Breast Imaging Fellowship Virtual Interviews: The Program Director’s Perspective

Janine T Katzen, Jonathan Nguyen, Samantha Zuckerman, Lilian Wang, Gary Whitman, Victoria L. Mango
{"title":"Breast Imaging Fellowship Virtual Interviews: The Program Director’s Perspective","authors":"Janine T Katzen, Jonathan Nguyen, Samantha Zuckerman, Lilian Wang, Gary Whitman, Victoria L. Mango","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbad072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate breast imaging fellowship program directors’ perspectives on the virtual interview process. A 20-question survey constructed by members of the Fellowship Match Committee of the Society of Breast Imaging was distributed to all 99 breast imaging program directors registered with the Society. An initial e-mail with a link to the survey was distributed on September 9, 2022, and the survey was closed on October 1, 2022. Results were compiled and a descriptive statistical analysis was performed utilizing Microsoft Excel. There were 63 total responses (63/99, 64% response rate). There was a wide distribution in both the number of applications received and the number of interviews each program offered. Just under a fifth (12/63, 19%) of programs received 1 to 5 applications, whereas a quarter (16/63, 25%) received over 40 applications. In contrast, over a quarter (17/63, 27%) of programs interviewed 1 to 5 applicants, and only a small number (3/63, 5%) interviewed over 40 applicants. When reporting what worked best with the virtual interview process, the responses fell into the following 4 categories: efficiency, flexibility, virtual format, or other. When reporting what did not work well, the most common response (14/37, 38%) was conveying the atmosphere of the program in the virtual setting. This study provides an assessment of the virtual interview experience from the perspective of breast imaging fellowship programs, which may be useful in optimizing future interview experiences for programs and applicants.","PeriodicalId":502717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbad072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate breast imaging fellowship program directors’ perspectives on the virtual interview process. A 20-question survey constructed by members of the Fellowship Match Committee of the Society of Breast Imaging was distributed to all 99 breast imaging program directors registered with the Society. An initial e-mail with a link to the survey was distributed on September 9, 2022, and the survey was closed on October 1, 2022. Results were compiled and a descriptive statistical analysis was performed utilizing Microsoft Excel. There were 63 total responses (63/99, 64% response rate). There was a wide distribution in both the number of applications received and the number of interviews each program offered. Just under a fifth (12/63, 19%) of programs received 1 to 5 applications, whereas a quarter (16/63, 25%) received over 40 applications. In contrast, over a quarter (17/63, 27%) of programs interviewed 1 to 5 applicants, and only a small number (3/63, 5%) interviewed over 40 applicants. When reporting what worked best with the virtual interview process, the responses fell into the following 4 categories: efficiency, flexibility, virtual format, or other. When reporting what did not work well, the most common response (14/37, 38%) was conveying the atmosphere of the program in the virtual setting. This study provides an assessment of the virtual interview experience from the perspective of breast imaging fellowship programs, which may be useful in optimizing future interview experiences for programs and applicants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺成像研究员虚拟访谈:项目主任的视角
评估乳腺成像研究员项目主任对虚拟面试过程的看法。 乳房造影学会研究员匹配委员会成员设计了一份包含 20 个问题的调查问卷,并分发给在学会注册的所有 99 位乳房造影项目主任。2022 年 9 月 9 日发出了带有调查链接的初始电子邮件,调查于 2022 年 10 月 1 日结束。我们对调查结果进行了汇总,并利用 Microsoft Excel 进行了描述性统计分析。 共收到 63 份回复(63/99,回复率为 64%)。每个项目收到的申请数量和提供的面试次数分布广泛。只有不到五分之一(12/63,19%)的计划收到 1-5 份申请,而四分之一(16/63,25%)的计划收到 40 多份申请。相比之下,超过四分之一(17/63,27%)的项目面试了 1-5 名申请人,只有少数项目(3/63,5%)面试了 40 多名申请人。在报告虚拟面试过程的最佳效果时,回答分为以下四类:效率、灵活性、虚拟形式或其他。在报告哪些方面做得不好时,最常见的回答(14/37,38%)是在虚拟环境中传达项目的氛围。 本研究从乳腺成像奖学金项目的角度对虚拟面试体验进行了评估,这可能有助于优化项目和申请人未来的面试体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collagenous Spherulosis Presenting as Architectural Distortion on Mammography The Impact of Virtual Reality on Anxiety and Pain During US-Guided Breast Biopsies: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Breast Imaging Fellowship Virtual Interviews: The Program Director’s Perspective Intraductal Biopsy Clip Migration After Lactation Accessory Breast Tissue Presenting as Postpartum Axillary Galactorrhea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1