Metacognition and diagrams in marking-for-self

Q1 Arts and Humanities Cognitive Semiotics Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1515/cogsem-2023-2008
Henrique T. D. Perissinotto, João Queiroz
{"title":"Metacognition and diagrams in marking-for-self","authors":"Henrique T. D. Perissinotto, João Queiroz","doi":"10.1515/cogsem-2023-2008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Metacognition relies on representations, which are commonly viewed as internal knowledge structures. We explore the idea that external embodied diagrams, rather than monomodal symbolic-based entities, can provide an accurate description of metacognition in choreographic dance. When marking, dancers use their bodies to represent properties, dynamics, or structures of dance phrases. Marking-for-self occurs when a dancer marks the dance in their own unique manner, potentially allowing for real-time reflection through the manipulation of external signs. These manipulations can be considered diagrammatic semiosis, as diagrams signify shared relational parts analogous to the parts of their objects. Based on Peirce’s semiotics, we argue that semiosis is crucial for metacognition. This paper is structured to first review marking and marking-for-self, followed by an overview of metacognition. We then define marking-for-self as a metacognitive phenomenon and introduce Peirce’s concept of semiosis and diagrams. Finally, we describe marking as a diagrammatic sign and explain how marking-for-self is an embodied metacognitive process achieved through the manipulation of diagrammatic structures.","PeriodicalId":52385,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semiotics","volume":"63 1","pages":"145 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Semiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2023-2008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Metacognition relies on representations, which are commonly viewed as internal knowledge structures. We explore the idea that external embodied diagrams, rather than monomodal symbolic-based entities, can provide an accurate description of metacognition in choreographic dance. When marking, dancers use their bodies to represent properties, dynamics, or structures of dance phrases. Marking-for-self occurs when a dancer marks the dance in their own unique manner, potentially allowing for real-time reflection through the manipulation of external signs. These manipulations can be considered diagrammatic semiosis, as diagrams signify shared relational parts analogous to the parts of their objects. Based on Peirce’s semiotics, we argue that semiosis is crucial for metacognition. This paper is structured to first review marking and marking-for-self, followed by an overview of metacognition. We then define marking-for-self as a metacognitive phenomenon and introduce Peirce’s concept of semiosis and diagrams. Finally, we describe marking as a diagrammatic sign and explain how marking-for-self is an embodied metacognitive process achieved through the manipulation of diagrammatic structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我批改中的元认知和图表
摘要 元认知依赖于表征,而表征通常被视为内部知识结构。我们探讨的观点是,外部体现的图表,而不是基于单模态符号的实体,能够准确描述舞蹈编排中的元认知。在标记时,舞者用他们的身体来表示舞蹈乐句的属性、动态或结构。当舞者以自己独特的方式标记舞蹈时,就出现了 "为自己标记 "的情况,这有可能通过对外部符号的操作进行实时反思。这些操作可被视为图解符号学,因为图解标志着与其对象部分类似的共享关系部分。基于皮尔斯的符号学,我们认为符号学对于元认知至关重要。本文首先回顾了标记和自我标记,然后概述了元认知。然后,我们将 "为自己做标记 "定义为一种元认知现象,并介绍了皮尔斯的符号学和图表概念。最后,我们将标记描述为一种图示符号,并解释了 "为自己标记 "是如何通过对图示结构的操作来实现的一种体现性元认知过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Semiotics
Cognitive Semiotics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Art, pictoriality and semiotics – a reflection on Göran Sonesson’s contribution to art theory Psychologism in the study of children’s semiotic development Apple-and-pin drawings by blind novices show occluded features: region theory The cultural semiotics of Jingshen and cognitive homeostasis Dialogue and the “miracle of language”: the early and late Bakhtin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1