Student Perception of Online Judges in Learning Problem Solving through Introductory Programming

Ritwik Murali, Akash Ravi, Kailashnath Nagendran, Veeramanohar Avudaiappan
{"title":"Student Perception of Online Judges in Learning Problem Solving through Introductory Programming","authors":"Ritwik Murali, Akash Ravi, Kailashnath Nagendran, Veeramanohar Avudaiappan","doi":"10.1145/3627217.3627230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple strategies exist while attempting to introduce problem-solving to engineering students. One of the popular strategies is to encourage problem-solving through the introductory programming course. This paper presents an in-depth analysis of the extent to which online judging-based evaluation and training strategies can be employed to effectively deliver introductory programming courses. The paper focuses on student perceptions of learning as a measure to gauge their confidence in problem-solving and programming. With responses from over 400 students across departments and in various stages of the undergraduate program, this paper discusses a detailed analysis of student perceptions of learning, their comfort levels, and confidence when using online judge based evaluation strategies. Results show that a majority of students believe that online judges assist them to improve their problem solving and programming skills.","PeriodicalId":508655,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM India Compute Conference","volume":"4 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM India Compute Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3627217.3627230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple strategies exist while attempting to introduce problem-solving to engineering students. One of the popular strategies is to encourage problem-solving through the introductory programming course. This paper presents an in-depth analysis of the extent to which online judging-based evaluation and training strategies can be employed to effectively deliver introductory programming courses. The paper focuses on student perceptions of learning as a measure to gauge their confidence in problem-solving and programming. With responses from over 400 students across departments and in various stages of the undergraduate program, this paper discusses a detailed analysis of student perceptions of learning, their comfort levels, and confidence when using online judge based evaluation strategies. Results show that a majority of students believe that online judges assist them to improve their problem solving and programming skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对在线法官通过程序设计入门学习解决问题的看法
在尝试向工科学生介绍解决问题的方法时,存在多种策略。其中一种流行的策略是通过编程入门课程鼓励学生解决问题。本文深入分析了基于在线评判的评估和培训策略在多大程度上可用于有效讲授编程入门课程。本文重点关注学生的学习感知,以此衡量他们对解决问题和编程的信心。通过 400 多名来自不同院系、处于本科课程不同阶段的学生的反馈,本文详细分析了学生的学习感知、他们的舒适度以及使用基于在线评判的评价策略时的信心。结果显示,大多数学生认为在线评委有助于提高他们的问题解决能力和编程技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Forum Factor: Exploring the Link between Online Discourse and Student Achievement in Higher Education Evaluating the difficulty for novice engineers in learning and using Transition Systems for modeling software systems Impacting the Submission Timing of Student Work Using Gamification From Learning Outcomes to Competencies based Computing Curricula for India Learning to Rank for Search Results Re-ranking in Learning Experience Platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1