Legal Status In The Donbas Conflicts: Foreign Fighters, Mercenaries, Far-Right Radicals

Ömer Faruk Gök
{"title":"Legal Status In The Donbas Conflicts: Foreign Fighters, Mercenaries, Far-Right Radicals","authors":"Ömer Faruk Gök","doi":"10.52273/sduhfd..1378211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On January 6, 2021, an armed group of about two thousand people, who could not accept the loss of the election of former President Donald Trump, stormed the US Capitol. David C. Rapoport, who received many references to the wave theory of his in terrorism studies, penned an article on the Capitol Attack and said that he wondered what could happen when far-right actions coalesce into big movements. February 23, 2022, as the United Nations Security Council convened to resolve the ongoing tension between Russia and Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized the entry of the Russian Army into Ukraine on television screens. He said the 'special operation' was carried out under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. The Donbas Conflict, which has been going on since 2014, seems to have presented a historic opportunity to the far-right radicals. Special military forces, foreign fighters, far-right radicals, terrorist organizations, states used force/violence. The conflicts attracted the attention of far-right radicals, and radicals found ample scope for legitimate use and access to the means of violence. The aim of the study is to present the legal framework of the space created by the Donbas Conflicts for far-right radicals. For this purpose, the legal framework applicable to the conflict will be drawn, the rights and authorities granted to the actors within this legal framework will be determined, and it will be investigated what kind of freedom the far-right radicals have achieved within this legal framework.","PeriodicalId":510856,"journal":{"name":"Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52273/sduhfd..1378211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On January 6, 2021, an armed group of about two thousand people, who could not accept the loss of the election of former President Donald Trump, stormed the US Capitol. David C. Rapoport, who received many references to the wave theory of his in terrorism studies, penned an article on the Capitol Attack and said that he wondered what could happen when far-right actions coalesce into big movements. February 23, 2022, as the United Nations Security Council convened to resolve the ongoing tension between Russia and Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized the entry of the Russian Army into Ukraine on television screens. He said the 'special operation' was carried out under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. The Donbas Conflict, which has been going on since 2014, seems to have presented a historic opportunity to the far-right radicals. Special military forces, foreign fighters, far-right radicals, terrorist organizations, states used force/violence. The conflicts attracted the attention of far-right radicals, and radicals found ample scope for legitimate use and access to the means of violence. The aim of the study is to present the legal framework of the space created by the Donbas Conflicts for far-right radicals. For this purpose, the legal framework applicable to the conflict will be drawn, the rights and authorities granted to the actors within this legal framework will be determined, and it will be investigated what kind of freedom the far-right radicals have achieved within this legal framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顿巴斯冲突中的法律地位:外国战斗人员、雇佣兵、极右激进分子
2021 年 1 月 6 日,约两千人组成的武装团体因无法接受前总统唐纳德-特朗普的选举失利而冲进美国国会大厦。大卫-C-拉波波特(David C. Rapoport)在恐怖主义研究中多次引用他的波浪理论,他就国会大厦袭击事件撰文称,他想知道当极右翼行动凝聚成大运动时会发生什么。2022 年 2 月 23 日,当联合国安理会召开会议以解决俄罗斯和乌克兰之间持续的紧张局势时,俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔-普京在电视屏幕上授权俄罗斯军队进入乌克兰。他说,这次 "特别行动 "是根据《联合国宪章》第五十一条进行的。 顿巴斯冲突自 2014 年以来一直在持续,这似乎为极右激进分子提供了一个历史性机遇。特种军事部队、外国战士、极右激进分子、恐怖组织、国家都使用了武力/暴力。这些冲突吸引了极右激进分子的注意力,激进分子找到了合法使用和获取暴力手段的广阔空间。本研究旨在介绍顿巴斯冲突为极右激进分子创造的空间的法律框架。为此,将绘制适用于冲突的法律框架,确定在此法律框架内赋予行为者的权利和权力,并调查极右激进分子在此法律框架内获得了何种自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Yetkisiz Temsilci ile Hukuki İşlem Yapan Üçüncü Kişinin Korunmasına İlişkin TBK m. 41/II, 42/III ve 45 Hükümlerinin Değerlendirilmesi Deprem Özelinde Afetlerde Hayvanlar ve İdarenin Sorumluluğu ANONİM ŞİRKET YÖNETİM KURULUNDA BELİRLİ GRUPLARIN TEMSİL EDİLMESİ Adil Yargılamayı Etkilemeye Teşebbüs Suçu (TCK m. 288) ile Yargı Görevi Yapanı, Bilirkişiyi veya Tanığı Etkilemeye Teşebbüs Suçunun (TCK m. 277) Karşılaştırmalı İncelemesi Limited Şirketlerde İki Kişilik Müdürler Kurulunda Müdürlerden Birisinin Müdürlük Sıfatının Sona Ermesinin Sonuçları
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1