Exploring the Role of Institutional Governance in Climate Action in the Western Balkans Economies

Eirini Triarchi, Georgios Kolias, Efstratios Kypriotelis
{"title":"Exploring the Role of Institutional Governance in Climate Action in the Western Balkans Economies","authors":"Eirini Triarchi, Georgios Kolias, Efstratios Kypriotelis","doi":"10.24818/ejis.2023.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new United Nations (UN) sustainable development (SD) agenda in 2015 heralded the beginning of a new global effort for the planet's sustainability through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They provide a framework for all countries, regardless of income levels, to guide national planning for achieving SD. Climate change may impact almost all SDGs and vice versa, though, of the 17 SDGs, the 13th is designated to climate action. The growing concern for environmental degradation has raised the question of how countries will manage to achieve SDGs and whether the answer can be found in their institutions. Reducing emissions necessitates environmental policies influenced by political institutions that shape policy adoption and implementation. This paper aims to analyze the effects of institutions adopting the dimensions of good governance on particular SDG indicators of the 13th SDG by using a Nonparametric Kernel Regression framework and a panel data set of 5 Western Balkans (WB) countries from 2000 to 2020. The target countries share the ambition of EU accession and hold the EU candidate status. WB countries spark our interest because of the severe institutional governance problems, which limit their ability to progress towards SDGs. The paper's empirical analysis uses a specific SDG indicator for the 13 SDG of the Europe Sustainable Development Report, similar to that used by the OECD for the report on Measuring Distance to the SDG Targets. The analysis includes as independent variables the World Governance Indicators (WGI). Contributing to the existing literature on institutions and SD, the novelty of our approach is the use of the WGI with SDG indicators in measuring the impact of quality of governance on the progress towards the 13th SDG referring to climate action.","PeriodicalId":36073,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/ejis.2023.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The new United Nations (UN) sustainable development (SD) agenda in 2015 heralded the beginning of a new global effort for the planet's sustainability through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They provide a framework for all countries, regardless of income levels, to guide national planning for achieving SD. Climate change may impact almost all SDGs and vice versa, though, of the 17 SDGs, the 13th is designated to climate action. The growing concern for environmental degradation has raised the question of how countries will manage to achieve SDGs and whether the answer can be found in their institutions. Reducing emissions necessitates environmental policies influenced by political institutions that shape policy adoption and implementation. This paper aims to analyze the effects of institutions adopting the dimensions of good governance on particular SDG indicators of the 13th SDG by using a Nonparametric Kernel Regression framework and a panel data set of 5 Western Balkans (WB) countries from 2000 to 2020. The target countries share the ambition of EU accession and hold the EU candidate status. WB countries spark our interest because of the severe institutional governance problems, which limit their ability to progress towards SDGs. The paper's empirical analysis uses a specific SDG indicator for the 13 SDG of the Europe Sustainable Development Report, similar to that used by the OECD for the report on Measuring Distance to the SDG Targets. The analysis includes as independent variables the World Governance Indicators (WGI). Contributing to the existing literature on institutions and SD, the novelty of our approach is the use of the WGI with SDG indicators in measuring the impact of quality of governance on the progress towards the 13th SDG referring to climate action.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索机构治理在西巴尔干经济体气候行动中的作用
2015 年联合国(UN)新的可持续发展(SD)议程预示着通过可持续发展目标(SDGs)实现地球可持续发展的新的全球努力的开始。这些目标为所有国家(无论其收入水平如何)提供了一个框架,用以指导实现可持续发展的国家规划。气候变化可能影响几乎所有的可持续发展目标,反之亦然,不过,在 17 项可持续发展目标中,第 13 项被指定为气候行动。对环境退化的日益关注提出了各国如何实现可持续发展目标的问题,以及是否能在其机构中找到答案。要减少排放,就必须制定受政治体制影响的环境政策,而政治体制会影响政策的通过和实施。本文旨在通过使用非参数核回归框架和 2000 年至 2020 年 5 个西巴尔干(WB)国家的面板数据集,分析采用善治维度的机构对第 13 个可持续发展目标的特定可持续发展目标指标的影响。这些目标国家都有加入欧盟的雄心,并拥有欧盟候选国地位。我们之所以对西巴尔干国家感兴趣,是因为这些国家存在严重的机构治理问题,这限制了它们实现可持续发展目标的能力。本文的实证分析使用了《欧洲可持续发展报告》中 13 个可持续发展目标的特定可持续发展目标指标,与经合组织在《衡量与可持续发展目标的距离》报告中使用的指标类似。分析将世界治理指标(WGI)作为自变量。我们的方法的新颖之处在于将世界治理指标(WGI)与可持续发展目标(SDG)指标相结合,以衡量治理质量对实现有关气候行动的第 13 个可持续发展目标的进展的影响,这是对有关机构和可持续发展的现有文献的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Role of Institutional Governance in Climate Action in the Western Balkans Economies Smart City Strategies in Slovak Cities Determining a Revenue Generating Model that Creates Customer Value by Using a Skip-the-line Application in Romania State and Entrepreneurship on the Road to Green Growth in a Post Lignite Era: Friends or Foes? Awareness of Unethical Artificial Intelligence and its Mitigation Measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1