EXAMINING THE LINK BETWEEN MOTOR FITNESS AND MORPHOLOGY IN 10-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN

IF 0.2 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Kinesiologia Slovenica Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.52165/kinsi.29.3.62-74
Ivana Radin, Radenko Arsenijević, Živorad Marković, Filip Kojić
{"title":"EXAMINING THE LINK BETWEEN MOTOR FITNESS AND MORPHOLOGY IN 10-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN","authors":"Ivana Radin, Radenko Arsenijević, Živorad Marković, Filip Kojić","doi":"10.52165/kinsi.29.3.62-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between motor fitness and morphological factors, including anthropometric measurements and body composition, in a cohort of 10-year-old children. The sample consisted of 32 boys (mean age 10.24 ± 0.22 years, body height: 147.12 ± 6.11 cm, body mass: 42.14 ± 11.02 kg, body mass index: 19.41 ± 4.16 kg/m2) and 29 girls (mean age 10.12 ± 0.20 years, body height: 145.31 ± 7.68 cm, body mass: 40.10 ± 8.76 kg, body mass index: 18.91 ± 3.58 kg/m2). Anthropometric and body composition variables encompassed body height (BH), body mass (BM), body mass index (BMI), body fat mass (BFM), and free-fat mass (FFM). The motor fitness tests, designed to evaluate strength, coordination, speed and aerobic fitness, included standing long jump (SLJ), medicine ball throw (MBT), sit-ups in 30 seconds test (SUT), hand tapping test (HTT), obstacle course backwards test (OCB), and shuttle run test (SRT). While there were no notable differences between boys and girls in terms of morphology, for MBT (p = 0.011) and HTT (p = 0.016) fitness tests significant sex-differences were observed. Except HTT, all motor variables showed small to moderate correlations with morphological variables. Through the utilization of regression analysis, it was determined that BMI (r = 0.201 - 0.389) and BFM (r = 0.166 - 0.418) were the most influential predictor variables for the majority of motor variables. These findings suggest that anthropometry and body composition have a moderate impact on performance in motor tests that assess strength, body coordination, and aerobic fitness.","PeriodicalId":43206,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiologia Slovenica","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiologia Slovenica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52165/kinsi.29.3.62-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between motor fitness and morphological factors, including anthropometric measurements and body composition, in a cohort of 10-year-old children. The sample consisted of 32 boys (mean age 10.24 ± 0.22 years, body height: 147.12 ± 6.11 cm, body mass: 42.14 ± 11.02 kg, body mass index: 19.41 ± 4.16 kg/m2) and 29 girls (mean age 10.12 ± 0.20 years, body height: 145.31 ± 7.68 cm, body mass: 40.10 ± 8.76 kg, body mass index: 18.91 ± 3.58 kg/m2). Anthropometric and body composition variables encompassed body height (BH), body mass (BM), body mass index (BMI), body fat mass (BFM), and free-fat mass (FFM). The motor fitness tests, designed to evaluate strength, coordination, speed and aerobic fitness, included standing long jump (SLJ), medicine ball throw (MBT), sit-ups in 30 seconds test (SUT), hand tapping test (HTT), obstacle course backwards test (OCB), and shuttle run test (SRT). While there were no notable differences between boys and girls in terms of morphology, for MBT (p = 0.011) and HTT (p = 0.016) fitness tests significant sex-differences were observed. Except HTT, all motor variables showed small to moderate correlations with morphological variables. Through the utilization of regression analysis, it was determined that BMI (r = 0.201 - 0.389) and BFM (r = 0.166 - 0.418) were the most influential predictor variables for the majority of motor variables. These findings suggest that anthropometry and body composition have a moderate impact on performance in motor tests that assess strength, body coordination, and aerobic fitness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究 10 岁儿童运动能力与形态之间的联系
本研究旨在调查一组 10 岁儿童的运动能力与形态因素(包括人体测量和身体成分)之间的关系。样本包括 32 名男孩(平均年龄为 10.24±0.22 岁,身高:147.12±6.11 厘米,体重:42.14±11.02 千克,体质指数:42.14±11.02 千克):体重:42.14 ± 11.02 公斤,体重指数:19.41 ± 4.16 公斤:19.41 ± 4.16 kg/m2)和 29 名女孩(平均年龄为 10.12 ± 0.20 岁,身高: 145.31 ± 7.68 厘米,体重: 40.10 ± 8.76 kg/m2):体重:40.10 ± 8.76 千克,体重指数:18.91 ± 3.58 千克18.91 ± 3.58 kg/m2)。人体测量和身体成分变量包括身高(BH)、体质量(BM)、体质量指数(BMI)、体脂肪量(BFM)和游离脂肪量(FFM)。运动体能测试旨在评估力量、协调性、速度和有氧体能,包括立定跳远(SLJ)、投掷药球(MBT)、30 秒内仰卧起坐测试(SUT)、手拍击测试(HTT)、障碍倒退测试(OCB)和往返跑测试(SRT)。虽然男孩和女孩在形态上没有明显差异,但在 MBT(p = 0.011)和 HTT(p = 0.016)体能测试中却观察到了显著的性别差异。除 HTT 外,所有运动变量都与形态变量存在小到中等程度的相关性。通过回归分析,可以确定 BMI(r = 0.201 - 0.389)和 BFM(r = 0.166 - 0.418)是对大多数运动变量影响最大的预测变量。这些研究结果表明,人体测量和身体成分对评估力量、身体协调性和有氧体能的运动测试成绩有一定的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kinesiologia Slovenica
Kinesiologia Slovenica SPORT SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RECOVERY PRACTICES OF SLOVENIAN SPORT CLIMBERS EFFECT OF MANIPULATION OF BASE OF SUPPORT ON CENTER OF PRESSURE: COMPARISON OF CHILDREN WITH AND WITHOUT INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY EXAMINING THE LINK BETWEEN MOTOR FITNESS AND MORPHOLOGY IN 10-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN COGNITIVE CHARACTERISTICS AND SOME FACTORS AFFECTING THE SPRINT AND MEMORY COURSE PERFORMANCE OF ORIENTEERS A COMPARISON OF REPEATED WINGATE BASED OF HIGH INTENSITY INTERVAL TRAINING AND MODERATE INTENSITY CONTINUOUS TRAINING ON AEROBIC CAPACITY UNDER NORMOBARIC HYPOXIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1