Characterization of Mixed Rice: Nutritional Value, Physicochemical Properties, Organoleptic, and Glycemic Index

IF 0.2 Q4 AGRONOMY agriTECH Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.22146/agritech.78074
E. Septianingrum, S. D. Ardhiyanti, Liyanan Liyanan, B. Kusbiantoro, Dody Dwi Handoko
{"title":"Characterization of Mixed Rice: Nutritional Value, Physicochemical Properties, Organoleptic, and Glycemic Index","authors":"E. Septianingrum, S. D. Ardhiyanti, Liyanan Liyanan, B. Kusbiantoro, Dody Dwi Handoko","doi":"10.22146/agritech.78074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nutritional and physicochemical value of rice could be enhanced by mixing or combining white and brown rice with various beans. Besides nutritional and functional aspects, it is also crucial to consider organoleptic properties. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize nutritional value (proximate), physicochemical properties, organoleptic and Glycemic Index (GI) of mixed rice. A total of 10 mixed rice formulas, ranging from F1 to F10, and consisting of white rice, brown rice, black rice, aromatic rice, sticky rice, black-eyed peas and mung beans, were determined. These samples were analyzed for proximate, total phenolic compounds, pasting properties, and organoleptic tests (hedonic and ranking tests). Furthermore, 3 selected formulas based on the previous test were then evaluated for GI, and Glycemic Load (GL) was calculated. The results showed that adding black-eyed peas and mung beans (F9 and F10) increased the protein content of mixed rice while higher proportion of black or brown rice (F3 and F4) enhanced the fat content. The amylose content was decreased due to higher proportion of sticky rice (F6 and F8). Based on the hedonic test, the F1-F6 formula had a favorable rating. The ranking results indicated that F9 was better than F10, while F1 and F6 was the best among F1 to F4, as well as F5 to F8. Considering the constituent materials, F1, F6, F9 and commercial low GI rice were selected and tested for GI, and the test results showed 48.2, 54.7, 78.0, and 60.3, respectively. As a result, F1 and F6 have the potential to be developed as mixed rice because they have good nutritional value, physicochemical and organoleptic properties, as well as low GI.","PeriodicalId":7563,"journal":{"name":"agriTECH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"agriTECH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/agritech.78074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nutritional and physicochemical value of rice could be enhanced by mixing or combining white and brown rice with various beans. Besides nutritional and functional aspects, it is also crucial to consider organoleptic properties. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize nutritional value (proximate), physicochemical properties, organoleptic and Glycemic Index (GI) of mixed rice. A total of 10 mixed rice formulas, ranging from F1 to F10, and consisting of white rice, brown rice, black rice, aromatic rice, sticky rice, black-eyed peas and mung beans, were determined. These samples were analyzed for proximate, total phenolic compounds, pasting properties, and organoleptic tests (hedonic and ranking tests). Furthermore, 3 selected formulas based on the previous test were then evaluated for GI, and Glycemic Load (GL) was calculated. The results showed that adding black-eyed peas and mung beans (F9 and F10) increased the protein content of mixed rice while higher proportion of black or brown rice (F3 and F4) enhanced the fat content. The amylose content was decreased due to higher proportion of sticky rice (F6 and F8). Based on the hedonic test, the F1-F6 formula had a favorable rating. The ranking results indicated that F9 was better than F10, while F1 and F6 was the best among F1 to F4, as well as F5 to F8. Considering the constituent materials, F1, F6, F9 and commercial low GI rice were selected and tested for GI, and the test results showed 48.2, 54.7, 78.0, and 60.3, respectively. As a result, F1 and F6 have the potential to be developed as mixed rice because they have good nutritional value, physicochemical and organoleptic properties, as well as low GI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杂交水稻的特征:营养价值、理化特性、感官和升糖指数
通过将白米和糙米与各种豆类混合或组合,可以提高大米的营养和理化价值。除了营养和功能方面,感官特性也很重要。因此,本研究旨在分析混合米的营养价值(近似值)、理化特性、感官和升糖指数(GI)。共测定了 10 种混合米配方,从 F1 到 F10 不等,由白米、糙米、黑米、香米、糯米、豇豆和绿豆组成。对这些样品进行了近似物、总酚类化合物、糊化性能和感官测试(享乐测试和等级测试)。此外,还根据之前的测试结果对 3 种选定配方进行了 GI 评估,并计算了血糖生成负荷(GL)。结果显示,添加豇豆和绿豆(F9 和 F10)增加了混合米饭的蛋白质含量,而较高比例的黑米或糙米(F3 和 F4)增加了脂肪含量。由于糯米(F6 和 F8)比例较高,直链淀粉含量降低。根据享乐测试,F1-F6 配方获得了良好的评价。排序结果表明,F9 优于 F10,而 F1 和 F6 是 F1 至 F4 以及 F5 至 F8 中最好的。考虑到组成材料,选择 F1、F6、F9 和商品低 GI 大米进行 GI 测试,测试结果分别为 48.2、54.7、78.0 和 60.3。结果表明,F1 和 F6 具有良好的营养价值、理化和感官特性以及低 GI,因此有潜力开发成混合米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
agriTECH
agriTECH AGRONOMY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of Bread with The Substitution of Fermented Purple Yam Flour (Dioscorea alata) Characterization of Mixed Rice: Nutritional Value, Physicochemical Properties, Organoleptic, and Glycemic Index Effect of Priming on Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis (Bok Choy) Seeds Germination Effects of Extraction Temperature on Polyphenol Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Golden Bladderwort (Utricularia aurea) Whey Protein-Pectin Conjugate by Wet-Dry Heating: Optimization using Response Surface Methodology with Box-Behnken Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1