A Review of Eugenia Roussou, Orthodox Christianity, New Age Spirituality and Vernacular Religion: The Evil Eye in Greece. London: Bloombsbury, 2021, XII+196 pp.

Q3 Social Sciences Antropologicheskij Forum Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.31250/1815-8870-2023-19-59-185-196
I. Nikitina
{"title":"A Review of Eugenia Roussou, Orthodox Christianity, New Age Spirituality and Vernacular Religion: The Evil Eye in Greece. London: Bloombsbury, 2021, XII+196 pp.","authors":"I. Nikitina","doi":"10.31250/1815-8870-2023-19-59-185-196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eugenia Roussou studies the phenomenon of the evil eye in Greece. Based on long-term fieldwork in Thessaloniki and Rethymno, her main claims are that religious attitudes in contemporary Greece are a result of significant shift. In her opinion, Orthodoxy and New Age spirituality are not now “at cultural war”, and attitudes to the evil eye are the finest example of this reconciliation. Unfortunately, the entire text is nothing more than an illustration. The ethnographic descriptions are rich, but rather one-sided. Almost all of author’s interlocutors were neutral or positive towards New Age and new religious movements. Also, Roussou did not include interviews with priests in her research, which significantly distorted the picture. The theoretical framework of this monograph goes against the described material, because of the author’s desire to avoid all sorts of contradictions. She claims to adopt the framework of vernacular religiosity in her monograph, but does not follow this line either in terms or in material.","PeriodicalId":52194,"journal":{"name":"Antropologicheskij Forum","volume":"47 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antropologicheskij Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2023-19-59-185-196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eugenia Roussou studies the phenomenon of the evil eye in Greece. Based on long-term fieldwork in Thessaloniki and Rethymno, her main claims are that religious attitudes in contemporary Greece are a result of significant shift. In her opinion, Orthodoxy and New Age spirituality are not now “at cultural war”, and attitudes to the evil eye are the finest example of this reconciliation. Unfortunately, the entire text is nothing more than an illustration. The ethnographic descriptions are rich, but rather one-sided. Almost all of author’s interlocutors were neutral or positive towards New Age and new religious movements. Also, Roussou did not include interviews with priests in her research, which significantly distorted the picture. The theoretical framework of this monograph goes against the described material, because of the author’s desire to avoid all sorts of contradictions. She claims to adopt the framework of vernacular religiosity in her monograph, but does not follow this line either in terms or in material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 Eugenia Roussou 的评论:《东正教、新纪元灵性和乡土宗教》:希腊的邪恶之眼》。伦敦:布鲁姆伯里,2021 年,XII+196 页。
Eugenia Roussou 研究了希腊的邪眼现象。根据在塞萨洛尼基和雷切诺的长期实地调查,她的主要观点是,当代希腊的宗教态度发生了重大转变。在她看来,东正教和新纪元精神现在并非 "文化战争",而对邪眼的态度正是这种和解的最好例证。遗憾的是,整篇文章不过是图文并茂。人种学描述内容丰富,但却相当片面。几乎所有作者的对话者都对新纪元和新宗教运动持中立或积极态度。此外,Roussou 的研究中没有包括对牧师的访谈,这极大地扭曲了研究结果。这本专著的理论框架与所述材料背道而驰,因为作者希望避免各种矛盾。她声称在其专著中采用了乡土宗教性的框架,但在术语和材料上都没有遵循这一路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antropologicheskij Forum
Antropologicheskij Forum Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
On Leviathan’s Tail: Anthropological Studies of Bureaucracy and Bureaucrats From Call to Emergency Card: Looking for Discretion of “112” Operators A Review of O. P. Kolomiets, I. I. Krupnik (eds.), Applied Ethnology in Chukotka: Indigenous Knowledge, Museums, Cultural Heritage (Celebrating the 125th Anniversary of Nikolai L. Gondatti’s 1895 Trip to the Chukchi Peninsula). Moscow: PressPass, 2020, 468 pp. Bureaucratic Routes and Documentary Temporalities of a Conscript Questionnaire in a Human Rights Organization Universal Rules and Discretionary Situations: How Do Street-Level Bureaucrats Calculate Suffering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1