Securitizing Non-Traditional Security (NTS) Threats: China’s Track 2 Diplomacy in Southeast Asia

Q2 Arts and Humanities Asian International Studies Review Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI:10.1163/2667078x-bja10027
Aletheia Kerygma B. Valenciano
{"title":"Securitizing Non-Traditional Security (NTS) Threats: China’s Track 2 Diplomacy in Southeast Asia","authors":"Aletheia Kerygma B. Valenciano","doi":"10.1163/2667078x-bja10027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As China continues to strengthen its geopolitical status in Southeast Asia, it has expanded its foreign policy strategies to include track 2 diplomacy, which focuses on multilateral security dialogues and aims to support and strengthen official diplomacy. The existing literature on China’s track 2 diplomacy focuses on its effectiveness as a mechanism for conflict resolution, often overlooking the important question of how and why it became a foreign policy option for China. Using data drawn from key informant interviews, document analysis, and participant observation, this study examines specifically the role of non-traditional security (NTS) in the expansion of China’s track 2 diplomacy in Southeast Asia. From the lens of the securitization framework, this study argues that China’s track 2 diplomacy in Southeast Asia is, to a certain extent, a result of securitizing the NTS dimension of these issues. Moreover, while track 2 diplomacy functions as a mechanism to manage NTS threats, China has not completely abandoned its traditional security considerations. In fact, it views track 2 as instrumental in pursuing its wider political, security, and strategic goals. This study further explores the prospects and challenges for China’s track 2 diplomacy.","PeriodicalId":37023,"journal":{"name":"Asian International Studies Review","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian International Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2667078x-bja10027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As China continues to strengthen its geopolitical status in Southeast Asia, it has expanded its foreign policy strategies to include track 2 diplomacy, which focuses on multilateral security dialogues and aims to support and strengthen official diplomacy. The existing literature on China’s track 2 diplomacy focuses on its effectiveness as a mechanism for conflict resolution, often overlooking the important question of how and why it became a foreign policy option for China. Using data drawn from key informant interviews, document analysis, and participant observation, this study examines specifically the role of non-traditional security (NTS) in the expansion of China’s track 2 diplomacy in Southeast Asia. From the lens of the securitization framework, this study argues that China’s track 2 diplomacy in Southeast Asia is, to a certain extent, a result of securitizing the NTS dimension of these issues. Moreover, while track 2 diplomacy functions as a mechanism to manage NTS threats, China has not completely abandoned its traditional security considerations. In fact, it views track 2 as instrumental in pursuing its wider political, security, and strategic goals. This study further explores the prospects and challenges for China’s track 2 diplomacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非传统安全(NTS)威胁的安全化:中国在东南亚的二轨外交
随着中国不断加强其在东南亚的地缘政治地位,中国已将其外交政策战略扩展至第二轨道外交,第二轨道外交侧重于多边安全对话,旨在支持和加强官方外交。有关中国第二轨道外交的现有文献主要关注其作为冲突解决机制的有效性,而往往忽略了其如何以及为何成为中国外交政策选项这一重要问题。本研究利用关键信息提供者访谈、文件分析和参与观察所获得的数据,具体研究了非传统安全(NTS)在中国在东南亚扩展第二轨道外交中的作用。本研究从安全化框架的视角出发,认为中国在东南亚的第二轨道外交在一定程度上是将这些问题的非传统安全层面安全化的结果。此外,虽然第二轨道外交是一种管理 NTS 威胁的机制,但中国并未完全放弃传统的安全考虑。事实上,中国认为第二轨道有助于实现其更广泛的政治、安全和战略目标。本研究进一步探讨了中国第二轨道外交的前景和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian International Studies Review
Asian International Studies Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liberal Convergence or Differential Exclusion? Temporary Labor Migration Policy in Japan and Korea The Impacts of Community-Driven Development Program in Conflict-Affected Regions: Evidence from Cambodia Assessing the Political Clout of Thailand’s “Monarchized” Military in 2023 Whose Ideas Matter? The Changing Meaning of Health Protocols in Indonesia’s Border Management Policies in the Pandemic Era Securitizing Non-Traditional Security (NTS) Threats: China’s Track 2 Diplomacy in Southeast Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1