MALPRAKTIK DOKTER DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG PRAKTIK KEDOKTERAN DAN HUKUM PERDATA

Aviyado Surya Adiartha, Arief Suryono
{"title":"MALPRAKTIK DOKTER DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG PRAKTIK KEDOKTERAN DAN HUKUM PERDATA","authors":"Aviyado Surya Adiartha, Arief Suryono","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i2.49189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to determine the legal consequences of medical malpractice by doctors against patients in the perspective of Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice and civil law. The research method used is a prescriptive normative legal research method. The legal approach used is the statutory approach. Sources of legal materials used include primary and secondary legal materials with legal material collection techniques using literature study or document study. The results of this study indicate that the Medical Practice Law only regulates disciplinary sanctions for doctors on the decision of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI) as a follow-up if there is a complaint from a patient against a doctor's actions that are considered detrimental, while the legal consequences must be borne by the doctor if proven to have committed medical malpractice it is not directly regulated by this law but is regulated by the Civil Code. The legal consequences of this medical malpractice cause the doctor's responsibility to the patient. This responsibility is in the form of liability for losses due to default or liability for losses due to illegal acts.","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"46 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Privat Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i2.49189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to determine the legal consequences of medical malpractice by doctors against patients in the perspective of Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice and civil law. The research method used is a prescriptive normative legal research method. The legal approach used is the statutory approach. Sources of legal materials used include primary and secondary legal materials with legal material collection techniques using literature study or document study. The results of this study indicate that the Medical Practice Law only regulates disciplinary sanctions for doctors on the decision of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI) as a follow-up if there is a complaint from a patient against a doctor's actions that are considered detrimental, while the legal consequences must be borne by the doctor if proven to have committed medical malpractice it is not directly regulated by this law but is regulated by the Civil Code. The legal consequences of this medical malpractice cause the doctor's responsibility to the patient. This responsibility is in the form of liability for losses due to default or liability for losses due to illegal acts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从医疗执业法和民法的角度看医生渎职问题
本文旨在从 2004 年第 29 号《医疗实践法》和民法的角度确定医生对患者实施医疗事故的法律后果。采用的研究方法是规范性法律研究方法。使用的法律方法是法定方法。所使用的法律材料来源包括第一手和第二手法律材料,并使用文献研究或文件研究等法律材料收集技术。研究结果表明,《医疗实践法》只规定了对医生的纪律处分,如果患者投诉医生的行为被认为是有害的,则由印尼医疗纪律荣誉委员会(MKDKI)作出决定,作为后续行动。这种医疗事故的法律后果导致了医生对患者的责任。这种责任的形式是对违约造成的损失承担责任或对非法行为造成的损失承担责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IMPLIKASI DAN MEKANISME EKSEKUSI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO.18/PUU-XVII/2019 DALAM HAL DEBITUR WANPRESTASI URGENSI PENGATURAN JAMINAN KREDIT DALAM SEKTOR PEER TO PEER (P2P) LENDING DI INDONESIA TANGGUNG JAWAB PERDATA PARA PIHAK DALAM PERDAGANGAN MELALUI SISTEM ELEKTRONIK PADA STARTUP MULTINASIONAL LAZADA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA PENERAPAN PRINSIP KYC PADA FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY P2P LENDING YANG AKOMODATIF BAGI PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM LENDER DALAM TRANSAKSI PEER TO PEER LENDING KAITANNYA PLATFORM YANG MELAKUKAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1