The use of metaphors to construct crisis discourses in describing COVID-19 vaccines in the Chinese and the American news media

IF 1.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Language and Politics Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1075/jlp.22153.lu
Gaoqiang Lu, Yating Yu
{"title":"The use of metaphors to construct crisis discourses in describing COVID-19 vaccines in the Chinese and the American news media","authors":"Gaoqiang Lu, Yating Yu","doi":"10.1075/jlp.22153.lu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been limited studies comparing Chinese and American news media in their descriptions of vaccines, especially their use of metaphors in the context of COVID-19. Hence, this paper employs a corpus-assisted critical approach to examine the metaphors used in constructing crisis discourses relating to vaccines in Chinese and American newspapers. The study reveals four conceptual metaphors: WEAPON, MACHINE, TRAVELLER, and CONTEST. The usage of these metaphors is intertwined with wider discursive contexts, which are shaped by the two countries’ distinct journalistic and geopolitical/sociocultural contexts. These have resulted in the adoption of different strategies for handling the COVID-19 crisis, reflecting the ideologies of collectivism in China and capitalism in America. The study highlights the significance of metaphors in shaping the ideologies of governments and/or the public towards vaccines through news media. Additionally, this paper provides a useful framework for comparing metaphor usage in two large corpora using Wmatrix.","PeriodicalId":51676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Politics","volume":"87 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22153.lu","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There have been limited studies comparing Chinese and American news media in their descriptions of vaccines, especially their use of metaphors in the context of COVID-19. Hence, this paper employs a corpus-assisted critical approach to examine the metaphors used in constructing crisis discourses relating to vaccines in Chinese and American newspapers. The study reveals four conceptual metaphors: WEAPON, MACHINE, TRAVELLER, and CONTEST. The usage of these metaphors is intertwined with wider discursive contexts, which are shaped by the two countries’ distinct journalistic and geopolitical/sociocultural contexts. These have resulted in the adoption of different strategies for handling the COVID-19 crisis, reflecting the ideologies of collectivism in China and capitalism in America. The study highlights the significance of metaphors in shaping the ideologies of governments and/or the public towards vaccines through news media. Additionally, this paper provides a useful framework for comparing metaphor usage in two large corpora using Wmatrix.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中美新闻媒体在描述 COVID-19 疫苗时使用隐喻构建危机话语
对中美两国新闻媒体在描述疫苗事件,尤其是在 COVID-19 事件中使用隐喻的情况进行比较的研究十分有限。因此,本文采用语料库辅助批判的方法来研究中美报纸在构建与疫苗相关的危机话语时所使用的隐喻。研究揭示了四个概念隐喻:武器"、"机器"、"旅行者 "和 "竞赛"。这些隐喻的使用与更广泛的话语背景交织在一起,而两国不同的新闻和地缘政治/社会文化背景又塑造了这些隐喻。这导致两国在处理 COVID-19 危机时采取了不同的策略,反映了中国的集体主义和美国的资本主义意识形态。本研究强调了隐喻在通过新闻媒体塑造政府和/或公众对疫苗的意识形态方面的重要性。此外,本文还为使用 Wmatrix 比较两个大型语料库中隐喻的使用情况提供了一个有用的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Political homophobia The construction of Hong Kong’s “one country, two systems” in China Daily Rickety democracies From “them” to “us”? The use of metaphors to construct crisis discourses in describing COVID-19 vaccines in the Chinese and the American news media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1