Peer victimization of Indian students: Prevalence and correlates

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Scientific Society Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.4103/jss.jss_221_22
Malhi Prahbhjot, Manjit Sidhu, Bhavneet Bharti
{"title":"Peer victimization of Indian students: Prevalence and correlates","authors":"Malhi Prahbhjot, Manjit Sidhu, Bhavneet Bharti","doi":"10.4103/jss.jss_221_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To examine the overlap of traditional and cyber victimization and the relationship between victimization and self-esteem of college and university students. Methodology: The study utilized a cross-sectional online survey design to measure the self-reported experiences of peer victimization of higher education students. The multidimensional bullying and cyberbullying scale and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale were used to measure traditional and cyber victimization and self-esteem, respectively. The study was cleared by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Results: A total of 854 complete responses were included in the study (mean age = 21.6 years, standard deviation = 3.55) and a little more than three-fourths of the participants were females (76.7%). The overall prevalence of victimization of any type of bullying was 44.6%. Offline victimization was more common and overall, 40.9% reported being victimized offline, while 23.3% reported being victimized online in the last 3 months, respectively. There was considerable overlap between various types of victimization, and the correlations between cyberbullying, physical, verbal, and relational bullying were moderate (range 0.41–0.56). Most were bullied by known people and friends (28.1%). Only a small proportion considered reporting the bullying to the authorities (10.7%). No link between problematic technology use and cyber victimization was found. A one-way Analysis of variance revealed that victims of both types of bullying had the lowest self-esteem score (F = 9.04, P = 0.0001). Conclusions: Public health policymakers need to focus on positive youth development to foster resilience in the face of adversity and help young adults to thrive and flourish in a rapidly expanding and evolving digital world.","PeriodicalId":55681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Scientific Society","volume":"11 1","pages":"368 - 374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Scientific Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jss.jss_221_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the overlap of traditional and cyber victimization and the relationship between victimization and self-esteem of college and university students. Methodology: The study utilized a cross-sectional online survey design to measure the self-reported experiences of peer victimization of higher education students. The multidimensional bullying and cyberbullying scale and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale were used to measure traditional and cyber victimization and self-esteem, respectively. The study was cleared by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Results: A total of 854 complete responses were included in the study (mean age = 21.6 years, standard deviation = 3.55) and a little more than three-fourths of the participants were females (76.7%). The overall prevalence of victimization of any type of bullying was 44.6%. Offline victimization was more common and overall, 40.9% reported being victimized offline, while 23.3% reported being victimized online in the last 3 months, respectively. There was considerable overlap between various types of victimization, and the correlations between cyberbullying, physical, verbal, and relational bullying were moderate (range 0.41–0.56). Most were bullied by known people and friends (28.1%). Only a small proportion considered reporting the bullying to the authorities (10.7%). No link between problematic technology use and cyber victimization was found. A one-way Analysis of variance revealed that victims of both types of bullying had the lowest self-esteem score (F = 9.04, P = 0.0001). Conclusions: Public health policymakers need to focus on positive youth development to foster resilience in the face of adversity and help young adults to thrive and flourish in a rapidly expanding and evolving digital world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度学生的同伴伤害:普遍性和相关性
研究目的研究大专院校学生传统受害与网络受害的重叠情况,以及受害与自尊之间的关系。研究方法:本研究采用横断面在线调查设计,测量高校学生自我报告的同伴受害经历。多维欺凌与网络欺凌量表和罗森伯格自尊量表分别用于测量传统的和网络的受害情况和自尊。本研究通过了机构伦理委员会的审核。研究结果共有 854 份完整答卷被纳入研究(平均年龄 = 21.6 岁,标准差 = 3.55),女性参与者占四分之三多一点(76.7%)。遭受任何类型欺凌的总体比例为 44.6%。线下受害情况更为普遍,总体而言,40.9%的受访者表示在过去三个月内曾在线下受害,而23.3%的受访者表示在过去三个月内曾在网上受害。各种类型的受害情况有相当大的重叠,网络欺凌、身体欺凌、言语欺凌和关系欺凌之间的相关性为中等(范围为 0.41-0.56)。大多数人受到了熟人和朋友的欺凌(28.1%)。只有一小部分人考虑向有关部门举报欺凌行为(10.7%)。没有发现问题技术的使用与网络受害之间存在联系。单因素方差分析显示,这两种欺凌行为的受害者自尊心得分最低(F = 9.04,P = 0.0001)。结论公共卫生政策制定者需要关注青少年的积极发展,培养他们面对逆境时的适应能力,帮助青少年在快速发展和演变的数字世界中茁壮成长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Scientific Society
Journal of the Scientific Society MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
An inclusive exploration of forced degradation analysis of some therapeutic categories of drugs in the last decade Use of platelet-rich fibrin in hypospadias surgery Training medical students in cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal domain competencies: Existing challenges and role of medical teachers Newer prospects of regenerative endodontics: A comprehensive and updated review of literature A retrospective study on the occurrence and prevalence of ovarian masses in the patients of Rajkot District, Gujarat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1