The Samoyed languages and the prehistory of Western Siberia (notes on the dissertation of A. Y. Urmanchieva)

V.V. Napolskikh
{"title":"The Samoyed languages and the prehistory of Western Siberia (notes on the dissertation of A. Y. Urmanchieva)","authors":"V.V. Napolskikh","doi":"10.25205/2312-6337-2023-4-71-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author examines the problems of the ancient ethnic history of Western Siberia, focusing on the history of internal and external relations of Samoyed languages considered in the dissertation “Reconstruction of the linguistic landscape of Western Siberia (based on the materials of Samoyed languages)” recently defended by A. Y. Urmanchieva. The study of the languages and prehistory of Western Siberia requires a new generalization of the materials accumulated over the last 20–30 years and therefore the dissertation looks timely. The linguistic argumentation and conclusions of the dissertation are very thorough, as a rule acceptable, and can provide a basis for such a generalization. However, numerous etymologies proposed in the dissertation should be critically assessed, with corrections, new interpretations, and approaches to be offered. In particular, more attention should be paid to the external relations of Samoyed languages with Ugrian and Yenisei languages. The prehistorical interpretation of linguistic data in the dissertation seems questionable, raising concerns about the actual meaning of the Stammbaum scheme, the need to take into account divergent, convergent, and contact language processes, the role of groups without living daughter languages in prehistory, the importance of geographical and typological coverage, and the inclusion of data from early written sources, archaeology, and other disciplines for better understanding ancient ethno-linguistic processes.","PeriodicalId":112261,"journal":{"name":"Languages and Folklore of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia","volume":"94 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages and Folklore of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/2312-6337-2023-4-71-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author examines the problems of the ancient ethnic history of Western Siberia, focusing on the history of internal and external relations of Samoyed languages considered in the dissertation “Reconstruction of the linguistic landscape of Western Siberia (based on the materials of Samoyed languages)” recently defended by A. Y. Urmanchieva. The study of the languages and prehistory of Western Siberia requires a new generalization of the materials accumulated over the last 20–30 years and therefore the dissertation looks timely. The linguistic argumentation and conclusions of the dissertation are very thorough, as a rule acceptable, and can provide a basis for such a generalization. However, numerous etymologies proposed in the dissertation should be critically assessed, with corrections, new interpretations, and approaches to be offered. In particular, more attention should be paid to the external relations of Samoyed languages with Ugrian and Yenisei languages. The prehistorical interpretation of linguistic data in the dissertation seems questionable, raising concerns about the actual meaning of the Stammbaum scheme, the need to take into account divergent, convergent, and contact language processes, the role of groups without living daughter languages in prehistory, the importance of geographical and typological coverage, and the inclusion of data from early written sources, archaeology, and other disciplines for better understanding ancient ethno-linguistic processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
萨摩耶语言和西西伯利亚的史前史(A. Y. Urmanchieva 的论文注释)
作者研究了西西伯利亚古代民族史问题,重点是阿-亚-乌尔曼奇耶娃(A. Y. Urmanchieva)最近通过答辩的论文《西西伯利亚语言景观的重建(基于萨摩耶语材料)》中考虑的萨摩耶语内外关系史。对西西伯利亚语言和史前史的研究需要对过去二三十年积累的材料进行新的归纳,因此该论文显得非常及时。论文的语言学论证和结论非常透彻,通常是可以接受的,可以为这种归纳提供基础。不过,论文中提出的许多词源都应进行批判性评估,并提出更正、新的解释和方法。特别是,应更多地关注萨摩耶语与乌戈尔语和叶尼塞语的外部关系。论文中对语言数据的史前阐释似乎值得商榷,这引起了人们对 Stammbaum 方案的实际意义、考虑分化、趋同和接触语言过程的必要性、没有活的子代语言的群体在史前中的作用、地理和类型学覆盖范围的重要性,以及纳入早期文字资料、考古学和其他学科的数据以更好地理解古代民族语言过程等问题的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hydronyms of the north of Kamchatka and their comprehension in the Koryak oral tradition The image of earth spirit in the olonkho epic. Part 2: Mythological origins Intonation of simple interrogative statements in the Altai language Russian borrowings in Tuvan colloquial speech Functioning of different types of predicates in the Tuvan language in narrative discourse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1