Visual and Auditory Temporal Processing in Elementary School Children

IF 0.5 Q3 LINGUISTICS Psycholinguistics Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.31470/2309-1797-2023-34-1-85-110
Claudia Vásquez, Mercedes Muñetón-Ayala
{"title":"Visual and Auditory Temporal Processing in Elementary School Children","authors":"Claudia Vásquez, Mercedes Muñetón-Ayala","doi":"10.31470/2309-1797-2023-34-1-85-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. Temporal processing shows an evolutionary character in accordance with age and schooling. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of temporal processing in children in different grades in primary school. Methods. 470 children (aged 5–13), in five school grades, were compared to a Temporal Order Judgment. Similar visual and auditory, linguistic, and nonlinguistic stimuli were presented to them. A three-factor repeated measure multivariate analysis of variance was used to examine the effects of Grade (1°vs.2°vs.3°vs.4°vs.5°) x Stimulus (Linguistic vs. Nonlinguistic) x Modality (Visual vs. Auditory). Results. These three factors have significant interactions. Auditory-nonlinguistic tasks were easier than auditory-linguistic tasks in every grade. Visual-nonlinguistic tasks were easier than visual-linguistic tasks in higher grades, and 1st grade differed significantly from the other school grades in all cases. The higher the school grade, the better the performance of TOJ tasks. Visual-linguistic tasks were easier than auditory-linguistic tasks. Conclusions. The present study provides evidence concerning the progressive nature of temporal processing among primary school children. This development trajectory is particularly noteworthy for students in lower primary school grades. Furthermore, the Temporal Order Judgment (TOJ) task exhibited robust experimental support, rendering it a valuable tool for assessing temporal processing within conventional school populations. This task offers the potential to assess TP across auditory and / or visual modalities, with diverse types of stimuli (linguistic vs. non-linguistic). Finally, the auditory modality, and especially the auditory linguistic modality, showed greater sensitivity depending on the school grade.","PeriodicalId":42961,"journal":{"name":"Psycholinguistics","volume":"2017 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2023-34-1-85-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. Temporal processing shows an evolutionary character in accordance with age and schooling. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of temporal processing in children in different grades in primary school. Methods. 470 children (aged 5–13), in five school grades, were compared to a Temporal Order Judgment. Similar visual and auditory, linguistic, and nonlinguistic stimuli were presented to them. A three-factor repeated measure multivariate analysis of variance was used to examine the effects of Grade (1°vs.2°vs.3°vs.4°vs.5°) x Stimulus (Linguistic vs. Nonlinguistic) x Modality (Visual vs. Auditory). Results. These three factors have significant interactions. Auditory-nonlinguistic tasks were easier than auditory-linguistic tasks in every grade. Visual-nonlinguistic tasks were easier than visual-linguistic tasks in higher grades, and 1st grade differed significantly from the other school grades in all cases. The higher the school grade, the better the performance of TOJ tasks. Visual-linguistic tasks were easier than auditory-linguistic tasks. Conclusions. The present study provides evidence concerning the progressive nature of temporal processing among primary school children. This development trajectory is particularly noteworthy for students in lower primary school grades. Furthermore, the Temporal Order Judgment (TOJ) task exhibited robust experimental support, rendering it a valuable tool for assessing temporal processing within conventional school populations. This task offers the potential to assess TP across auditory and / or visual modalities, with diverse types of stimuli (linguistic vs. non-linguistic). Finally, the auditory modality, and especially the auditory linguistic modality, showed greater sensitivity depending on the school grade.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学生的视觉和听觉时间处理能力
目的时间处理呈现出与年龄和学校教育相适应的进化特征。本研究旨在分析时间加工在小学不同年级儿童中的作用。 研究方法对五个年级的 470 名儿童(5-13 岁)进行时序判断比较。向他们展示了类似的视觉和听觉、语言和非语言刺激。采用三因素重复测量多变量方差分析来研究年级(1°vs.2°vs.3°vs.4°vs.5°)x刺激(语言性与非语言性)x模态(视觉与听觉)的影响。 结果。这三个因素具有明显的交互作用。在每个年级,听觉-非语言任务都比听觉-语言任务简单。在较高年级,视觉-非语言任务比视觉-语言任务容易,而一年级与其他年级在所有情况下都有显著差异。年级越高,TOJ 任务的成绩越好。视觉语言任务比听觉语言任务容易。 结论本研究为小学生时间处理能力的渐进性提供了证据。这种发展轨迹在小学低年级学生中尤为明显。此外,时序判断(TOJ)任务显示出强大的实验支持,使其成为评估传统学龄儿童时序处理能力的重要工具。这项任务为评估听觉和/或视觉模式下的时序判断提供了可能性,同时还提供了不同类型的刺激(语言刺激与非语言刺激)。最后,听觉模态,尤其是听觉语言模态,在不同的学校年级表现出更高的灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psycholinguistics
Psycholinguistics LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the Source-Text Syntactic Characteristics on the Sight-Translation Strategies and Quality Метод незакінчених речень в міждисциплінарному дослідженні соціально-демографічних та лінгвокультурних особливостей засуджених за колабораційну діяльність Information and Psychological Security of the Media Space. Ukrainian Experience of Implementation of Psycholinguistic Component Into Media Education The Use of Jordanian Arabic Possessive Pronouns by Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder The Impact of Music on Verbal Memory: Evidence from Jordanian University Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1