A comparison between 2% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination: brand name drug to its generic counterpart regarding efficacy and side effects

Nada M.Y. El Adawy, Yasser S. Mohamed, Noha M. Khalil, Yasmine M. Elsayed, Mohamed B. Kenawy
{"title":"A comparison between 2% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination: brand name drug to its generic counterpart regarding efficacy and side effects","authors":"Nada M.Y. El Adawy, Yasser S. Mohamed, Noha M. Khalil, Yasmine M. Elsayed, Mohamed B. Kenawy","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_33_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare 2% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination brand name drug (Cosopt) to its generic counterpart (Twinzol) regarding efficacy and side effects. The study included 92 eyes of 92 patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma and are indicated for antiglaucoma fixed combination of 20 mg/ml dorzolamide/5 mg/ml timolol). Patients were randomly divided into two groups: the first group received Cosopt, whereas the second received Twinzol. In visit, intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured and any local side effects by either eye drops was recorded. Monitoring and recording the percentage of IOP drop each month and all over the 3 months duration of follow up visits were done. The percentage of IOP drop for Cosopt and Twinzol after 1 month showed a significant P value of 0.032, with a mean percent reduction in IOP of 28.55%, median percent reduction of 26.92%, the minimum is 3.82% while the maximum is 62.96% for the Cosopt group, while that for Twinzol was 23.14, 21.29, 4.17, and 57.14%, respectively. On the other hand, the percentage of drop of IOP between the two groups after 3 months showed insignificant P value (0.646). IOP measurement was statistically insignificant between the two groups at 1 (0.462) and 3 months (0.639). As regards side effects; both eye drops were comparable with an insignificant P value of 0.49. The study demonstrated a reliable efficacy and safety on using generic therapy Twinzol compared with band counterpart Cosopt.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_33_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare 2% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination brand name drug (Cosopt) to its generic counterpart (Twinzol) regarding efficacy and side effects. The study included 92 eyes of 92 patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma and are indicated for antiglaucoma fixed combination of 20 mg/ml dorzolamide/5 mg/ml timolol). Patients were randomly divided into two groups: the first group received Cosopt, whereas the second received Twinzol. In visit, intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured and any local side effects by either eye drops was recorded. Monitoring and recording the percentage of IOP drop each month and all over the 3 months duration of follow up visits were done. The percentage of IOP drop for Cosopt and Twinzol after 1 month showed a significant P value of 0.032, with a mean percent reduction in IOP of 28.55%, median percent reduction of 26.92%, the minimum is 3.82% while the maximum is 62.96% for the Cosopt group, while that for Twinzol was 23.14, 21.29, 4.17, and 57.14%, respectively. On the other hand, the percentage of drop of IOP between the two groups after 3 months showed insignificant P value (0.646). IOP measurement was statistically insignificant between the two groups at 1 (0.462) and 3 months (0.639). As regards side effects; both eye drops were comparable with an insignificant P value of 0.49. The study demonstrated a reliable efficacy and safety on using generic therapy Twinzol compared with band counterpart Cosopt.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2% 多佐胺/0.5%噻吗洛尔固定组合:品牌药与普通药在疗效和副作用方面的比较
本研究的目的是比较 2% 多佐胺/0.5% 噻吗洛尔固定组合品牌药(Cosopt)与普通药(Twinzol)的疗效和副作用。 该研究包括 92 名被诊断为原发性开角型青光眼的患者的 92 只眼睛,这些患者适用于 20 毫克/毫升多佐胺/5 毫克/毫升噻吗洛尔的抗青光眼固定组合药物。)患者被随机分为两组:第一组接受 Cosopt,第二组接受 Twinzol。在就诊时,测量眼压并记录任何一种眼药水的局部副作用。在 3 个月的随访期间,每月监测并记录眼压下降的百分比。 一个月后,Cosopt 和 Twinzol 的眼压下降百分比显示出显著的 P 值 0.032,Cosopt 组的平均眼压下降百分比为 28.55%,中位数为 26.92%,最小值为 3.82%,最大值为 62.96%,而 Twinzol 组的平均眼压下降百分比分别为 23.14%、21.29%、4.17% 和 57.14%。另一方面,两组患者 3 个月后的眼压下降百分比的 P 值(0.646)不显著。两组在 1 个月(0.462)和 3 个月(0.639)时的眼压测量结果在统计学上差异不显著。在副作用方面,两种眼药水的副作用相当,P 值均为 0.49。 这项研究表明,与同类产品 Cosopt 相比,使用普通疗法 Twinzol 具有可靠的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Early versus late initiation of infliximab for refractory uveitis in a cohort of Egyptian BD patients Evaluation of macular vessel density among patients with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal participants “A study of knowledge, attitude and practice patterns regarding eye donation, eye banking and corneal transplantation in tertiary care hospital” Impact of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to peribulbar anesthesia on the retinal vasculature in glaucoma patients: an optical coherence tomography angiography study Changes in peripapillary and macular vasculature measured by optical coherence tomography angiography and their clinical correlation in patients with optic neuritis due to multiple sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1