{"title":"The Samoyed languages and the prehistory of Western Siberia (notes on the dissertation of A. Y. Urmanchieva)","authors":"V.V. Napolskikh","doi":"10.25205/2312-6337-2023-4-71-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author examines the problems of the ancient ethnic history of Western Siberia, focusing on the history of internal and external relations of Samoyed languages considered in the dissertation “Reconstruction of the linguistic landscape of Western Siberia (based on the materials of Samoyed languages)” recently defended by A. Y. Urmanchieva. The study of the languages and prehistory of Western Siberia requires a new generalization of the materials accumulated over the last 20–30 years and therefore the dissertation looks timely. The linguistic argumentation and conclusions of the dissertation are very thorough, as a rule acceptable, and can provide a basis for such a generalization. However, numerous etymologies proposed in the dissertation should be critically assessed, with corrections, new interpretations, and approaches to be offered. In particular, more attention should be paid to the external relations of Samoyed languages with Ugrian and Yenisei languages. The prehistorical interpretation of linguistic data in the dissertation seems questionable, raising concerns about the actual meaning of the Stammbaum scheme, the need to take into account divergent, convergent, and contact language processes, the role of groups without living daughter languages in prehistory, the importance of geographical and typological coverage, and the inclusion of data from early written sources, archaeology, and other disciplines for better understanding ancient ethno-linguistic processes.","PeriodicalId":112261,"journal":{"name":"Languages and Folklore of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia","volume":"94 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages and Folklore of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/2312-6337-2023-4-71-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The author examines the problems of the ancient ethnic history of Western Siberia, focusing on the history of internal and external relations of Samoyed languages considered in the dissertation “Reconstruction of the linguistic landscape of Western Siberia (based on the materials of Samoyed languages)” recently defended by A. Y. Urmanchieva. The study of the languages and prehistory of Western Siberia requires a new generalization of the materials accumulated over the last 20–30 years and therefore the dissertation looks timely. The linguistic argumentation and conclusions of the dissertation are very thorough, as a rule acceptable, and can provide a basis for such a generalization. However, numerous etymologies proposed in the dissertation should be critically assessed, with corrections, new interpretations, and approaches to be offered. In particular, more attention should be paid to the external relations of Samoyed languages with Ugrian and Yenisei languages. The prehistorical interpretation of linguistic data in the dissertation seems questionable, raising concerns about the actual meaning of the Stammbaum scheme, the need to take into account divergent, convergent, and contact language processes, the role of groups without living daughter languages in prehistory, the importance of geographical and typological coverage, and the inclusion of data from early written sources, archaeology, and other disciplines for better understanding ancient ethno-linguistic processes.
作者研究了西西伯利亚古代民族史问题,重点是阿-亚-乌尔曼奇耶娃(A. Y. Urmanchieva)最近通过答辩的论文《西西伯利亚语言景观的重建(基于萨摩耶语材料)》中考虑的萨摩耶语内外关系史。对西西伯利亚语言和史前史的研究需要对过去二三十年积累的材料进行新的归纳,因此该论文显得非常及时。论文的语言学论证和结论非常透彻,通常是可以接受的,可以为这种归纳提供基础。不过,论文中提出的许多词源都应进行批判性评估,并提出更正、新的解释和方法。特别是,应更多地关注萨摩耶语与乌戈尔语和叶尼塞语的外部关系。论文中对语言数据的史前阐释似乎值得商榷,这引起了人们对 Stammbaum 方案的实际意义、考虑分化、趋同和接触语言过程的必要性、没有活的子代语言的群体在史前中的作用、地理和类型学覆盖范围的重要性,以及纳入早期文字资料、考古学和其他学科的数据以更好地理解古代民族语言过程等问题的关注。