Experience Quality Scale for Fitness Centers (EQSFC): Validity and Reliability Study

Ali Sevilmiş, Mehmet Doğan
{"title":"Experience Quality Scale for Fitness Centers (EQSFC): Validity and Reliability Study","authors":"Ali Sevilmiş, Mehmet Doğan","doi":"10.2478/pcssr-2024-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable tool for measuring the perceptions of quality of experience for fitness center members. The research was conducted with two different sample groups who are current members of fitness centers. A total of 317 (141 females, 176 males) fitness center members volunteered to participate in the explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis survey, and 250 (102 females, 148 males) fitness center members volunteered to participate in the criterion-dependent validity survey. For the validity and reliability studies for the scale, explanatory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, criterion-dependent validity, Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency, and composite reliability were used. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis conducted to indicate the structural validity of the scale, a five-factor scale with 17 items included in i) communication quality, ii) physical environment quality, iii) outcome quality, iv) access quality, and v) entertainment quality was identified, explaining 63% of the total variance. According to the analysis results for criterion-related validity, a statistically significant positive relationship was detected between communication quality (r=.422, p<.001), physical environment quality (r=.582, p<.001), outcome quality (r=.597, p<.001), access quality (r=.458, p<.001), entertainment quality (r=.697, p<.001) and satisfaction. The results indicate that the scale can be used as a valid and reliable tool to measure the quality of experience perceived by individuals concerning the fitness center where they are members. In addition, it is thought that this scale, which details the factors that influence the customer experience in fitness centers for the first time, will provide an important contribution to the literature.","PeriodicalId":506577,"journal":{"name":"Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research","volume":"206 ","pages":"70 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2024-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable tool for measuring the perceptions of quality of experience for fitness center members. The research was conducted with two different sample groups who are current members of fitness centers. A total of 317 (141 females, 176 males) fitness center members volunteered to participate in the explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis survey, and 250 (102 females, 148 males) fitness center members volunteered to participate in the criterion-dependent validity survey. For the validity and reliability studies for the scale, explanatory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, criterion-dependent validity, Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency, and composite reliability were used. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis conducted to indicate the structural validity of the scale, a five-factor scale with 17 items included in i) communication quality, ii) physical environment quality, iii) outcome quality, iv) access quality, and v) entertainment quality was identified, explaining 63% of the total variance. According to the analysis results for criterion-related validity, a statistically significant positive relationship was detected between communication quality (r=.422, p<.001), physical environment quality (r=.582, p<.001), outcome quality (r=.597, p<.001), access quality (r=.458, p<.001), entertainment quality (r=.697, p<.001) and satisfaction. The results indicate that the scale can be used as a valid and reliable tool to measure the quality of experience perceived by individuals concerning the fitness center where they are members. In addition, it is thought that this scale, which details the factors that influence the customer experience in fitness centers for the first time, will provide an important contribution to the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健身中心体验质量量表(EQSFC):有效性和可靠性研究
摘要 本研究旨在开发一种有效可靠的工具,用于测量健身中心会员对体验质量的感知。研究针对两个不同的样本组进行,他们都是健身中心的现有会员。共有 317 名健身中心会员(141 名女性,176 名男性)自愿参加了解释性和确认性因素分析调查,另有 250 名健身中心会员(102 名女性,148 名男性)自愿参加了标准依赖性效度调查。量表的效度和信度研究采用了解释性因素分析、确认性因素分析、标准依赖效度、Cronbach's alpha 内部一致性和综合信度。在对量表的结构效度进行探索性因素分析后,确定了一个包含 17 个项目的五因素量表,即 i) 沟通质量、ii) 物理环境质量、iii) 结果质量、iv) 获取质量和 v) 娱乐质量,解释了总方差的 63%。根据标准相关效度的分析结果,沟通质量(r=.422,p<.001)、物理环境质量(r=.582,p<.001)、结果质量(r=.597,p<.001)、获取质量(r=.458,p<.001)、娱乐质量(r=.697,p<.001)与满意度之间存在统计学意义上的显著正相关关系。结果表明,该量表可作为一种有效、可靠的工具,用于测量个人对其所在健身中心的体验质量。此外,该量表首次详细描述了影响客户在健身中心体验的因素,被认为将为相关文献做出重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Motivation Profiles, Perceived Motivational Climate, Coping Perceptions and Anxiety Among Elite Young Ice Hockey Players A Multisystem View at Teacher Training Colleges during the COVID-19 Pandemic Occupational Burnout and Psychological Resilience Levels Among Physiotherapists Professionalisation and Autonomy of the Occupational Therapist Profession in Poland Stamps Don’t Lie: Sports, Military, and National Identity Postage Stamps As a Mirror of Aggressive Soviet and Russian Propaganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1