Comparative Efficacy of Elsa and English Speaking Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Study on EFL Learning Outcomes

Arbain, Widi Syahtia Pane, Raodah Mifdtahul Jannah
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Elsa and English Speaking Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Study on EFL Learning Outcomes","authors":"Arbain, Widi Syahtia Pane, Raodah Mifdtahul Jannah","doi":"10.31605/eduvelop.v7i1.2974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an era where digital learning tools are reshaping the educational landscape, selecting the right language learning application becomes paramount, especially for institutions aiming to enhance their students' English proficiency. While numerous language applications exist, only a few are accessible without cost. This study zeroes in on two such free applications: ELSA and English Speaking Practice. The choice of these apps aimed to discern the instructional differences and their subsequent impact on learners. Conducted at SMK Negeri 17 Samarinda, the research involved two experimental classes: X Pharmacy 4 (33 students) and X Medical Laboratory Technology 1 (34 students). Using a Quasi-Experimental design, the study employed quantitative methods, including pre-test and post-test evaluations, to gauge the comparative effectiveness of the apps. The results were illuminating: the class utilizing ELSA witnessed a proficiency uptick of 15.21%, whereas the English Speaking Practice class observed a 13% increase. With a p-value of 0.000 <0.05, the data conclusively shows significant disparities in the efficacy of the two applications. This research underscores the importance of judiciously selecting digital tools in EFL contexts, ensuring optimal learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":436636,"journal":{"name":"Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v7i1.2974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an era where digital learning tools are reshaping the educational landscape, selecting the right language learning application becomes paramount, especially for institutions aiming to enhance their students' English proficiency. While numerous language applications exist, only a few are accessible without cost. This study zeroes in on two such free applications: ELSA and English Speaking Practice. The choice of these apps aimed to discern the instructional differences and their subsequent impact on learners. Conducted at SMK Negeri 17 Samarinda, the research involved two experimental classes: X Pharmacy 4 (33 students) and X Medical Laboratory Technology 1 (34 students). Using a Quasi-Experimental design, the study employed quantitative methods, including pre-test and post-test evaluations, to gauge the comparative effectiveness of the apps. The results were illuminating: the class utilizing ELSA witnessed a proficiency uptick of 15.21%, whereas the English Speaking Practice class observed a 13% increase. With a p-value of 0.000 <0.05, the data conclusively shows significant disparities in the efficacy of the two applications. This research underscores the importance of judiciously selecting digital tools in EFL contexts, ensuring optimal learning outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾尔莎与英语口语练习的功效比较:关于 EFL 学习成果的准实验研究
在数字化学习工具重塑教育格局的时代,选择合适的语言学习应用程序变得至关重要,尤其是对于旨在提高学生英语水平的机构而言。虽然语言应用程序数量众多,但只有少数可以免费使用。本研究将重点放在两个这样的免费应用程序上:ELSA 和英语口语练习。选择这两个应用程序的目的是为了辨别其教学差异及其对学习者的影响。这项研究在三马林达第十七中学(SMK Negeri 17)进行,涉及两个实验班:X药剂学4班(33名学生)和X医学实验技术1班(34名学生)。研究采用准实验设计,使用定量方法,包括前测和后测评估,来衡量应用程序的比较效果。结果很有启发性:使用 ELSA 的班级学生的英语能力提高了 15.21%,而英语口语练习班的学生则提高了 13%。P 值为 0.000 <0.05,数据确凿地表明了这两种应用软件在功效上的显著差异。这项研究强调了在 EFL 环境中明智选择数字工具的重要性,从而确保最佳的学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using “Listening Time Podcast” on Spotify to Improve Students’ Listening Comprehension Level Of Understanding of TBI Students Towards Plagiarism at Stain Majene Implementing Flipped Classroom Model Integrated with Interactive Multimedia To Enhance Students’ Writing Ability at English Tadris Program of UIN Datokarama Palu Teaching English for Management Students. Does Technology Essential? Comparative Efficacy of Elsa and English Speaking Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Study on EFL Learning Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1