The Determinants of Participation in Economic Activities in Old Age: Focusing on Depression and Life Satisfaction

Young-Shin Kim, Jungran Han, Nam Lee, Mi Eun Kim
{"title":"The Determinants of Participation in Economic Activities in Old Age: Focusing on Depression and Life Satisfaction","authors":"Young-Shin Kim, Jungran Han, Nam Lee, Mi Eun Kim","doi":"10.31748/kseg.2023.9.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare differences in socio-demographic characteristics, depression, and life satisfaction between the elderly participating and the non-participating in economic activities, and to identify variables that affect participation in economic activities in old age. For the purpose, we conducted Chi-square test, t-Test, Pearson correlation analysis, and Binomial logistic regression analysis on the raw data of 10,097 people over 65 years old from 『Survey on the Status of the Elderly in 2020』. The main results were as follows : 1) There were higher proportion of subjects male, younger, higher educated, with a spouse, with higher income, with good subjective health, and living with a spouse in the participating group than in the non-participating economic activity group. In addition, the participating group in economic activities had higher satisfaction with health status, economic status, social-leisure-cultural activities, relationships with friends or community, and life as a whole, and lower depression. 2) As a result of the binomial logistic regression analysis, the model was statistically significant and had an explanatory power of 24.0%. All variables except satisfaction with economic status were significant factors influencing participation in economic activities in old age. The elderly male, younger, less-educated, living alone, higher-income, higher satisfaction with health status and relationships with friends or community, lower satisfaction with social-leisure-cultural activities and life as a whole, and with lower depression were more likely to participate in economic activities. Finally, based on the results of this study, several limitations and suggestions for follow-up research and policy direction were added.","PeriodicalId":383648,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society of Educational Gerontology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society of Educational Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31748/kseg.2023.9.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare differences in socio-demographic characteristics, depression, and life satisfaction between the elderly participating and the non-participating in economic activities, and to identify variables that affect participation in economic activities in old age. For the purpose, we conducted Chi-square test, t-Test, Pearson correlation analysis, and Binomial logistic regression analysis on the raw data of 10,097 people over 65 years old from 『Survey on the Status of the Elderly in 2020』. The main results were as follows : 1) There were higher proportion of subjects male, younger, higher educated, with a spouse, with higher income, with good subjective health, and living with a spouse in the participating group than in the non-participating economic activity group. In addition, the participating group in economic activities had higher satisfaction with health status, economic status, social-leisure-cultural activities, relationships with friends or community, and life as a whole, and lower depression. 2) As a result of the binomial logistic regression analysis, the model was statistically significant and had an explanatory power of 24.0%. All variables except satisfaction with economic status were significant factors influencing participation in economic activities in old age. The elderly male, younger, less-educated, living alone, higher-income, higher satisfaction with health status and relationships with friends or community, lower satisfaction with social-leisure-cultural activities and life as a whole, and with lower depression were more likely to participate in economic activities. Finally, based on the results of this study, several limitations and suggestions for follow-up research and policy direction were added.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人参与经济活动的决定因素:关注抑郁和生活满意度
本研究的目的是比较参与和不参与经济活动的老年人在社会人口特征、抑郁和生活满意度方面的差异,并找出影响老年人参与经济活动的变量。为此,我们对《2020 年老年人状况调查》中 10 097 名 65 岁以上老年人的原始数据进行了卡方检验、t 检验、皮尔逊相关分析和二项式逻辑回归分析。主要结果如下1)与未参加经济活动组相比,参加经济活动组中男性、年轻、受教育程度高、有配偶、收入高、主观健康状况良好、与配偶同住的比例更高。此外,参与经济活动组对健康状况、经济状况、社会-休闲-文化活动、与朋友或社区的关系以及整体生活的满意度较高,抑郁程度较低。2)二项式逻辑回归分析结果表明,该模型具有显著的统计学意义,解释力为 24.0%。除对经济状况的满意度外,其他变量都是影响老年人参与经济活动的重要因素。男性老年人、年龄较小、教育程度较低、独居、收入较高、对健康状况和与朋友或社区关系的满意度较高、对社会-休闲-文化活动和整体生活的满意度较低、抑郁程度较低者更有可能参与经济活动。最后,根据本研究的结果,补充了一些局限性以及对后续研究和政策方向的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparisons of changes in income and expenditures in old age for single-person households and married couple' households: Focusing on differences between 2010 and 2020 Research on revitalizing the operation of literacy education institutions recognized by middle-aged and older adults: Focusing on literacy education institutions recognized by chungbuk The Determinants of Participation in Economic Activities in Old Age: Focusing on Depression and Life Satisfaction Development of Home-Training Exercise to Improve Lower Physical Function of the Elderly Women (using baseball massage and self-resistance exercise) The Effects of Self-Integrity on Successful Aging of the Elderly Participating in Literacy Education: Mediating Effects of Social Isolation and Moderated Mediating Effects of Hope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1