An Exploratory Study on Performance Indicators of Arts and Cultural Social Enterprises

HeeWon Moon, WoongJo Chang
{"title":"An Exploratory Study on Performance Indicators of Arts and Cultural Social Enterprises","authors":"HeeWon Moon, WoongJo Chang","doi":"10.52564/jamp.2023.68.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arts and cultural social enterprises are organizations that create diverse social values through cultural activities. This study aims to explore performance indicators for arts and cultural social enterprises to enhance our understanding of their performance and investigate their sustainability. To this end, we reviewed and synthesized literature on arts and cultural social enterprises both domestically and internationally, focusing on the Social Value Index (SVI) and the Art & Culture Social Performance Evaluation Model (ARC-SPEM) currently in use. This synthesis informed the proposal of new performance indicators spanning social, economic, and artistic dimensions. Subsequently, a survey among arts and cultural social enterprise experts and a hierarchical analysis process (AHP) were conducted. The analysis highlighted the relatively recognized importance of social performance indicators compared to economic and artistic ones. ‘Cultural welfare and appreciation’ and ‘arts and cultural education’ emerged as priorities in the social dimension; ‘providing jobs for artists’ was prominent in the economic dimension; and ‘art as a social activity’—which employs art to generate diverse values— was underscored in the artistic dimension. However, a case study on the current performance measurement practices of arts and cultural social enterprises in Korea revealed inconsistencies in the criteria, terminology, and categories used across organizations, along with a lack of comprehensive quantitative and qualitative data for appropriate performance assessment. We conclude that to ensure the sustainability of arts and cultural social enterprises, it is crucial to concurrently consider the peculiarities of art jobs, donations and sponsorships, service-oriented activities, and genre-specific value chains from social, economic, and artistic perspectives. Furthermore, artistic performance indicators not only impact artistic outputs but also influence social and economic outcomes, highlighting the need to acknowledge each organization’s unique artistic nature. This study’s significance lies in its systematic and comprehensive identification of performance indicators, acknowledging the unique attributes of arts and cultural social enterprises. It provides a foundation for revisiting previously overlooked performance metrics and facilitates communication with various stakeholders by introducing new artistic performance indicators tailored to the arts and cultural sector.","PeriodicalId":424388,"journal":{"name":"Korean Arts Association of Arts Management","volume":" 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Arts Association of Arts Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52564/jamp.2023.68.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arts and cultural social enterprises are organizations that create diverse social values through cultural activities. This study aims to explore performance indicators for arts and cultural social enterprises to enhance our understanding of their performance and investigate their sustainability. To this end, we reviewed and synthesized literature on arts and cultural social enterprises both domestically and internationally, focusing on the Social Value Index (SVI) and the Art & Culture Social Performance Evaluation Model (ARC-SPEM) currently in use. This synthesis informed the proposal of new performance indicators spanning social, economic, and artistic dimensions. Subsequently, a survey among arts and cultural social enterprise experts and a hierarchical analysis process (AHP) were conducted. The analysis highlighted the relatively recognized importance of social performance indicators compared to economic and artistic ones. ‘Cultural welfare and appreciation’ and ‘arts and cultural education’ emerged as priorities in the social dimension; ‘providing jobs for artists’ was prominent in the economic dimension; and ‘art as a social activity’—which employs art to generate diverse values— was underscored in the artistic dimension. However, a case study on the current performance measurement practices of arts and cultural social enterprises in Korea revealed inconsistencies in the criteria, terminology, and categories used across organizations, along with a lack of comprehensive quantitative and qualitative data for appropriate performance assessment. We conclude that to ensure the sustainability of arts and cultural social enterprises, it is crucial to concurrently consider the peculiarities of art jobs, donations and sponsorships, service-oriented activities, and genre-specific value chains from social, economic, and artistic perspectives. Furthermore, artistic performance indicators not only impact artistic outputs but also influence social and economic outcomes, highlighting the need to acknowledge each organization’s unique artistic nature. This study’s significance lies in its systematic and comprehensive identification of performance indicators, acknowledging the unique attributes of arts and cultural social enterprises. It provides a foundation for revisiting previously overlooked performance metrics and facilitates communication with various stakeholders by introducing new artistic performance indicators tailored to the arts and cultural sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于艺术和文化社会企业绩效指标的探索性研究
文化艺术社会企业是通过文化活动创造各种社会价值的组织。本研究旨在探讨文化艺术社会企业的绩效指标,以加强我们对其绩效的理解,并调查其可持续性。为此,我们回顾并综合了国内外有关文化艺术社会企业的文献,重点研究了目前正在使用的社会价值指数(SVI)和文化艺术社会绩效评估模型(ARC-SPEM)。通过这一综合研究,提出了涵盖社会、经济和艺术层面的新绩效指标。随后,对艺术和文化社会企业专家进行了调查,并采用了层次分析法(AHP)。分析结果表明,与经济和艺术指标相比,社会绩效指标的重要性相对得到认可。文化福利与鉴赏 "和 "艺术与文化教育 "成为社会维度中的优先指标;"为艺术家提供就业 "在经济维度中占据突出位置;而 "艺术作为一种社会活动"--利用艺术产生不同的价值--在艺术维度中得到强调。然而,一项关于韩国艺术和文化社会企业当前绩效衡量实践的案例研究显示,各组织使用的标准、术语和类别不一致,而且缺乏用于适当绩效评估的全面定量和定性数据。我们的结论是,为了确保艺术和文化社会企业的可持续性,必须同时从社会、经济和艺术的角度考虑艺术工作、捐赠和赞助、以服务为导向的活动以及特定流派价值链的特殊性。此外,艺术绩效指标不仅会影响艺术产出,还会影响社会和经济成果,这就凸显了承认每个组织独特艺术性质的必要性。本研究的意义在于系统而全面地确定了绩效指标,承认了艺术和文化社会企业的独特属性。它为重新审视以前被忽视的绩效指标奠定了基础,并通过引入针对文化艺术领域的新艺术绩效指标,促进了与各利益相关方的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural Entrepreneurship in Adverse Times: Lin Hwai-min, Founder of Taiwan Cloud Gate Dance Theatre A study on Nam June Paik's Electronic Super Highways : Focusing on the report 「Media Planning for the Post Industrial Age」(1974) and Paik's practice A Study on Relationship between the Cultural Budget and Local Policy Orientation Empirical analysis of the Social Effects of the Cultural City Project : The Case of the Chuncheon Cultural City Project “Dosiga Salon” A Study on the Evaluation index and Components of ESG Management of Culture and Arts Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1