The Effectiveness of the Problem Based Flipped Classroom Model with E-Modules in Improving Critical Thinking Skills of Pre-Service Physics Teachers

S. Sutrio, A. Busyairi, Aris Doyan, K. Kosim, H. Hikmawati
{"title":"The Effectiveness of the Problem Based Flipped Classroom Model with E-Modules in Improving Critical Thinking Skills of Pre-Service Physics Teachers","authors":"S. Sutrio, A. Busyairi, Aris Doyan, K. Kosim, H. Hikmawati","doi":"10.29303/jpft.v9i2.5826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical thinking skills are one of four skills that students must have in the 21st century. However, several research results show that students' critical thinking skills in Indonesia are still very low. This research aims to test the effectiveness of the Problem-Based Flipped Classroom (PBFC) model assisted by e-Modules in improving the critical thinking skills of prospective physics teachers. This type of research is quasi-experimental with a non-equivalent control group design. The research was conducted at the Physics Education Study Program at the University of Mataram. The research subjects consisted of 52 prospective physics teachers who were studying Basic Physics I. Data was collected using a critical thinking skills test given before and after treatment. The results of data analysis show that the average score of critical thinking skills of prospective physics teachers in the experimental class and control class both increased to the moderate category with N-Gain scores of 0.63 and 0.48 respectively. Based on the results of the t-test at the 95% confidence level with the degree of freedom dk= 52 it shows that there is a significant difference in the increase in Critical Thinking Skills between the experimental class and the control class with a value of tcount= 2.21 with a value of ttable = 2.01 . Apart from that, based on the results of the effect size calculation, it shows that the effectiveness of the E-Module assisted PBFC model in improving students' critical thinking skills relative to the conventional model is different in the large category. In other words, the PBFC model assisted by e-modules can be used as an alternative learning in the classroom to improve the critical thinking skills of prospective physics teachers or students in general.","PeriodicalId":507194,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","volume":"407 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v9i2.5826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical thinking skills are one of four skills that students must have in the 21st century. However, several research results show that students' critical thinking skills in Indonesia are still very low. This research aims to test the effectiveness of the Problem-Based Flipped Classroom (PBFC) model assisted by e-Modules in improving the critical thinking skills of prospective physics teachers. This type of research is quasi-experimental with a non-equivalent control group design. The research was conducted at the Physics Education Study Program at the University of Mataram. The research subjects consisted of 52 prospective physics teachers who were studying Basic Physics I. Data was collected using a critical thinking skills test given before and after treatment. The results of data analysis show that the average score of critical thinking skills of prospective physics teachers in the experimental class and control class both increased to the moderate category with N-Gain scores of 0.63 and 0.48 respectively. Based on the results of the t-test at the 95% confidence level with the degree of freedom dk= 52 it shows that there is a significant difference in the increase in Critical Thinking Skills between the experimental class and the control class with a value of tcount= 2.21 with a value of ttable = 2.01 . Apart from that, based on the results of the effect size calculation, it shows that the effectiveness of the E-Module assisted PBFC model in improving students' critical thinking skills relative to the conventional model is different in the large category. In other words, the PBFC model assisted by e-modules can be used as an alternative learning in the classroom to improve the critical thinking skills of prospective physics teachers or students in general.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于问题的翻转课堂模式与电子模块对提高职前物理教师批判性思维能力的有效性
批判性思维能力是 21 世纪学生必须具备的四种能力之一。然而,多项研究结果表明,印尼学生的批判性思维能力仍然很低。本研究旨在检验在电子模块辅助下的基于问题的翻转课堂(PBFC)模式在提高未来物理教师的批判性思维能力方面的有效性。这类研究是采用非等效对照组设计的准实验研究。研究在马打兰大学物理教育研究项目中进行。研究对象包括 52 名正在学习基础物理 I 的准物理教师。数据收集采用的是治疗前后的批判性思维能力测试。数据分析结果表明,实验班和对照班的准物理教师的批判性思维能力平均分都提高到了中等水平,N-Gain 分值分别为 0.63 和 0.48。根据自由度 dk= 52、置信度为 95% 的 t 检验结果显示,实验班和对照班的批判性思维能力的提高有显著差异,tcount= 2.21,ttable= 2.01。除此之外,根据效应大小的计算结果,可以看出,相对于传统模式,E-Module辅助PBFC模式在提高学生批判性思维能力方面的效果在大类上是不同的。换言之,电子模块辅助的 PBFC 模式可作为课堂上的另一种学习方式,以提高未来物理教师或一般学生的批判性思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Assessments to Measure Students' Science Literacy Ability: Rasch Modeling Analysis Problem-Solving Proficiency Profile in Problem-Based Learning Model for Eighth-Grade Students on the Subject of Pressure in Matter Implementation of Problem Based Learning on Physics Learning Outcomes of Students at MAN 1 Makassar The Effect of Character and Local Wisdom-Integrated Causalitic Model Learning on Problem-Solving Skills and the Development of Environmental Conservation Literacy The ‘Fisika Gasing’: Enhancing Kinematics Understanding and Student Satisfaction in a Biology Education at Mataram University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1