AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY ON CLINICAL SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ANTIVIRAL MEDICATIONS USED IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS-B VIRUS INFECTION

Aakula Anusha, K. Balaji, Asawar Sai Chandana, Bandaripalli Navya Sri, Chandan Kumar K.N.
{"title":"AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY ON CLINICAL SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ANTIVIRAL MEDICATIONS USED IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS-B VIRUS INFECTION","authors":"Aakula Anusha, K. Balaji, Asawar Sai Chandana, Bandaripalli Navya Sri, Chandan Kumar K.N.","doi":"10.55218/jasr.202314708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hepatitis B is serious liver illness that is brought on by hepatitis B virus. It is classified into two types- acute and chronic hepatitis. Antivirals are the best choice of treatment for Hepatitis-B. Tenofovir (25mg and 300mg) and Entecavir (0.5mg) are currently used medications to control viral replication and suppress viral DNA levels. The study was a single centered, observational study that included 60 chronic hepatitis-B patients. They were split into two groups of patients prescribed with Tenofovir and Entecavir. Our study was conducted on 60 patients out of which 81.66% were found to be males and 18.33% were found to be females. Among them, most of the patients belonged to the age group 41-60 years (51.66%). In 51 patients taking Tenofovir monotherapy, 41 patients (80.40%) were having ≤2000 IU/mL. In 6 patients taking Entecavir monotherapy, 3 patients (50%) were having ≤2000 IU/mL. In 3 patients taking Dual therapy, 2 patients (66.67%) were having ≤2000 IU/mL. Among 60 patients, ADRs were reported in 41 patients (68.33%). Commonly reported ADRs were weakness, headache, dizziness, abdominal pain. These are mild and occasional. 73.40% patients reported ADRs while using Tenofovir and 83.33% patients reported ADRs while using Entecavir. From our study, it was observed that Tenofovir is having good safety and efficacy (80.40%) whereas Entecavir is having 50% efficacy. Tenofovir safety and efficacy is much more when compared to safety and efficacy of Entecavir.","PeriodicalId":14906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Scientific Research","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55218/jasr.202314708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hepatitis B is serious liver illness that is brought on by hepatitis B virus. It is classified into two types- acute and chronic hepatitis. Antivirals are the best choice of treatment for Hepatitis-B. Tenofovir (25mg and 300mg) and Entecavir (0.5mg) are currently used medications to control viral replication and suppress viral DNA levels. The study was a single centered, observational study that included 60 chronic hepatitis-B patients. They were split into two groups of patients prescribed with Tenofovir and Entecavir. Our study was conducted on 60 patients out of which 81.66% were found to be males and 18.33% were found to be females. Among them, most of the patients belonged to the age group 41-60 years (51.66%). In 51 patients taking Tenofovir monotherapy, 41 patients (80.40%) were having ≤2000 IU/mL. In 6 patients taking Entecavir monotherapy, 3 patients (50%) were having ≤2000 IU/mL. In 3 patients taking Dual therapy, 2 patients (66.67%) were having ≤2000 IU/mL. Among 60 patients, ADRs were reported in 41 patients (68.33%). Commonly reported ADRs were weakness, headache, dizziness, abdominal pain. These are mild and occasional. 73.40% patients reported ADRs while using Tenofovir and 83.33% patients reported ADRs while using Entecavir. From our study, it was observed that Tenofovir is having good safety and efficacy (80.40%) whereas Entecavir is having 50% efficacy. Tenofovir safety and efficacy is much more when compared to safety and efficacy of Entecavir.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染者使用抗病毒药物的临床安全性和有效性观察研究
乙型肝炎是由乙型肝炎病毒引起的严重肝病。它分为急性和慢性肝炎两种类型。抗病毒药物是治疗乙型肝炎的最佳选择。替诺福韦(25 毫克和 300 毫克)和恩替卡韦(0.5 毫克)是目前用于控制病毒复制和抑制病毒 DNA 水平的药物。该研究是一项单一中心的观察性研究,包括 60 名慢性乙型肝炎患者。他们被分成两组,分别服用替诺福韦和恩替卡韦。我们的研究对象为 60 名患者,其中 81.66% 为男性,18.33% 为女性。其中,大多数患者属于 41-60 岁年龄组(51.66%)。在 51 名接受替诺福韦单药治疗的患者中,41 名患者(80.40%)的血药浓度≤2000 IU/mL。在 6 名接受恩替卡韦单一疗法的患者中,有 3 名患者(50%)的 IU 值低于 2000 IU/mL。在 3 名接受双重疗法的患者中,有 2 名患者(66.67%)的 ADR 值≤2000 IU/mL。在 60 名患者中,有 41 名患者(68.33%)报告了不良反应。常见的不良反应有乏力、头痛、头晕和腹痛。这些反应都很轻微,偶尔发生。73.40%的患者在使用替诺福韦时报告了不良反应,83.33%的患者在使用恩替卡韦时报告了不良反应。 从我们的研究中可以看出,替诺福韦的安全性和有效性较好(80.40%),而恩替卡韦的有效性为 50%。与恩替卡韦的安全性和有效性相比,替诺福韦的安全性和有效性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Review on Coronary Stents: With Polymers and without Polymers Evaluation of Neuroprotective effect of Bioactive compounds of Mucuna monosperma in PD lines of Drosophila melanogaster Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Antidiabetic Capsules Contribution of Unani Physicians in Tashrīḥ al-Raḥim (Anatomy of the Uterus): A Systematic Review Isolation and Characterization of Rhizobacteria from Soil and Its Efficiency as Plant Growth- Promoting Microbes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1