How Decision Making Develops: Adolescents, Irrational Adults, and Should AI be Trusted With the Car Keys?

IF 3.4 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1177/23727322231220423
Sarah M. Edelson, Jordan E. Roue, Aadya Singh, Valerie F. Reyna
{"title":"How Decision Making Develops: Adolescents, Irrational Adults, and Should AI be Trusted With the Car Keys?","authors":"Sarah M. Edelson, Jordan E. Roue, Aadya Singh, Valerie F. Reyna","doi":"10.1177/23727322231220423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews the developmental literature on decision making, discussing how increased reliance on gist thinking explains the surprising finding that important cognitive biases increase from childhood to adulthood. This developmental trend can be induced experimentally by encouraging verbatim (younger) versus gist (older) ways of thinking. We then build on this developmental literature to assess the developmental stage of artificial intelligence (AI) and how its decision making compares with humans, finding that popular models are not only irrational but they sometimes resemble immature adolescents. To protect public safety and avoid risk, we propose that AI models build on policy frameworks already established to regulate other immature decision makers such as adolescents.","PeriodicalId":52185,"journal":{"name":"Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences","volume":"50 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322231220423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reviews the developmental literature on decision making, discussing how increased reliance on gist thinking explains the surprising finding that important cognitive biases increase from childhood to adulthood. This developmental trend can be induced experimentally by encouraging verbatim (younger) versus gist (older) ways of thinking. We then build on this developmental literature to assess the developmental stage of artificial intelligence (AI) and how its decision making compares with humans, finding that popular models are not only irrational but they sometimes resemble immature adolescents. To protect public safety and avoid risk, we propose that AI models build on policy frameworks already established to regulate other immature decision makers such as adolescents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决策是如何形成的?青少年、非理性的成年人以及人工智能是否应该被信任地保管车钥匙?
本文回顾了有关决策制定的发展文献,讨论了对要点思维依赖的增加如何解释重要认知偏差从童年到成年会增加这一惊人发现。通过鼓励逐字逐句(年轻时)与要点(年长时)思维方式的对比,可以在实验中诱发这种发展趋向。然后,我们在这一发展文献的基础上,评估人工智能(AI)的发展阶段及其决策制定与人类的比较,发现流行的模型不仅不合理,而且有时与不成熟的青少年相似。为了保护公共安全和避免风险,我们建议人工智能模型以已经建立的政策框架为基础,对青少年等其他不成熟的决策者进行监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Catalyzing Equity in STEM Teams: Harnessing Generative AI for Inclusion and Diversity. How Decision Making Develops: Adolescents, Irrational Adults, and Should AI be Trusted With the Car Keys? Supporting Multilingualism in Immigrant Children: An Integrative Approach Designing for Sensory Adaptation: What You See Depends on What You’ve Been Looking at - Recommendations, Guidelines and Standards Should Reflect This ED-AI Lit: An Interdisciplinary Framework for AI Literacy in Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1