A comparative study of the efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulphate and intravenous dexmedetomidine in attenuating haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

Anju Mohan, Gautam Saha
{"title":"A comparative study of the efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulphate and intravenous dexmedetomidine in attenuating haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation","authors":"Anju Mohan, Gautam Saha","doi":"10.18231/j.ijca.2023.074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation elicit a sympathetic and parasympathetic response, which varies depending on the depth of anaesthesia, duration of laryngoscopy, and patient characteristics. Although different methods have been used to suppress the response, an ideal agent has yet to be discovered. This study compares and contrasts the effectiveness of intravenous dexmedetomidine and intravenous magnesium sulphate in reducing hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.: This 18-month prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative research was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Bokaro General Hospital, Bokaro Steel City, Jharkhand. One hundred twenty consenting study participants were randomly divided into three groups of forty. Before induction, Group A received IV normal saline as a placebo. Group B received 1 mcg/kg IV dexmedetomidine before induction, while Group C received 30 mg/kg IV 50% magnesium sulphate before induction.: Gender distribution was consistent and equal among 120 patients. Gender, age, weight, ASA, and type of surgery did not differ significantly across groups. The three groups had no statistically significant difference in baseline hemodynamic parameters. When compared to the Control Group (A), there were statistically significant changes in hemodynamic parameters in the Dexmedetomidine (B) and Magnesium sulphate (C) groups. There was no hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, dry mouth, or arrhythmias.: Dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate efficiently reduced the hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation, although dexmedetomidine attenuated the sympathetic response more effectively.","PeriodicalId":13310,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2023.074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation elicit a sympathetic and parasympathetic response, which varies depending on the depth of anaesthesia, duration of laryngoscopy, and patient characteristics. Although different methods have been used to suppress the response, an ideal agent has yet to be discovered. This study compares and contrasts the effectiveness of intravenous dexmedetomidine and intravenous magnesium sulphate in reducing hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.: This 18-month prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative research was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Bokaro General Hospital, Bokaro Steel City, Jharkhand. One hundred twenty consenting study participants were randomly divided into three groups of forty. Before induction, Group A received IV normal saline as a placebo. Group B received 1 mcg/kg IV dexmedetomidine before induction, while Group C received 30 mg/kg IV 50% magnesium sulphate before induction.: Gender distribution was consistent and equal among 120 patients. Gender, age, weight, ASA, and type of surgery did not differ significantly across groups. The three groups had no statistically significant difference in baseline hemodynamic parameters. When compared to the Control Group (A), there were statistically significant changes in hemodynamic parameters in the Dexmedetomidine (B) and Magnesium sulphate (C) groups. There was no hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, dry mouth, or arrhythmias.: Dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate efficiently reduced the hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation, although dexmedetomidine attenuated the sympathetic response more effectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射硫酸镁和静脉注射右美托咪定对减轻喉镜检查和气管插管时血流动力学反应的功效比较研究
喉镜检查和气管插管都会引起交感神经和副交感神经反应,这种反应因麻醉深度、喉镜检查持续时间和患者特征而异。虽然已有不同的方法用于抑制这种反应,但仍未找到理想的药剂。本研究比较并对比了静脉注射右美托咪定和静脉注射硫酸镁在喉镜检查和气管插管过程中降低血流动力学反应的效果:这项为期 18 个月的前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照比较研究在贾坎德邦博卡罗钢城博卡罗综合医院麻醉学和重症监护部进行。经过同意的 120 名研究参与者被随机分为三组,每组 40 人。诱导前,A 组静脉注射生理盐水作为安慰剂。B 组在诱导前静脉注射 1 毫克/千克右美托咪定,C 组在诱导前静脉注射 30 毫克/千克 50%硫酸镁:120 名患者的性别分布一致且相等。各组的性别、年龄、体重、ASA 和手术类型无明显差异。三组患者的基线血流动力学参数无明显统计学差异。与对照组(A)相比,右美托咪定组(B)和硫酸镁组(C)的血液动力学参数在统计学上有显著变化。没有出现低血压、心动过缓、恶心、呕吐、口干或心律失常:右美托咪定和硫酸镁能有效减轻喉镜检查和插管时的血流动力学应激反应,但右美托咪定能更有效地减轻交感神经反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparative study between curb-65 and psi/port score as predictors for ICU admission and mortality in community acquired pneumonia patients presenting to a tertiary care hospital An audit on the amount of drug wastage and the cost related to the disposal of unused intravenous agents in the operating theatres in a tertiary care hospital Oxygen generation and delivery: Start to end Anterior mediastinal masses: A single centre-based retrospective study Comparative study of tramadol and nalbuphine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular block: A cross sectional observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1