The Effect of Maximum Residue Limits on Agri-Food Trade: Evidence from Chinese Exports to the EU

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY German Journal of Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.30430/gjae.2023.0328
Dongpo Jiang, Xia Li, Ruiqiang Sun, Qi Li
{"title":"The Effect of Maximum Residue Limits on Agri-Food Trade: Evidence from Chinese Exports to the EU","authors":"Dongpo Jiang, Xia Li, Ruiqiang Sun, Qi Li","doi":"10.30430/gjae.2023.0328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is debate about whether maximum residue limits (MRLs) for pesticides act as a catalyst or barrier to trade. By constructing a trade model based on heterogeneous firm quality and productivity, we show that MRLs’ net effects on total export value, the number of exporting firms, and the average export value per firm depend on the interplay between the effect on import demand and that on variable and fixed compliance costs. We employ firm-level transaction data for agri-food products exported from China to the European Union (EU). We use heterogeneity indices that combine the number and level of MRLs to measure MRL stringency between China and the EU; a Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood estimator with fixed effects is used for estimation. We find that stricter MRLs, whether imposed by China or the EU, promote China’s agri-food exports to the EU. However, such promotion effects are heterogeneous across agri-food-exporting firms. In China, updates to MRL standards improve agri-food-exporting firms’ ability to comply with stricter MRLs. Public investment and services help reduce compliance costs. Our findings provide new evidence that MRLs are not new non-tariff measures adopted to replace reduced import tariffs.","PeriodicalId":48919,"journal":{"name":"German Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30430/gjae.2023.0328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is debate about whether maximum residue limits (MRLs) for pesticides act as a catalyst or barrier to trade. By constructing a trade model based on heterogeneous firm quality and productivity, we show that MRLs’ net effects on total export value, the number of exporting firms, and the average export value per firm depend on the interplay between the effect on import demand and that on variable and fixed compliance costs. We employ firm-level transaction data for agri-food products exported from China to the European Union (EU). We use heterogeneity indices that combine the number and level of MRLs to measure MRL stringency between China and the EU; a Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood estimator with fixed effects is used for estimation. We find that stricter MRLs, whether imposed by China or the EU, promote China’s agri-food exports to the EU. However, such promotion effects are heterogeneous across agri-food-exporting firms. In China, updates to MRL standards improve agri-food-exporting firms’ ability to comply with stricter MRLs. Public investment and services help reduce compliance costs. Our findings provide new evidence that MRLs are not new non-tariff measures adopted to replace reduced import tariffs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最大残留限量对农业食品贸易的影响:中国对欧盟出口的证据
关于农药最高残留限量(MRL)是贸易的催化剂还是贸易壁垒的问题一直存在争议。通过构建一个基于异质性企业质量和生产率的贸易模型,我们表明,最高残留限量对出口总值、出口企业数量和每家企业平均出口值的净影响取决于对进口需求的影响与对可变和固定合规成本的影响之间的相互作用。我们采用了从中国出口到欧盟(EU)的农业食品的企业级交易数据。我们使用结合最高残留限量数量和水平的异质性指数来衡量中国和欧盟之间最高残留限量的严格程度;使用带有固定效应的泊松伪最大似然估计法进行估计。我们发现,无论是中国还是欧盟实施更严格的最高残留限量标准,都会促进中国对欧盟的农业食品出口。然而,这种促进作用在不同的农业食品出口企业之间存在差异。在中国,最高残留限量标准的更新提高了农业食品出口企业遵守更严格的最高残留限量标准的能力。公共投资和服务有助于降低合规成本。我们的研究结果提供了新的证据,证明最高残留限量标准并不是为取代降低进口关税而采取的新的非关税措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
German Journal of Agricultural Economics
German Journal of Agricultural Economics AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The GJAE publishes a broad range of theoretical, applied and policy-related articles. It aims for a balanced coverage of economic issues within agricultural and food production, demand and trade, rural development, and sustainable and efficient resource use as well as specific German or European issues. The GJAE also welcomes review articles.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Maximum Residue Limits on Agri-Food Trade: Evidence from Chinese Exports to the EU Use Cases of the Integrated Administration and Control System’s Plot-Level Data: Protocol and Pilot Analysis for a Systematic Mapping Review A Trans-Theoretical Model for Farmers’ perceived Usefulness of Digital Risk Management Tools – A Case Study from Germany Public Agricultural Extension, Pest and Disease Experience, and Adoption of Improved Wheat Varieties The National and Regional Impact of the EU Bioeconomy Strategies on the Agri-Food Sector: Insights from Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1