塞尔认为,人类时间意识的结构体现在三个被动性领域中:前概念(prerefleсtive cogito)、体现(embodiment)和主体间性(intersubjectivity)。在现象学时间的阶段分化问题框架内,提出了对构成时间意识阶段的意识能动性,即原初能动性和保留能动性的分析。在重构人学时间概念的背景下,对胡塞尔时间意识模型的几个方面进行了阐释,其中包括两种准不相容思想的矛盾调和:时间模式之间界限模糊的思想和时间单位在各自时间阶段内保存的形式能力论。人类时间性系统的多层次复杂性属性说明了基于形式和内容相关标准("时间母题")的独特时间单元关系的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Freedom as a Key Value of the Volunteer Movement The Interpretation of Husserl’s Time-Consciousness in the Reconstruction of the Concept of Anthropic Time. Part Two Philosophical and Anthropological Foundations of Psychosynthesis by Roberto Assaggioli Man in Digitized Urban Socio-Cultural Space The Concept of Anthropotechnics in the Social and Humanitarian Dimension
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1