“... is an open access, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal”: How open-access journals describe themselves in their “Aims and Scope” statements

Ibérica Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.17398/2340-2784.46.33
An Cheng
{"title":"“... is an open access, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal”: How open-access journals describe themselves in their “Aims and Scope” statements","authors":"An Cheng","doi":"10.17398/2340-2784.46.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open access journals (OAJs) have been celebrated for freeing research from paywalls and increasing the visibility of research results beyond disciplinary, academic, or financial boundaries. They have been recognized as an important part of the Open Science (OS) ecology. However, they are still viewed by some with skepticism. Given these conflicting perceptions, it would be important for LSP researchers and practitioners to understand OAJs better as they may need to work with students who are or will be part of the OS movement. Examining how open access journals describe themselves in their “Aims and Scope” (A&S) statement is a worthwhile step in this direction. I analyzed the A&S statements of 104 OAJs and 104 subscription-based journals. I conducted thematic analysis aided by NVivo. Although both groups of journals include some broad themes in their A&S statements, there are some observable differences in the way they describe their scope and promote themselves. Using the concept of the prestige economy, I offer two theoretical insights: the OAJs journals may be selfconsciously and purposefully responding to the expectations of the prestige economy. Meanwhile, they may be redefining what is relevant in such an economy.","PeriodicalId":503127,"journal":{"name":"Ibérica","volume":"181 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibérica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.46.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open access journals (OAJs) have been celebrated for freeing research from paywalls and increasing the visibility of research results beyond disciplinary, academic, or financial boundaries. They have been recognized as an important part of the Open Science (OS) ecology. However, they are still viewed by some with skepticism. Given these conflicting perceptions, it would be important for LSP researchers and practitioners to understand OAJs better as they may need to work with students who are or will be part of the OS movement. Examining how open access journals describe themselves in their “Aims and Scope” (A&S) statement is a worthwhile step in this direction. I analyzed the A&S statements of 104 OAJs and 104 subscription-based journals. I conducted thematic analysis aided by NVivo. Although both groups of journals include some broad themes in their A&S statements, there are some observable differences in the way they describe their scope and promote themselves. Using the concept of the prestige economy, I offer two theoretical insights: the OAJs journals may be selfconsciously and purposefully responding to the expectations of the prestige economy. Meanwhile, they may be redefining what is relevant in such an economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"......是一份开放存取、同行评审的学术期刊":开放存取期刊如何在 "宗旨与范围 "声明中描述自己
开放存取期刊(OAJs)使研究摆脱了付费墙的束缚,使研究成果的可见度超越了学科、学术或财务的界限,因而备受赞誉。它们已被视为开放科学(OS)生态的重要组成部分。然而,仍有一些人对它们持怀疑态度。鉴于这些相互矛盾的看法,LSP 研究人员和从业人员必须更好地了解开放存取期刊,因为他们可能需要与正在或将要参与开放科学运动的学生合作。研究开放存取期刊如何在其 "目标与范围"(A&S)声明中描述自己,是朝这个方向迈出的值得一试的一步。我分析了 104 种开放存取期刊和 104 种订阅期刊的 "目标与范围 "声明。我在 NVivo 的辅助下进行了专题分析。尽管这两类期刊在其A&S声明中都包含一些广泛的主题,但它们在描述自己的范围和宣传自己的方式上存在一些明显的差异。利用声望经济的概念,我提出了两点理论见解:OAJs 期刊可能在有意识地回应声望经济的期望。与此同时,它们可能正在重新定义与这种经济相关的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Whose stance is it, anyway? A corpus-based study of stance expressions in science news articles Genre in English Medical Writing, 1500-1820. Sociocultural Contexts of Production and Use, edited by Irma Taavitsainen, Turo Hiltunen, Jeremy J. Smith & Carla Suhr Coherence features of published research articles by Japanese authors: Culture-specific features and their acceptability Exploring Iranian ESP teachers’ language-related critical incidents Communication for Specific Purposes as translingual
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1