The Risk of Adverse Drug-Drug Interactions for Stable Angina Pectoris Patients with Heart Failure Complication Prescribed Polypharmacy

Ahmad Aldi Fadillah, Mohammad Bakhriansyah, Intan Yustikasari, P. W. Nurikhwan, D. L. Adiputro
{"title":"The Risk of Adverse Drug-Drug Interactions for Stable Angina Pectoris Patients with Heart Failure Complication Prescribed Polypharmacy","authors":"Ahmad Aldi Fadillah, Mohammad Bakhriansyah, Intan Yustikasari, P. W. Nurikhwan, D. L. Adiputro","doi":"10.20527/jbk.v19i2.17404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stable angina pectoris (SAP) is an imbalance that occurs when myocardial oxygen need increases disproportionally, causing complaints of chest pain. Uncontrolled SAP can lead to a complication of heart failure (HF). Polypharmacy treatment frequently given to SAP patients with HF complications can be potentially detrimental for them. This study aims to determine the risk of adverse drug-drug interactions in SAP patients with HF complications prescribed polypharmacy. This was an analytic observational study with a cross-sectional approach using retrospective data from medical record data from 2020-2021 among hospitalized patients in cardiology ward Ulin General Hospital, Banjarmasin. Potential drug-drug interactions were determined using the Lexicomp tool from the UpToDate® site. Prevalence Odds Ratio (POR) and 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) were determined using the Logistic Regression test at the 95% level of confidence. Twenty-four SAP patients with HF were recruited. According to its potential interactions, the most interactions were under category C (82.6%), followed by category B (11.3%) and category D (6.0%). Based on its level of severity, the most common was moderate (77.4%), followed by minor (13.0%) and major (9.5%). SAP patients with HF who were not prescribed polypharmacy had a lower risk of adverse drug-drug interactions by 64.7% compared to polypharmacy users, although it was not statistically difference (crude POR 0.353, 95% CI; 0.360-3.421; p-value = 0.369). This study shows that there is a tendency of lower risk of adverse drug-drug interactions in SAP patients with HF complication prescribed polypharmacy compared to those without polypharmacy, but the association is not statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":53378,"journal":{"name":"Berkala Kedokteran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkala Kedokteran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20527/jbk.v19i2.17404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stable angina pectoris (SAP) is an imbalance that occurs when myocardial oxygen need increases disproportionally, causing complaints of chest pain. Uncontrolled SAP can lead to a complication of heart failure (HF). Polypharmacy treatment frequently given to SAP patients with HF complications can be potentially detrimental for them. This study aims to determine the risk of adverse drug-drug interactions in SAP patients with HF complications prescribed polypharmacy. This was an analytic observational study with a cross-sectional approach using retrospective data from medical record data from 2020-2021 among hospitalized patients in cardiology ward Ulin General Hospital, Banjarmasin. Potential drug-drug interactions were determined using the Lexicomp tool from the UpToDate® site. Prevalence Odds Ratio (POR) and 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) were determined using the Logistic Regression test at the 95% level of confidence. Twenty-four SAP patients with HF were recruited. According to its potential interactions, the most interactions were under category C (82.6%), followed by category B (11.3%) and category D (6.0%). Based on its level of severity, the most common was moderate (77.4%), followed by minor (13.0%) and major (9.5%). SAP patients with HF who were not prescribed polypharmacy had a lower risk of adverse drug-drug interactions by 64.7% compared to polypharmacy users, although it was not statistically difference (crude POR 0.353, 95% CI; 0.360-3.421; p-value = 0.369). This study shows that there is a tendency of lower risk of adverse drug-drug interactions in SAP patients with HF complication prescribed polypharmacy compared to those without polypharmacy, but the association is not statistically significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心力衰竭并发稳定型心绞痛患者服用多种药物后发生药物间不良相互作用的风险
稳定型心绞痛(SAP)是当心肌需氧量不成比例地增加时出现的一种不平衡现象,会引起胸痛。不受控制的 SAP 可导致心力衰竭(HF)并发症。对有心力衰竭并发症的 SAP 患者经常采用多种药物治疗可能对他们不利。本研究旨在确定有心力衰竭并发症的 SAP 患者接受多种药物治疗时发生不良药物相互作用的风险。这是一项横断面分析观察性研究,使用的是2020-2021年班加罗尔马辛乌林综合医院心脏病科病房住院患者的病历回顾性数据。使用 UpToDate® 网站的 Lexicomp 工具确定潜在的药物相互作用。使用置信度为 95% 的 Logistic 回归测试确定了患病率比值 (POR) 和 95% 置信区间 (95%CI)。共招募了 24 名 SAP 高血压患者。根据其潜在的相互作用,最多的相互作用属于 C 类(82.6%),其次是 B 类(11.3%)和 D 类(6.0%)。根据其严重程度,最常见的是中度(77.4%),其次是轻度(13.0%)和重度(9.5%)。与使用多种药物的 SAP 高血压患者相比,未使用多种药物的 SAP 高血压患者发生药物间不良相互作用的风险降低了 64.7%,但并无统计学差异(粗略 POR 0.353,95% CI;0.360-3.421;P 值 = 0.369)。本研究表明,与未使用多种药物的患者相比,使用多种药物的高血压并发症 SAP 患者发生药物间不良相互作用的风险有降低的趋势,但这种关联在统计学上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association Of Gestational Age And Birth Weight With Neonatal Sepsis In Ulin Hospital Banjarmasin Coefficient Test of Antimicrobial Phenol Combination of Eichhornia crassipes and Pistia stratiotes Extract In Vitro as Alternative Disinfection Candidates The Effect of Wetland Geography on the Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus in South Kalimantan Risk Factors Analysis in Recurrent Stroke Events: Literature Review The Risk of Adverse Drug-Drug Interactions for Stable Angina Pectoris Patients with Heart Failure Complication Prescribed Polypharmacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1