Ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment of the vesicoureteral reflux in children

V.F. Peterburgskyy, O.A. Kalishchuk, A. Klius
{"title":"Ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment of the vesicoureteral reflux in children","authors":"V.F. Peterburgskyy, O.A. Kalishchuk, A. Klius","doi":"10.15574/ps.2023.80.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - to investigate the ureteral obstruction (UO) frequency after endoscopic injection of the vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children. Materials and methods. 1068 children aged 8 months -15 years were respectively reviewed after endoscopic treatment of the VUR grades 2-4. The following factors were analyzed in terms of ureteral obstruction: age, sex, reflux grade. Also the clinical manifestations were reviewed as the ureteral obstruction management types (conservative - 28 (52.8%), stenting - (26.5%), reimplantation of the ureter - 11 (20.7%) as well. Statistical analysis of the frequency of OS (categorical data) was performed using nonparametric estimation methods (χ², Fisher's exact test). A difference of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. The total incidence of ureteral obstruction was 3.44% (53/1539 ureters). There were early (41 children) and late (12 children) obstructed units. The following risk factors for developing ureteral obstruction proved to be significant: sex (males), low reflux grade. The early UO was treated mostly with watchful waiting, stenting (13 cases) and 2 cases were submitted to open surgery. In late UO ureteral reimplantation was utilized (9 cases) as well as ureteral stenting was helpful. Conclusions. UO is an infrequent but essential complication of the endoscopic VUR correction. The early UO cases are effectively treated by watchful waiting with/without empty bladder or ureteral stenting. Ureteral reimplantation seems to be the main procedure in late UO cases. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of all participating institutions. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies. No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.","PeriodicalId":166002,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric Surgery. Ukraine","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric Surgery. Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15574/ps.2023.80.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose - to investigate the ureteral obstruction (UO) frequency after endoscopic injection of the vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children. Materials and methods. 1068 children aged 8 months -15 years were respectively reviewed after endoscopic treatment of the VUR grades 2-4. The following factors were analyzed in terms of ureteral obstruction: age, sex, reflux grade. Also the clinical manifestations were reviewed as the ureteral obstruction management types (conservative - 28 (52.8%), stenting - (26.5%), reimplantation of the ureter - 11 (20.7%) as well. Statistical analysis of the frequency of OS (categorical data) was performed using nonparametric estimation methods (χ², Fisher's exact test). A difference of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. The total incidence of ureteral obstruction was 3.44% (53/1539 ureters). There were early (41 children) and late (12 children) obstructed units. The following risk factors for developing ureteral obstruction proved to be significant: sex (males), low reflux grade. The early UO was treated mostly with watchful waiting, stenting (13 cases) and 2 cases were submitted to open surgery. In late UO ureteral reimplantation was utilized (9 cases) as well as ureteral stenting was helpful. Conclusions. UO is an infrequent but essential complication of the endoscopic VUR correction. The early UO cases are effectively treated by watchful waiting with/without empty bladder or ureteral stenting. Ureteral reimplantation seems to be the main procedure in late UO cases. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of all participating institutions. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies. No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童膀胱输尿管反流内窥镜治疗后的输尿管梗阻
目的--研究儿童膀胱输尿管反流(VUR)内窥镜注射后的输尿管梗阻(UO)频率。材料和方法。分别对 1068 名 8 个月至 15 岁的 VUR 2-4 级内窥镜治疗后的儿童进行了复查。分析了输尿管梗阻的以下因素:年龄、性别、反流等级。此外,还回顾了输尿管梗阻的临床表现和治疗类型(保守治疗 28 例(52.8%)、支架植入术 26.5%、输尿管再植术 11 例(20.7%))。采用非参数估计方法(χ²、费雪精确检验)对 OS 频率(分类数据)进行统计分析。P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。结果输尿管梗阻的总发生率为 3.44%(53/1539 个输尿管)。梗阻单位有早期(41 名儿童)和晚期(12 名儿童)之分。事实证明,发生输尿管梗阻的以下风险因素非常重要:性别(男性)、低反流等级。早期输尿管梗阻的治疗方法主要是观察等待、支架植入(13 例)和 2 例开放手术。晚期尿失禁患者则采用输尿管再植术(9 例)和输尿管支架植入术。结论。尿失禁是内镜下输尿管返流矫正术中一种不常见但不可或缺的并发症。早期尿失禁病例可通过空膀胱/不空膀胱观察等待或输尿管支架植入术得到有效治疗。输尿管再植术似乎是晚期尿崩症病例的主要治疗方法。本研究按照《赫尔辛基宣言》的原则进行。研究方案获得了所有参与机构当地伦理委员会的批准。进行研究时已获得患者的知情同意。作者未申报任何利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical and potentiometric examinations of adolescent patients with chronic odontogenic maxillary sinusitis in the presence of galvanic pathology in the oral cavity Ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment of the vesicoureteral reflux in children Morphological changes of the vaginal process wall of the peritoneum in the case of its obliteration disorders in children of different age groups The first intravital case of diagnosis and treatment of a giant teratoma of the sacrococcygeal area, which exceeded the body weight of a newborn on 1.5 times Acute necrotizing pneumonia and pyofibrinothorax in an experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1