Experimental and Theoretical Shear Strength of Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Beam

Yahaya Watafua, Amana Ocholi, Mohammed Abdulmumin Nda
{"title":"Experimental and Theoretical Shear Strength of Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Beam","authors":"Yahaya Watafua, Amana Ocholi, Mohammed Abdulmumin Nda","doi":"10.36348/sjce.2023.v07i10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted to evaluate the experimental and theoretical shear strength of a simply supported reinforced concrete beam with and without shear reinforcement in accordance with Eurocode 2 design criteria. Fifteen (15) reinforced concrete beams of dimension 750mm x 150mm x 150mm reinforced with diameter 12mm size bars were cast at various reinforcement ratios (i.e. 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5%, and 3.0%), while preliminary and mechanical tests were conducted on the materials (i.e. cement, fine and coarse aggregate, and reinforcement bars) in accordance with relevant codes and standards. The outcome from the findings showed that the cement, fine aggregate and coarse aggregate used to cast the reinforced concrete beam were well graded and satisfies the requirement of code specification. More results showed that the average diameter of the reinforcement bars are 11.67mm, the mean tensile and ultimate strength of the reinforcement bars are 389.73N/mm2 and 640.80N/mm2 respectively, while the mean reinforcement steel elongation is 14.23% which mostly met code requirement indicating suitability of the reinforcement bars usage in concrete. Furthermore, the result from the findings showed that the Eurocode 2 (EC2) design criteria of beams without shear reinforcement were lower than the experimental value, while EC2 design criteria for beams with shear reinforcement was close to the experimental value.","PeriodicalId":437137,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjce.2023.v07i10.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the experimental and theoretical shear strength of a simply supported reinforced concrete beam with and without shear reinforcement in accordance with Eurocode 2 design criteria. Fifteen (15) reinforced concrete beams of dimension 750mm x 150mm x 150mm reinforced with diameter 12mm size bars were cast at various reinforcement ratios (i.e. 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5%, and 3.0%), while preliminary and mechanical tests were conducted on the materials (i.e. cement, fine and coarse aggregate, and reinforcement bars) in accordance with relevant codes and standards. The outcome from the findings showed that the cement, fine aggregate and coarse aggregate used to cast the reinforced concrete beam were well graded and satisfies the requirement of code specification. More results showed that the average diameter of the reinforcement bars are 11.67mm, the mean tensile and ultimate strength of the reinforcement bars are 389.73N/mm2 and 640.80N/mm2 respectively, while the mean reinforcement steel elongation is 14.23% which mostly met code requirement indicating suitability of the reinforcement bars usage in concrete. Furthermore, the result from the findings showed that the Eurocode 2 (EC2) design criteria of beams without shear reinforcement were lower than the experimental value, while EC2 design criteria for beams with shear reinforcement was close to the experimental value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简支钢筋混凝土梁的实验和理论抗剪强度
这项研究的目的是根据《欧洲规范 2》的设计标准,评估有剪力配筋和无剪力配筋的简支钢筋混凝土梁的实验和理论抗剪强度。按照不同的配筋率(即 1.0%、1.5%、2.0%、2.5% 和 3.0%)浇注了 15 根尺寸为 750mm x 150mm x 150mm 的钢筋混凝土梁,并根据相关规范和标准对材料(即水泥、细骨料、粗骨料和钢筋)进行了初步和机械测试。研究结果表明,浇注钢筋混凝土梁所用的水泥、细骨料和粗骨料级配良好,符合规范要求。更多结果显示,钢筋的平均直径为 11.67 毫米,钢筋的平均抗拉强度和极限强度分别为 389.73N/mm2 和 640.80N/mm2,而钢筋的平均伸长率为 14.23%,基本符合规范要求,这表明钢筋在混凝土中的使用是合适的。此外,研究结果表明,无抗剪钢筋梁的欧洲规范 2(EC2)设计标准低于实验值,而有抗剪钢筋梁的欧洲规范 2 设计标准接近实验值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laboratory Evaluation of the Hydraulic Conductivity as a Function of Changes in the Particle Size of a Cubitermes Sp Termite Mound Soil Treated with Lime Laboratory Evaluation of the Hydraulic Conductivity as a Function of Changes in the Particle Size of a Cubitermes Sp Termite Mound Soil Treated with Lime On-Grid Solar Traction System Experimental and Theoretical Shear Strength of Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Beam Relationship between the Intrinsic Properties of Sands and the Parameters of Mathematical Particle Size Distribution Models for Predicting Geotechnical Quantities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1