De-Legitimating the Russian War in Ukraine in US President Biden’s Speeches: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Mervat Ahmed
{"title":"De-Legitimating the Russian War in Ukraine in US President Biden’s Speeches: A Critical Discourse Analysis","authors":"Mervat Ahmed","doi":"10.21608/ttaip.2023.331321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study adopts a critical discourse analysis approach to examine the strategies employed by US President Joe Biden in his speeches to de-legitimize the Russian war in Ukraine that started in 2022. The study applies van Leeuwen’s (2007) (de) legitimation strategies model. Two speeches, extracted from the White House official website and delivered by President Biden on two different occasions during the first few months of the war being waged, are analyzed. The results reveal US President Biden’s tendency to rely mainly on three de-legitimation categories. The most frequently employed strategy is moral evaluation through evaluative modifiers and abstraction. The second most frequent strategy is authorization mainly through authority of conformity, in addition to impersonal and personal authority. Finally, both instrumental and theoretical rationalization are employed to delegitimate the Russian war in Ukraine and legitimize the US assistance provided to it.","PeriodicalId":276703,"journal":{"name":"Textual Turnings: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal in English Studies","volume":"54 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Textual Turnings: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal in English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ttaip.2023.331321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study adopts a critical discourse analysis approach to examine the strategies employed by US President Joe Biden in his speeches to de-legitimize the Russian war in Ukraine that started in 2022. The study applies van Leeuwen’s (2007) (de) legitimation strategies model. Two speeches, extracted from the White House official website and delivered by President Biden on two different occasions during the first few months of the war being waged, are analyzed. The results reveal US President Biden’s tendency to rely mainly on three de-legitimation categories. The most frequently employed strategy is moral evaluation through evaluative modifiers and abstraction. The second most frequent strategy is authorization mainly through authority of conformity, in addition to impersonal and personal authority. Finally, both instrumental and theoretical rationalization are employed to delegitimate the Russian war in Ukraine and legitimize the US assistance provided to it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国总统拜登演讲中的俄罗斯乌克兰战争去合法化:批判性话语分析
本研究采用批判性话语分析方法,研究美国总统乔-拜登在其演讲中为使俄罗斯于 2022 年在乌克兰发动的战争合法化而采取的策略。研究采用了 van Leeuwen(2007)的(de)合法化策略模型。研究分析了从白宫官方网站上提取的两篇演讲,这两篇演讲是拜登总统在战争爆发的头几个月在两个不同场合发表的。结果显示,美国总统拜登倾向于主要依赖三种去合法化策略。最常使用的策略是通过评价性修饰词和抽象概念进行道德评价。第二种最常用的策略是授权,主要是通过一致性权威,此外还有非个人权威和个人权威。最后,工具合理化和理论合理化都被用来使俄罗斯在乌克兰的战争合法化,并使美国向其提供的援助合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gendered Space in Seamus Heaney's Death of a Naturalist (1966) and Ahmed Abdel Muti Hijazi’s A Heartless City (1959): A Feminist Geo-Critical Approach Empowering Nature and Women: Ecofeminist Analysis of Atwood's The Edible Woman and Watson's Tiny Sunbirds Faraway The Trickster as Savior in Charles Johnson’s Middle Passage Reporting the Iraq War: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Stylistic Analysis of Selected English Translations of Iraq War Poetry Staging Absence: Postdramatic Aesthetics in Martin Crimp’s Attempts on Her Life (1997/2007) & Rabie Mroué and Linah Saneh’s 33 Rpm and Few Seconds (2013)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1