Approaches and Models for Teaching Digital Ethics in Information Systems Courses – A Review of the Literature

IF 2.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Australasian Journal of Information Systems Pub Date : 2023-12-26 DOI:10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4517
M. Paltiel, Marc Cheong, Simon Coghlan, Reeva M. Lederman
{"title":"Approaches and Models for Teaching Digital Ethics in Information Systems Courses – A Review of the Literature","authors":"M. Paltiel, Marc Cheong, Simon Coghlan, Reeva M. Lederman","doi":"10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The value and importance of teaching Digital Ethics within Information Systems and ICT courses is widely recognized and stand-alone or integrated digital ethics units are broadly implemented across degree courses. However, how such courses should be taught and what content they should include is a little explored topic. Using a narrative literature review methodology, this paper reviews the pedagogical theories underpinning digital ethics courses discussed in the literature and outlines approaches that deploy standalone ethics units, integrated ethics teaching, and hybrid teaching approaches and the use of interdisciplinary models. The paper identifies the employment of, and emphasis given to various moral theories in digital ethics education. The paper then discusses how our findings relating to different pedagogical approaches, degree of integration of ethics teaching, the use of interdisciplinary models and use of moral theories—are related to each other. The discussion explores trends in approaches and models for teaching digital ethics highlighted in the review, and makes recommendations for further exploration and inquiry. It concludes that the effective teaching of digital ethics will likely involve a considered combination of approaches, models and techniques, which may also be tailored to the needs of different roles and industries.","PeriodicalId":45261,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Information Systems","volume":"9 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The value and importance of teaching Digital Ethics within Information Systems and ICT courses is widely recognized and stand-alone or integrated digital ethics units are broadly implemented across degree courses. However, how such courses should be taught and what content they should include is a little explored topic. Using a narrative literature review methodology, this paper reviews the pedagogical theories underpinning digital ethics courses discussed in the literature and outlines approaches that deploy standalone ethics units, integrated ethics teaching, and hybrid teaching approaches and the use of interdisciplinary models. The paper identifies the employment of, and emphasis given to various moral theories in digital ethics education. The paper then discusses how our findings relating to different pedagogical approaches, degree of integration of ethics teaching, the use of interdisciplinary models and use of moral theories—are related to each other. The discussion explores trends in approaches and models for teaching digital ethics highlighted in the review, and makes recommendations for further exploration and inquiry. It concludes that the effective teaching of digital ethics will likely involve a considered combination of approaches, models and techniques, which may also be tailored to the needs of different roles and industries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在信息系统课程中教授数字伦理的方法和模式--文献综述
在信息系统和信息与传播技术课程中教授数字伦理的价值和重要性已得到广泛认可, 独立或综合的数字伦理单元已在学位课程中得到广泛实施。然而,此类课程应如何讲授以及应包括哪些内容,却是一个鲜有探讨的话题。本文采用叙事性文献综述的方法,回顾了文献中讨论的数字伦理学课程的教学理论基础,概述了部署独立伦理学单元、综合伦理学教学、混合教学方法和使用跨学科模式的方法。本文指出了数字伦理学教育中各种道德理论的运用和侧重点。然后,本文讨论了我们在不同教学方法、伦理学教学的整合程度、跨学科模式的使用和道德理论的使用等方面的研究结果是如何相互关联的。讨论探讨了审查中强调的数字伦理学教学方法和模式的趋势,并提出了进一步探索和研究的建议。讨论得出的结论是,有效的数字伦理学教学很可能涉及各种方法、模式和技术的综合考 虑,这些方法、模式和技术也可能适合不同角色和行业的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Information Systems
Australasian Journal of Information Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
20
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Actors in Blockchain Adoption Decisions – An Innovation Translation Perspective Integrating Users’ Perceptions to Identify Features Indicating the Quality of Cancer-Related Podcasts Provided by Non-Profit Cancer Organisations Approaches and Models for Teaching Digital Ethics in Information Systems Courses – A Review of the Literature Effective Communication in Globally Distributed Scrum: A Model and Practical Guidance Investigating the Moderating Effect of Massively Multiplayer Online (MMO) Games on the Correlation Between Flow and Game Addiction: A Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1