Comparative study of tramadol and nalbuphine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular block: A cross sectional observational study

N. Kamble, M. Gajbhare, Pranjal Rajendra Pimparkar, M. Gaikwad
{"title":"Comparative study of tramadol and nalbuphine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular block: A cross sectional observational study","authors":"N. Kamble, M. Gajbhare, Pranjal Rajendra Pimparkar, M. Gaikwad","doi":"10.18231/j.ijca.2024.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brachial plexus block via supraclavicular approach performed with the help of ultrasound assistance, is a promising anaesthetic alternative for upper limb surgery, when compared with general anaesthesia. It provides good surgical anaesthesia and better post-operative analgesia. We compared the anaesthetic and analgesic efficacy of two additives, nalbuphine and tramadol with 0.375% ropivacaine.A double-blind, cross-sectional study, performed prospectively on 82 patients who were randomly assigned into Group N (41) and Group T (41). Patients were posted for surgical procedure of upper limb under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Group N received inj. Ropivacaine 0.375% 25 ml plus 1ml (10 mg) of Nalbuphine plus 1ml of normal saline. Patients in Group T received inj. Ropivacaine 0.375% 25 ml with Inj. Tramadol 2 ml (100 mg). Total volume was 27 ml in both groups. Duration of postoperative analgesia was the primary outcome of our study. The secondary outcomes were the sensory and motor block characteristics (onset and duration), change in hemodynamic parameters and side effects.A statistically significant difference was noted in the duration of postoperative analgesia [Group N: 648.27 (± 124.69) minutes, Group T: 514.73 (± 43.15) minutes; P <0.001]. In terms of onset of both sensory and motor block no statistically significant difference was noted. A significant difference was noted in duration of sensory block (Group N: 545.85 ± 118.13 min; Group T: 416.71 ± 50.43 min; P <0.001). The mean duration of motor block was 482.93 ± 120.07 min in nalbuphine group and 356.59 ± 43.74 min in tramadol group; P <0.001.Nalbuphine 10mg is a better adjuvant to 0.375% ropivacaine when compared with tramadol 100 mg. It prolongs the duration of sensory block and motor block and increases the duration of analgesia postoperatively.","PeriodicalId":13310,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","volume":"3 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2024.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brachial plexus block via supraclavicular approach performed with the help of ultrasound assistance, is a promising anaesthetic alternative for upper limb surgery, when compared with general anaesthesia. It provides good surgical anaesthesia and better post-operative analgesia. We compared the anaesthetic and analgesic efficacy of two additives, nalbuphine and tramadol with 0.375% ropivacaine.A double-blind, cross-sectional study, performed prospectively on 82 patients who were randomly assigned into Group N (41) and Group T (41). Patients were posted for surgical procedure of upper limb under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Group N received inj. Ropivacaine 0.375% 25 ml plus 1ml (10 mg) of Nalbuphine plus 1ml of normal saline. Patients in Group T received inj. Ropivacaine 0.375% 25 ml with Inj. Tramadol 2 ml (100 mg). Total volume was 27 ml in both groups. Duration of postoperative analgesia was the primary outcome of our study. The secondary outcomes were the sensory and motor block characteristics (onset and duration), change in hemodynamic parameters and side effects.A statistically significant difference was noted in the duration of postoperative analgesia [Group N: 648.27 (± 124.69) minutes, Group T: 514.73 (± 43.15) minutes; P <0.001]. In terms of onset of both sensory and motor block no statistically significant difference was noted. A significant difference was noted in duration of sensory block (Group N: 545.85 ± 118.13 min; Group T: 416.71 ± 50.43 min; P <0.001). The mean duration of motor block was 482.93 ± 120.07 min in nalbuphine group and 356.59 ± 43.74 min in tramadol group; P <0.001.Nalbuphine 10mg is a better adjuvant to 0.375% ropivacaine when compared with tramadol 100 mg. It prolongs the duration of sensory block and motor block and increases the duration of analgesia postoperatively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锁骨上阻滞术中曲马多和纳布啡作为罗哌卡因辅助药物的比较研究:横断面观察研究
与全身麻醉相比,在超声波辅助下通过锁骨上方法进行臂丛神经阻滞是上肢手术中一种很有前景的麻醉替代方法。它能提供良好的手术麻醉和更好的术后镇痛。我们比较了纳布啡和曲马多这两种添加剂与 0.375% 罗哌卡因的麻醉和镇痛效果。这是一项双盲横断面前瞻性研究,82 名患者被随机分配到 N 组(41 人)和 T 组(41 人)。患者在锁骨上臂丛阻滞下进行上肢手术。N 组接受 0.3 毫克罗哌卡因注射。罗哌卡因 0.375% 25 毫升加 1 毫升(10 毫克)纳布啡加 1 毫升生理盐水。T 组患者接受 0.375% 罗哌卡因 25 毫升加 1 毫升(10 毫克)纳布啡加 1 毫升生理盐水注射。罗哌卡因 0.375% 25 毫升和曲马多注射液 2 毫升(10 毫克)。曲马多 2 毫升(100 毫克)。两组患者的总用量均为 27 毫升。术后镇痛持续时间是我们研究的主要结果。术后镇痛持续时间的差异具有统计学意义[N 组:648.27 (± 124.69) 分钟,T 组:514.73 (± 43.15) 分钟;P <0.001]。在感觉阻滞和运动阻滞的起始时间方面,没有统计学意义上的显著差异。感觉阻滞持续时间有明显差异(N 组:545.85 ± 118.13 分钟;T 组:416.71 ± 50.43 分钟;P <0.001)。与曲马多 100 毫克相比,纳布啡 10 毫克是 0.375% 罗哌卡因更好的辅助药物。与曲马多 100 毫克相比,纳布啡 10 毫克是 0.375% 罗哌卡因的更好辅助药物,它能延长感觉阻滞和运动阻滞的持续时间,并延长术后镇痛的持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparative study between curb-65 and psi/port score as predictors for ICU admission and mortality in community acquired pneumonia patients presenting to a tertiary care hospital An audit on the amount of drug wastage and the cost related to the disposal of unused intravenous agents in the operating theatres in a tertiary care hospital Oxygen generation and delivery: Start to end Anterior mediastinal masses: A single centre-based retrospective study Comparative study of tramadol and nalbuphine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular block: A cross sectional observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1