Prediction of POMA-G Score from Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters

Irfan Kösesoy
{"title":"Prediction of POMA-G Score from Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters","authors":"Irfan Kösesoy","doi":"10.24012/dumf.1326557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"POMA test, is a type of test used to evaluate an individual's ability to perform functional movements and activities and is commonly used in the field of rehabilitation and physical therapy to assess an individual's mobility and identify areas for improvement. POMA evaluation is typically conducted by experts who are trained in using this tool to assess mobility and balance in individuals. However, it is possible that the POMA score may vary depending on the expert who conducts the evaluation because different experts may have different approaches to evaluation, and an individual expert's evaluation may also vary over time. These differences in the evaluation may lead to variations in the POMA score and may impact its reliability. Gait analysis, on the other hand, is objective in nature, providing a more reliable way of assessing the mobility of individuals. This study aimed to predict the measurements obtained in the gait portion of the POMA test (POMA-G) based on objectively obtained spatiotemporal gait parameters. To do this, a dataset consisting of gait parameters from 44 older adults was used. The POMA-G scores were rated by two physiotherapists, one of whom was an expert and the other who was familiar with the test but less experienced. The study also included an analysis of the reliability of physiotherapists’ assessment and the proposed prediction models.","PeriodicalId":158576,"journal":{"name":"DÜMF Mühendislik Dergisi","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DÜMF Mühendislik Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.1326557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

POMA test, is a type of test used to evaluate an individual's ability to perform functional movements and activities and is commonly used in the field of rehabilitation and physical therapy to assess an individual's mobility and identify areas for improvement. POMA evaluation is typically conducted by experts who are trained in using this tool to assess mobility and balance in individuals. However, it is possible that the POMA score may vary depending on the expert who conducts the evaluation because different experts may have different approaches to evaluation, and an individual expert's evaluation may also vary over time. These differences in the evaluation may lead to variations in the POMA score and may impact its reliability. Gait analysis, on the other hand, is objective in nature, providing a more reliable way of assessing the mobility of individuals. This study aimed to predict the measurements obtained in the gait portion of the POMA test (POMA-G) based on objectively obtained spatiotemporal gait parameters. To do this, a dataset consisting of gait parameters from 44 older adults was used. The POMA-G scores were rated by two physiotherapists, one of whom was an expert and the other who was familiar with the test but less experienced. The study also included an analysis of the reliability of physiotherapists’ assessment and the proposed prediction models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据时空步态参数预测 POMA-G 评分
POMA测试是一种用于评估个人执行功能性动作和活动能力的测试,通常用于康复和物理治疗领域,以评估个人的活动能力并确定需要改进的方面。POMA评估通常由受过使用该工具评估个人活动能力和平衡能力培训的专家进行。但是,由于不同的专家可能会采用不同的评估方法,而且专家的评估结果也可能会随着时间的推移而发生变化,因此,POMA 的得分有可能会因进行评估的专家不同而有所差异。评估中的这些差异可能会导致 POMA 分数的变化,并可能影响其可靠性。另一方面,步态分析具有客观性,可为评估个人活动能力提供更可靠的方法。 本研究旨在根据客观获得的时空步态参数预测POMA测试(POMA-G)步态部分的测量结果。为此,我们使用了由 44 位老年人步态参数组成的数据集。POMA-G 评分由两名物理治疗师评定,其中一名是专家,另一名熟悉该测试但经验较少。研究还包括对物理治疗师的评估结果和建议的预测模型的可靠性进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Edge Boosted Global Awared Low-light Image Enhancement Network The Effect of Latent Space Vector on Generating Animal Faces in Deep Convolutional GAN: An Analysis Çift tabakalı çelik uzay kafes kubbe sistemlerinin yapısal performansının incelenmesi Boriding Effect on the Hardness of AISI 1020, AISI 1060, AISI 4140 Steels and Application of Artificial Neural Network for Prediction of Borided Layer Controlling the Mobile Robot with the Pure Pursuit Algorithm to Tracking the Reference Path Sent from the Android Device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1