THE REFORMATION OF MEDICAL ORGANIZATIONS IN OMNIBUS LAW ON HEALTH: SINGLE OR MULTI-BAR

Rikko Hudyono, Suparnyo Suparnyo
{"title":"THE REFORMATION OF MEDICAL ORGANIZATIONS IN OMNIBUS LAW ON HEALTH: SINGLE OR MULTI-BAR","authors":"Rikko Hudyono, Suparnyo Suparnyo","doi":"10.26532/jph.v10i2.32043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Omnibus Law on Health had been approved which in consequence allow other medical professional organizations to be established as doctors’ right to organize in which may provoke ethical problems. The recent Omnibus Law on Health enabled opportunity for multi-bar organizations; even it was in accordance with single-bar system. This paper aims to review the medical professional organization system in the Omnibus Law on Health which is most in line with the freedom of association and does not reduce the right to health as a human right that must be accepted by the wider community. The author argues that the emergence of several professional organizations as embodiment of doctor’s right may not suitable as it may procure ethical ambiguity. However, the compulsion to join single organization per se was a violation of our Constitution. In this case, we need the highest regulatory and controlling authority from the State to preserve the public interest. The concept of this federal multi-bar association may solve this problem.","PeriodicalId":34168,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v10i2.32043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Omnibus Law on Health had been approved which in consequence allow other medical professional organizations to be established as doctors’ right to organize in which may provoke ethical problems. The recent Omnibus Law on Health enabled opportunity for multi-bar organizations; even it was in accordance with single-bar system. This paper aims to review the medical professional organization system in the Omnibus Law on Health which is most in line with the freedom of association and does not reduce the right to health as a human right that must be accepted by the wider community. The author argues that the emergence of several professional organizations as embodiment of doctor’s right may not suitable as it may procure ethical ambiguity. However, the compulsion to join single organization per se was a violation of our Constitution. In this case, we need the highest regulatory and controlling authority from the State to preserve the public interest. The concept of this federal multi-bar association may solve this problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生总括法》中的医疗组织改革:单杠还是多杠
卫生总括法》已获批准,因此允许成立其他医疗专业组织,作为医生的组织权,这可能会引发伦理问题。最近的《卫生综合法》为多委员会组织提供了机会;即使它是按照单委员会制度制定的。本文旨在回顾《卫生总法》中的医疗专业组织制度,该制度最符合结社自由的原则,而且不会削弱健康权这一必须得到更广泛社会认可的人权。作者认为,出现多个专业组织作为医生权利的体现可能并不合适,因为这可能导致伦理上的模糊。然而,强制加入单一组织本身就违反了我国宪法。在这种情况下,我们需要国家的最高监管和控制机构来维护公众利益。这种联邦多律师协会的概念可以解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE FOR NARCOTICS ADDICTS BASED ON LEGAL BENEFITS DEVELOPMENT OF THE HERITAGE CENTER AS BANKRUPTCY CURATOR ONE SOLUTION OF DIGITIZING LAND SERVICES TO PREVENT LAND MAFIA IN NIGERIA CONSIDERATION OF JUDGES OF THE PANDAN RELIGIOUS COURT IN DETERMINING THE STATUS OF THE DEFENDANT / INVISIBLE APPLICANT: MAQASHID AL-USRAH PERSPECTIVE THE LEGAL PROTECTION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN PEER TO PEER LENDING-BASED FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY ASPECT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1