Measuring the educational gradient of period fertility in 28 European countries: A new approach based on parity-specific fertility estimates

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Demographic Research Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.4054/demres.2023.49.34
Angela Greulich, Laurent Toulemon
{"title":"Measuring the educational gradient of period fertility in 28 European countries: A new approach based on parity-specific fertility estimates","authors":"Angela Greulich, Laurent Toulemon","doi":"10.4054/demres.2023.49.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measures of fertility by level of female education are currently only available for cohorts who have already completed childbearing age. In this article, we provide more timely measures of the educational gradient of fertility for Europe. To measure period fertility by education for the whole set of European countries, we mobilize data from the European Union’s Survey of Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC). A semi-retrospective approach serves to observe parity-specific fertility behavior of cohorts that are currently at childbearing age, while at the same time recording the educational level correctly. Bayesian statistics allow obtaining credible intervals for the age, education-and parity specific birth probabilities for each country. These birth probabilities are then combined into a multi-state life table to obtain parity-specific and total birth intensities by education. A post-stratification of birth probabilities leads us to be consistent with national fertility estimates. We reveal if there are significant differences between education groups in fertility within each European country, in how far these differentials vary between European countries and if heterogeneity in period fertility behavior is larger among the higher or the lower educated across Europe. We also show for which parity the heterogeneity between education groups is the largest. This study is based on data from Eurostat, EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions [2011,2012,2013]. The responsibility for all conclusions drawn from the data lies entirely with the authors.","PeriodicalId":48242,"journal":{"name":"Demographic Research","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demographic Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2023.49.34","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measures of fertility by level of female education are currently only available for cohorts who have already completed childbearing age. In this article, we provide more timely measures of the educational gradient of fertility for Europe. To measure period fertility by education for the whole set of European countries, we mobilize data from the European Union’s Survey of Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC). A semi-retrospective approach serves to observe parity-specific fertility behavior of cohorts that are currently at childbearing age, while at the same time recording the educational level correctly. Bayesian statistics allow obtaining credible intervals for the age, education-and parity specific birth probabilities for each country. These birth probabilities are then combined into a multi-state life table to obtain parity-specific and total birth intensities by education. A post-stratification of birth probabilities leads us to be consistent with national fertility estimates. We reveal if there are significant differences between education groups in fertility within each European country, in how far these differentials vary between European countries and if heterogeneity in period fertility behavior is larger among the higher or the lower educated across Europe. We also show for which parity the heterogeneity between education groups is the largest. This study is based on data from Eurostat, EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions [2011,2012,2013]. The responsibility for all conclusions drawn from the data lies entirely with the authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量 28 个欧洲国家的周期生育率教育梯度:基于特定奇数生育率估算的新方法
按女性教育水平划分的生育率目前只适用于已达到生育年龄的人群。在本文中,我们对欧洲生育率的教育梯度进行了更及时的测量。为了测量整个欧洲国家按教育程度划分的生育率,我们利用了欧盟收入和生活条件调查(EU-SILC)的数据。我们采用半回顾的方法来观察目前处于育龄期的组群的特定生育行为,同时正确记录教育水平。通过贝叶斯统计,可以获得每个国家的年龄、教育程度和奇偶数特定出生概率的可信区间。然后将这些出生概率合并到一个多国生命表中,以获得按教育程度划分的特定奇数和总出生率。出生概率的后分层使我们与各国的生育率估计值保持一致。我们揭示了在每个欧洲国家内部,不同教育程度的群体在生育率方面是否存在显著差异,这些差异在欧洲国家之间有多大差别,以及在整个欧洲,教育程度较高或较低的群体在生育行为上的异质性是否更大。我们还显示了教育群体间的异质性在哪种平价中最大。本研究基于欧盟统计局(Eurostat)的数据,即欧盟收入和生活条件统计[2011、2012、2013]。从数据中得出的所有结论完全由作者负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Demographic Research
Demographic Research DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Demographic Research is a free, online, open access, peer-reviewed journal of the population sciences published by the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock, Germany. The journal pioneers an expedited review system. Contributions can generally be published within one month after final acceptance.
期刊最新文献
How do environmental stressors influence migration? A meta-regression analysis of environmental migration literature Lives saved, lives lost, and under-reported COVID-19 deaths: Excess and non-excess mortality in relation to cause-specific mortality during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden Bayesian implementation of Rogers–Castro model migration schedules: An alternative technique for parameter estimation The formal demography of kinship V: Kin loss, bereavement, and causes of death Programmatic access to open statistical data for population studies: The SDMX standard
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1