Phonophoresis Versus TENS on Low Back Pain after Delivery

M. S. O. M. NORHAN M. ELGHANDOR, M.Sc.*; MAGDA
{"title":"Phonophoresis Versus TENS on Low Back Pain after Delivery","authors":"M. S. O. M. NORHAN M. ELGHANDOR, M.Sc.*; MAGDA","doi":"10.21608/mjcu.2023.325786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: About Thirty-five percent of women have severe low back pain after delivery. Phonophoresis is effective in treating acute and chronic back pain. Aim of Study: This study was conducted to compare between the efficacy of Phonophoresis and Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on low back pain after delivery. Patients and Methods: This study was carried out on Forty multiparous women suffering from severe Low back Pain For at Least 3 months after delivery. They were selected randomly from the outpatient clinic of orthopedic of Zagazig University Hospitals. Their ages were ranged from 25-35 years old; their body mass index (BMI) didn’t exceed 30 kg/m 2 and their parity was ranged from (2-4) children. All participants were experienced normal delivery or cesarean section. All patients were divided randomly into 2 groups equal in number, group (A) & group (B). Group (A) received Ketoprofen phonophoresis on her lower back for 10 minutes, 3 times/week for 8 weeks, while group (B) received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on her lower back (With frequency 80-120 HZ, pulse width 200 us with low intensity) for 30 minutes, 3 times/week for 8 weeks. Low back pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and serotonin level in blood plasma before and after treatment. Results: The results of this study revealed that, both groups (A&B) showed statistically ( p -value <0.001) significant decrease in VAS scores and increase in serotonin level in blood plasma after treatment, but the percent of decrease in pain sensation and percentage of increase in serotonin level were more pronounced and more noticeable in (group A) when compared to group (B). This means that, phonophoresis was more effective than TENS in relieving low back pain after delivery. Conclusion: Phonophoresis is more effective than TENS treating low back pain after delivery.","PeriodicalId":22964,"journal":{"name":"The Medical Journal of Cairo University","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical Journal of Cairo University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjcu.2023.325786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: About Thirty-five percent of women have severe low back pain after delivery. Phonophoresis is effective in treating acute and chronic back pain. Aim of Study: This study was conducted to compare between the efficacy of Phonophoresis and Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on low back pain after delivery. Patients and Methods: This study was carried out on Forty multiparous women suffering from severe Low back Pain For at Least 3 months after delivery. They were selected randomly from the outpatient clinic of orthopedic of Zagazig University Hospitals. Their ages were ranged from 25-35 years old; their body mass index (BMI) didn’t exceed 30 kg/m 2 and their parity was ranged from (2-4) children. All participants were experienced normal delivery or cesarean section. All patients were divided randomly into 2 groups equal in number, group (A) & group (B). Group (A) received Ketoprofen phonophoresis on her lower back for 10 minutes, 3 times/week for 8 weeks, while group (B) received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on her lower back (With frequency 80-120 HZ, pulse width 200 us with low intensity) for 30 minutes, 3 times/week for 8 weeks. Low back pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and serotonin level in blood plasma before and after treatment. Results: The results of this study revealed that, both groups (A&B) showed statistically ( p -value <0.001) significant decrease in VAS scores and increase in serotonin level in blood plasma after treatment, but the percent of decrease in pain sensation and percentage of increase in serotonin level were more pronounced and more noticeable in (group A) when compared to group (B). This means that, phonophoresis was more effective than TENS in relieving low back pain after delivery. Conclusion: Phonophoresis is more effective than TENS treating low back pain after delivery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音波治疗与 TENS 对产后腰痛的影响
背景:约有 35% 的妇女在分娩后会出现严重的腰背疼痛。音波治疗对治疗急性和慢性腰痛有效。研究目的本研究旨在比较音波治疗和经皮神经电刺激(TENS)对产后腰背痛的疗效。患者和方法:研究对象为 40 名产后至少 3 个月患有严重腰背痛的多产妇。她们是从扎加齐格大学医院骨科门诊中随机挑选出来的。她们的年龄介于 25-35 岁之间,体重指数 (BMI) 不超过 30 kg/m 2,胎次介于 (2-4) 胎之间。所有参与者均经历过顺产或剖腹产。所有患者被随机分为人数相等的两组:A 组和 B 组。A组患者在腰部接受酮洛芬音波治疗,每次10分钟,每周3次,共8周;B组患者在腰部接受经皮神经电刺激(频率80-120 HZ,脉宽200 us,强度较低),每次30分钟,每周3次,共8周。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和治疗前后血浆中的血清素水平对腰痛进行评估。研究结果研究结果表明,两组(A 组和 B 组)治疗后 VAS 评分和血浆中血清素水平均有显著下降(P 值均小于 0.001),但与 B 组相比,A 组疼痛感下降的百分比和血清素水平上升的百分比更明显、更显著。这说明,音波治疗在缓解产后腰痛方面比 TENS 更有效。结论音波疗法比 TENS 更能有效治疗产后腰痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Vestibular Versus Dual-Task Training on Balance in Children with Diplegic Cerebral Palsy Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: How to identify by Imaging Features? Predictors of Mortality for Patients with Severe COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit Functional Outcome of Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Prolapse Factors Affecting Visual Outcomes after Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1