Foundations of African Perceptions on Security and Violence. Overlapping the Need for Peace with the Narratives of Struggle, a Safe Way or an African Way?

Diana Sfetlana Stoica
{"title":"Foundations of African Perceptions on Security and Violence. Overlapping the Need for Peace with the Narratives of Struggle, a Safe Way or an African Way?","authors":"Diana Sfetlana Stoica","doi":"10.24193/subbeuropaea.2023.2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Would western defined security be an African security and would this reproduce, or develop, from indigenous African ontologies, so that African understanding of security and violence could actually bestow to the global peacekeeping actions? Considering this research question, focused on the understanding of security and violence in an African postcolonial and maybe de-colonial taxonomy, the present paper invites to reflect on the evolution of the concepts of security and violence in African scholarships, their connections with the sustainable African social development narratives that seem to monopolize the space of debates in African Studies. Moreover, the intentions are to explore the disruptions between the need for peace and the narratives of struggle in the context of a critical resistance to the global connecting and disconnecting biases that define the conceptual “security” and “violence”. This content analysis and critical look on the becoming of the term of violence, at the base of a typical evolution of the term security, in African literature or African focused debates, might contribute to defining that security and violence are floating terms, their understanding in an African taxonomy should be Africanized, being highlighted that security includes violence as inner boosting element, that allows for the two to be in a strange relationship, recalling for attentive consideration and critics on the application of Western inspired peacekeeping actions that do not take into account specific conditions such as territory and culture. Keywords: violence, security, (de) coloniality, resistance, signifier\"","PeriodicalId":507019,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Studia Europaea","volume":"87 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Studia Europaea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2023.2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Would western defined security be an African security and would this reproduce, or develop, from indigenous African ontologies, so that African understanding of security and violence could actually bestow to the global peacekeeping actions? Considering this research question, focused on the understanding of security and violence in an African postcolonial and maybe de-colonial taxonomy, the present paper invites to reflect on the evolution of the concepts of security and violence in African scholarships, their connections with the sustainable African social development narratives that seem to monopolize the space of debates in African Studies. Moreover, the intentions are to explore the disruptions between the need for peace and the narratives of struggle in the context of a critical resistance to the global connecting and disconnecting biases that define the conceptual “security” and “violence”. This content analysis and critical look on the becoming of the term of violence, at the base of a typical evolution of the term security, in African literature or African focused debates, might contribute to defining that security and violence are floating terms, their understanding in an African taxonomy should be Africanized, being highlighted that security includes violence as inner boosting element, that allows for the two to be in a strange relationship, recalling for attentive consideration and critics on the application of Western inspired peacekeeping actions that do not take into account specific conditions such as territory and culture. Keywords: violence, security, (de) coloniality, resistance, signifier"
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲人对安全和暴力看法的基础。和平需求与斗争叙事重叠,安全之道还是非洲之道?
"西方定义的安全是否就是非洲的安全,这种安全是否会从非洲本土的本体论中再现或发展出来,从而使非洲对安全和暴力的理解能够真正赋予全球维和行动?考虑到这一研究问题的重点是在非洲后殖民或许是非殖民主义分类法中对安全与暴力的理解,本文希望反思非洲奖学金中安全与暴力概念的演变,以及它们与似乎垄断了非洲研究辩论空间的非洲可持续社会发展叙事之间的联系。此外,本文意在探讨和平需求与斗争叙事之间的干扰,批判性地抵制界定 "安全 "和 "暴力 "概念的全球联系和脱节偏见。在非洲文学或以非洲为重点的辩论中,在安全一词典型演变的基础上,对暴力一词的内容分析和批判性审视,可能有助于界定安全和暴力是浮动的术语,它们在非洲分类学中的理解应非洲化,强调安全包括作为内在促进因素的暴力,这使得两者处于一种奇怪的关系中,回顾西方启发的维和行动的应用,并对其进行认真的思考和批评,这些行动没有考虑到特定的条件,如领土和文化。关键词:暴力、安全、(去)殖民化、抵抗、符号"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mémoire, nostalgie et « la fin de l’utopie » à l’âge du « présentisme » Der Aufstieg des Rechtspopulismus in Rumänien On Mercenaries in World Politics Sufism in the Modern and Contemporary Iranian Politics The Crises in Post-War Education in Cluj
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1