Correlation between the source of Law and the form of Law concepts: theoretical and conceptual aspect

Yurii Kyrychenko, Volodymyr Orlianskyi, Viktor Kyrychenko, Natalia Riezanova, Julia Sokolenko
{"title":"Correlation between the source of Law and the form of Law concepts: theoretical and conceptual aspect","authors":"Yurii Kyrychenko, Volodymyr Orlianskyi, Viktor Kyrychenko, Natalia Riezanova, Julia Sokolenko","doi":"10.24862/rcdu.v14i2.1776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the research is to view the main approaches to understanding the source of law category. Main content. On the basis of available scientific works by domestic and foreign scientists, the essence and content of the “source of law” was revealed, an analysis of the relationship between “source of law” and “form of law” concepts was carried out, and differences between them were substantiated. Methodology:  The methodological basis of the research is presented as comparative-legal and systematic analysis, formal-legal method, interpretation method, hermeneutic method as well as methods of analysis and synthesis. Conclusions. Summarizing what has been said, we can come to the conclusion that such concepts as “source of law” and “form of law” cannot be considered identical. Form of law is expedient to be defined as the method of law objectification that is, as external design of the content of law, the so-called external manifestation of the legal content. At the same time, source of law is appropriate to be considered as origins of law, that is, those conditions and circumstances in which meanings of law are formed, law as such is created from. Key words: source of law, form of law, content, internal and external forms of law, correlation.","PeriodicalId":53730,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Curso de Direito do UNIFOR","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Curso de Direito do UNIFOR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24862/rcdu.v14i2.1776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to view the main approaches to understanding the source of law category. Main content. On the basis of available scientific works by domestic and foreign scientists, the essence and content of the “source of law” was revealed, an analysis of the relationship between “source of law” and “form of law” concepts was carried out, and differences between them were substantiated. Methodology:  The methodological basis of the research is presented as comparative-legal and systematic analysis, formal-legal method, interpretation method, hermeneutic method as well as methods of analysis and synthesis. Conclusions. Summarizing what has been said, we can come to the conclusion that such concepts as “source of law” and “form of law” cannot be considered identical. Form of law is expedient to be defined as the method of law objectification that is, as external design of the content of law, the so-called external manifestation of the legal content. At the same time, source of law is appropriate to be considered as origins of law, that is, those conditions and circumstances in which meanings of law are formed, law as such is created from. Key words: source of law, form of law, content, internal and external forms of law, correlation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律渊源与法律概念形式之间的关系:理论和概念方面
研究的目的是查看了解法律类别来源的主要方法。主要内容。在国内外现有科学著作的基础上,揭示 "法的渊源 "的本质和内涵,分析 "法的渊源 "与 "法的形式 "概念之间的关系,论证二者之间的差异。研究方法: 研究的方法论基础包括比较法和系统分析、形式法学方法、解释学方法、诠释学方法以及分析和综合方法。结论。综上所述,我们可以得出这样的结论,即 "法律渊源 "和 "法律形式 "这两个概念不能被认为是相同的。法律形式 "宜被定义为法律对象化的方法,即法律内容的外部设计,也就是所谓的法律内容的外部表现形式。同时,法律渊源宜被视为法律的起源,即法律意义形成的条件和环境,法律本身就是从这些条件和环境中产生的。 关键词:法律渊源、法律形式、内容、法律的内部和外部形式、相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Resenha de "Polícia Judiciária Militar e seus procedimentos pré-processuais" Book Review Political political theory: essays on Institutions O discurso manipulatório das Plataformas Digitais e os efeitos objetivos e subjetivos na relação de emprego Punitivismo dos atos infracionais de tráfico de drogas na jurisprudência do Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande de Sul e o seu descompasso com a Súmula 492 do STJ Breve estudo sobre a seletividade de mulheres pretas no crime de tráfico de drogas no Brasil à luz da necropolítica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1