Construction Legislation – Current and Future in the Legal System of the Slovak Republic

E. Marišová, Kristian Hodossy, Ladislav Mura
{"title":"Construction Legislation – Current and Future in the Legal System of the Slovak Republic","authors":"E. Marišová, Kristian Hodossy, Ladislav Mura","doi":"10.2478/eual-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The importance of addressing the effective functioning of competence execution in the construction sector primarily lies in its impact on the efficiency and quality of these competences. Currently, in Slovakia (SR), municipalities exercise the competences of spatial planning and building regulations within their transferred competence from the state. Through the government’s program statement for the years 2020–2024, the SR government committed to abolish municipal building authorities. With the new legislation that becomes effective on April 1, 2024, there will be a reverse transfer of construction competence from municipalities to state administration, to the newly created Office for Spatial Planning and Construction of the Slovak Republic and regional building authorities.The authors take a critical approach to the original construction legislation (de lege lata) as well as to the newly adopted laws on construction and spatial planning in terms of substantive and procedural provisions, noting the exclusion of the application of Administrative Code in spatial and building proceedings. Through our research on this issue, we suggest de lege ferenda two alternatives regarding the exercise of construction competences at the municipal and state levels and the preservation of dual jurisdiction in building proceedings according to the current administrative procedure.","PeriodicalId":213841,"journal":{"name":"EU agrarian Law","volume":"238 ","pages":"22 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EU agrarian Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/eual-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The importance of addressing the effective functioning of competence execution in the construction sector primarily lies in its impact on the efficiency and quality of these competences. Currently, in Slovakia (SR), municipalities exercise the competences of spatial planning and building regulations within their transferred competence from the state. Through the government’s program statement for the years 2020–2024, the SR government committed to abolish municipal building authorities. With the new legislation that becomes effective on April 1, 2024, there will be a reverse transfer of construction competence from municipalities to state administration, to the newly created Office for Spatial Planning and Construction of the Slovak Republic and regional building authorities.The authors take a critical approach to the original construction legislation (de lege lata) as well as to the newly adopted laws on construction and spatial planning in terms of substantive and procedural provisions, noting the exclusion of the application of Administrative Code in spatial and building proceedings. Through our research on this issue, we suggest de lege ferenda two alternatives regarding the exercise of construction competences at the municipal and state levels and the preservation of dual jurisdiction in building proceedings according to the current administrative procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯洛伐克共和国法律体系中的建筑立法--现状与未来
摘要 解决建筑部门能力执行的有效运作问题的重要性主要在于其对这些能力的效率和质量的影响。目前,在斯洛伐克(SR),市政当局在国家移交的权限范围内行使空间规划和建筑法规的权限。在 2020-2024 年的政府计划声明中,斯洛伐克政府承诺取消市政建筑管理局。随着新立法于 2024 年 4 月 1 日生效,建筑权限将从市政当局逆向转移至国家行政机构、新成立的斯洛伐克共和国空间规划和建筑办公室以及地区建筑管理局。作者从实体和程序规定的角度,对原有建筑立法(现行法)以及新通过的建筑和空间规划法律进行了批判,并指出在空间和建筑程序中排除了《行政法》的适用。通过对这一问题的研究,我们从拟议法的角度提出了两个备选方案,即在市政和州一级行使建筑权限,以及根据现行行政程序在建筑诉讼中保留双重管辖权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Benefits, Challenges and Legal Regulation of Precision Farming in the European Union New Legislation on the Lease of Agricultural Land by the Municipality The Development of Drone Techology and its Regulation in the European Union Construction Legislation – Current and Future in the Legal System of the Slovak Republic Agricultural Crises – Selected Legal Aspects of Drought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1