Micromycetes associated with barley and their significance as pathogens in Russia

F. B. Gannibal, E. Poluektova, Y. V. Lukyanets, T. Gagkaeva, M. Gomzhina
{"title":"Micromycetes associated with barley and their significance as pathogens in Russia","authors":"F. B. Gannibal, E. Poluektova, Y. V. Lukyanets, T. Gagkaeva, M. Gomzhina","doi":"10.31993/2308-6459-2023-106-4-16116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the great attention paid to the study of barley diseases, inaccuracies in the names of diseases, their practical significance, and incorrect use of the scientific names of causal agents can be commonly found in the scientific literature. This may lead to confusion and misidentification of the pathogens that can affect this crop especially as relates to phytosanitary requirements. This review continues the series started with a publication devoted to wheat diseases. This review includes information about the main barley diseases and pathogenic organisms causing them, as well as the species emerging as a potential threat to barley. The current taxonomic status of fungal species and fungal-like organisms associated with various organs of barley is given, and the breadth of their distribution and degree of impact on the crop are summarized. The micromycetes were divided into two groups according to their phytosanitary importance. The first group is represented by fungi of great importance as the pathogens causing the 29 economically important common barley diseases. The second group consists of fungi causing 20 minor and poorly studied diseases with unconfirmed harmfulness, or potential endophytic fungi. Perceptions of their ability to cause disease remain controversial and the available data require confirmation. This dataset can be used as a reference for a more accurate description of the phytosanitary situation. The review will also be helpful for more targeted studies using molecular techniques to clarify taxonomy and areals of fungi associated with barley and to provide more detailed data on disease damage in this crop.","PeriodicalId":20414,"journal":{"name":"PLANT PROTECTION NEWS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLANT PROTECTION NEWS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31993/2308-6459-2023-106-4-16116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the great attention paid to the study of barley diseases, inaccuracies in the names of diseases, their practical significance, and incorrect use of the scientific names of causal agents can be commonly found in the scientific literature. This may lead to confusion and misidentification of the pathogens that can affect this crop especially as relates to phytosanitary requirements. This review continues the series started with a publication devoted to wheat diseases. This review includes information about the main barley diseases and pathogenic organisms causing them, as well as the species emerging as a potential threat to barley. The current taxonomic status of fungal species and fungal-like organisms associated with various organs of barley is given, and the breadth of their distribution and degree of impact on the crop are summarized. The micromycetes were divided into two groups according to their phytosanitary importance. The first group is represented by fungi of great importance as the pathogens causing the 29 economically important common barley diseases. The second group consists of fungi causing 20 minor and poorly studied diseases with unconfirmed harmfulness, or potential endophytic fungi. Perceptions of their ability to cause disease remain controversial and the available data require confirmation. This dataset can be used as a reference for a more accurate description of the phytosanitary situation. The review will also be helpful for more targeted studies using molecular techniques to clarify taxonomy and areals of fungi associated with barley and to provide more detailed data on disease damage in this crop.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与大麦有关的小霉菌及其在俄罗斯作为病原体的重要性
尽管对大麦病害的研究受到了极大的关注,但在科学文献中仍经常可以发现病害名称、病害的实际意义以及病原物学名的错误使用。这可能会导致混淆和错误识别可能影响这种作物的病原体,特别是与植物检疫要求有关的病原体。本综述是小麦病害系列出版物的延续。本综述包括有关主要大麦病害和引起这些病害的病原生物的信息,以及新出现的对大麦构成潜在威胁的物种。文中介绍了与大麦各器官相关的真菌物种和类真菌生物的分类现状,并总结了它们的分布范围和对作物的影响程度。根据植物检疫的重要性,小霉菌被分为两类。第一类由具有重要意义的真菌代表,它们是导致 29 种经济上重要的常见大麦病害的病原体。第二组由真菌组成,这些真菌可引起 20 种次要的、研究不足的病害,其危害性尚未得到证实,或者是潜在的内生真菌。对其致病能力的看法仍有争议,现有数据需要确认。该数据集可作为参考,以便更准确地描述植物检疫情况。该综述还有助于利用分子技术开展更有针对性的研究,以明确与大麦相关的真菌的分类和分布,并提供有关该作物病害的更详细数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determination of Trichogramma euproctidis efficacy against the key pest, European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the Aegean region vineyards, Turkey The toxic effect of α-tomatine on the 28-spotted potato ladybeetle Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Susceptibility of Bombyx mori larvae to the microsporidium Nosema bombycis from the silkworm and Nosema sp. from the cotton bollworm Micromycetes associated with barley and their significance as pathogens in Russia The potential of plant antimicrobial peptides for crop protection against diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1