Betel Quid Chewing and Alcohol Consumption Co- Variate with Detection of Epstein - Barr Virus (EBV) DNA in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Tissues: Preliminary Evidence from a Subset of an Unmatched Case-Control Study

{"title":"Betel Quid Chewing and Alcohol Consumption Co- Variate with Detection of Epstein - Barr Virus (EBV) DNA in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Tissues: Preliminary Evidence from a Subset of an Unmatched Case-Control Study","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/iimj.01.05.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There is a dearth of information on the detection of oncogenic EBV in oral squamous cell carcinoma tissues in the Sri Lankan context. This subset of an unmatched case-control study aims to detect EBV-DNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma tissues of a group of Sri Lankan male patients. Method: Subset was selected representing the vast majority of OSCC patients in Sri Lanka, from an unmatched case-control study. Incisional biopsies of cases and excisional biopsies of controls were collected and stored at -800 C. DNA was extracted from frozen specimens, and Real-Time PCR was performed to detect target DNA of this ubiquitous virus, in histologically confirmed 27 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) cases and clinically diagnosed 26 Fibroepithelial-Polyp (FEP) controls with better quality DNA. Socio-demographic and substance abuse data were collected from 29 cases and 25 controls by a pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire, and the data were entered and analyzed using the SPSS-21 Statistical Package. Results: Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to determine the significance of qualitative and quantitative data statistically. The overall EBV prevalence was 34/53 (64.2%). In OSCC cases the EBV positivity was higher 21(77.8%) than the FEP controls 13 (50.0%), and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.035). The cases were higher betel quid chewers (p = 0.003) and heavy alcohol consumers (p =0.001) than the control group. Conclusion: Betel quid chewing and alcohol consumption co-variate with the detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma tissues which warrants further investigations.","PeriodicalId":507453,"journal":{"name":"International Internal Medicine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/iimj.01.05.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is a dearth of information on the detection of oncogenic EBV in oral squamous cell carcinoma tissues in the Sri Lankan context. This subset of an unmatched case-control study aims to detect EBV-DNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma tissues of a group of Sri Lankan male patients. Method: Subset was selected representing the vast majority of OSCC patients in Sri Lanka, from an unmatched case-control study. Incisional biopsies of cases and excisional biopsies of controls were collected and stored at -800 C. DNA was extracted from frozen specimens, and Real-Time PCR was performed to detect target DNA of this ubiquitous virus, in histologically confirmed 27 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) cases and clinically diagnosed 26 Fibroepithelial-Polyp (FEP) controls with better quality DNA. Socio-demographic and substance abuse data were collected from 29 cases and 25 controls by a pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire, and the data were entered and analyzed using the SPSS-21 Statistical Package. Results: Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to determine the significance of qualitative and quantitative data statistically. The overall EBV prevalence was 34/53 (64.2%). In OSCC cases the EBV positivity was higher 21(77.8%) than the FEP controls 13 (50.0%), and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.035). The cases were higher betel quid chewers (p = 0.003) and heavy alcohol consumers (p =0.001) than the control group. Conclusion: Betel quid chewing and alcohol consumption co-variate with the detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma tissues which warrants further investigations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嚼槟榔和饮酒与口腔鳞状细胞癌组织中 Epstein - Barr 病毒 (EBV) DNA 的检测存在共同差异:来自非匹配病例对照研究子集的初步证据
导言:在斯里兰卡,有关在口腔鳞状细胞癌组织中检测致癌 EBV 的信息十分匮乏。本研究是一项非匹配病例对照研究的子研究,旨在检测一组斯里兰卡男性患者口腔鳞状细胞癌组织中的 EBV DNA。研究方法:从一项非匹配病例对照研究中选取代表斯里兰卡绝大多数口腔鳞状细胞癌患者的子集。从冷冻标本中提取DNA,并对组织学确诊的27例口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)病例和临床诊断的26例多发性纤维上皮细胞癌(FEP)对照病例进行Real-Time PCR,以检测这种无处不在的病毒的目标DNA。通过预先测试的访谈者发放的调查问卷,收集了 29 例病例和 25 例对照者的社会人口学和药物滥用数据,并使用 SPSS-21 统计软件包对数据进行了输入和分析。结果采用描述性和推论性统计方法对定性和定量数据进行统计分析。总的 EBV 感染率为 34/53(64.2%)。在 OSCC 病例中,21 例(77.8%)的 EBV 阳性率高于 13 例(50.0%)的 FEP 对照组,这一差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.035)。与对照组相比,病例中咀嚼槟榔者(p = 0.003)和酗酒者(p = 0.001)更多。结论咀嚼槟榔和饮酒与口腔鳞状细胞癌组织中检测到 Epstein-Barr 病毒 (EBV) DNA 有共同作用,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simultaneous Estimation and Stability Indicating Method of Vildagliptin And Dapagliflozin by RP-HPLC in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form Urinalysis Results And Resistance To Hospital Treatment With Injectable Antimalarials In Angola Betel Quid Chewing and Alcohol Consumption Co- Variate with Detection of Epstein - Barr Virus (EBV) DNA in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Tissues: Preliminary Evidence from a Subset of an Unmatched Case-Control Study IoT Integration in Telemedicine: Investigating the Role of Internet of Things Devices in Facilitating Remote Patient Monitoring and Data Transmission Chromosomes and the Mitotic Cell Cycle Phase in Onion Roots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1