COVID-19 Vaccines and the Menstrual Cycle: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI:10.2174/011573398x264267231113080001
Naser Alhusban, Sondos Al-Najjar, Fatima Alkubaisi, Abdulla Alzibdeh, Kenan S-Yasin, Alhareth Alhusban
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccines and the Menstrual Cycle: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Naser Alhusban, Sondos Al-Najjar, Fatima Alkubaisi, Abdulla Alzibdeh, Kenan S-Yasin, Alhareth Alhusban","doi":"10.2174/011573398x264267231113080001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to explore the impact of various COVID-19 vaccines on the menstrual cycle of Jordanian women. We conducted a retrospective analysis of tracked menstrual changes using an anonymous questionnaire written in the local language. We received 732 responses, and after exclusions, 617 responses were analyzed. The questionnaire covered six sectors: demographics, medical history, COVID-19 infection and vaccination status, obstetric and gynecological history, menstrual cycle history, and specific questions about cycle length, flow, and any symptoms before and after each vaccine shot. Participants included Jordanian females who had received any type of COVID-19 vaccine. Among the participants analyzed, two-thirds were between the ages of 20-35, and the majority had a normal BMI (59.6%). Most participants were single, nulliparous, and had never used contraception methods (79.3%, 82.0%, and 93.8%, respectively). Only a small percentage had other risk factors influencing menstrual cycle changes, such as surgical procedures (10.5%) and specific medications (8.10%). Baseline menstrual information was recorded. Forty percent of participants experienced changes in menstrual duration, and approximately one-fifth reported heavier and more severe premenstrual syndrome (PMS) symptoms. Body mass index (BMI) was directly correlated with bleeding intensity after vaccination. Parity was weakly directly proportional to bleeding intensity after vaccination. However, BMI and parity did not significantly correlate with menstrual duration, menstrual cycle length, PMS symptoms, or cramps after vaccination. In a population of young, non-sexually active women with a normal BMI, most participants did not experience significant changes in their menstrual cycles after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Only one-fifth of participants reported shorter duration, heavier bleeding, more frequent, more painful, and more severe PMS symptoms post-vaccination.","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573398x264267231113080001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the impact of various COVID-19 vaccines on the menstrual cycle of Jordanian women. We conducted a retrospective analysis of tracked menstrual changes using an anonymous questionnaire written in the local language. We received 732 responses, and after exclusions, 617 responses were analyzed. The questionnaire covered six sectors: demographics, medical history, COVID-19 infection and vaccination status, obstetric and gynecological history, menstrual cycle history, and specific questions about cycle length, flow, and any symptoms before and after each vaccine shot. Participants included Jordanian females who had received any type of COVID-19 vaccine. Among the participants analyzed, two-thirds were between the ages of 20-35, and the majority had a normal BMI (59.6%). Most participants were single, nulliparous, and had never used contraception methods (79.3%, 82.0%, and 93.8%, respectively). Only a small percentage had other risk factors influencing menstrual cycle changes, such as surgical procedures (10.5%) and specific medications (8.10%). Baseline menstrual information was recorded. Forty percent of participants experienced changes in menstrual duration, and approximately one-fifth reported heavier and more severe premenstrual syndrome (PMS) symptoms. Body mass index (BMI) was directly correlated with bleeding intensity after vaccination. Parity was weakly directly proportional to bleeding intensity after vaccination. However, BMI and parity did not significantly correlate with menstrual duration, menstrual cycle length, PMS symptoms, or cramps after vaccination. In a population of young, non-sexually active women with a normal BMI, most participants did not experience significant changes in their menstrual cycles after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Only one-fifth of participants reported shorter duration, heavier bleeding, more frequent, more painful, and more severe PMS symptoms post-vaccination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 疫苗与月经周期:一项横断面研究
本研究旨在探讨各种 COVID-19 疫苗对约旦妇女月经周期的影响。 我们使用用当地语言编写的匿名问卷对月经变化进行了回顾性分析。我们共收到 732 份回复,排除干扰后分析了 617 份回复。问卷涉及六个方面:人口统计学、病史、COVID-19 感染和疫苗接种情况、妇产科病史、月经周期史,以及有关周期长度、月经量和每次接种疫苗前后的任何症状的具体问题。参与者包括接种过任何类型 COVID-19 疫苗的约旦女性。 在分析的参与者中,三分之二的人年龄在 20-35 岁之间,大多数人的体重指数正常(59.6%)。大多数参与者为单身、无子宫,从未使用过避孕方法(分别为 79.3%、82.0% 和 93.8%)。只有一小部分人存在影响月经周期变化的其他风险因素,如手术(10.5%)和特殊药物(8.10%)。对基线月经信息进行了记录。40%的参与者的月经持续时间发生了变化,约五分之一的参与者表示经前综合征(PMS)症状更重、更严重。体重指数(BMI)与接种疫苗后的出血强度直接相关。胎次与接种后的出血强度呈弱正比。然而,体重指数和胎次与接种疫苗后的月经持续时间、月经周期长度、经前综合征症状或痉挛没有明显的相关性。 在体重指数正常、无性生活的年轻女性群体中,大多数参与者在接种 COVID-19 疫苗后月经周期没有发生明显变化。只有五分之一的参与者表示接种疫苗后月经持续时间更短、出血量更大、更频繁、更痛、更严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on respiratory diseases and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Lung Function and Quality of Life in COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Study Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Group 1 (Part A): Overview, Classification, Clinical Subsets, and Workup Deteriorating Pulmonary Functions in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis- A Pilot Study From South India COVID-19 Vaccines and the Menstrual Cycle: A Cross-Sectional Study NAT2 Gene Variants as a Provocative Factor for the Severe Course of COVID-19 Pneumonia in Ukrainian Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1